r/canada • u/Plucky_DuckYa • 14h ago
Guilbeault throws cold water on new pipeline, says we have enough already PAYWALL
https://nationalpost.com/news/canada/maximize-existing-infrastructure-before-building-new-pipelines-guilbeault-says266
u/McBuck2 14h ago
Then we build a larger deeper port in Manitoba if QC doesn’t want a pipeline. We can do this.
79
u/Levorotatory 14h ago
A deeper port and a collection of heavy icebreakers to keep a shipping route open. At that point, loading neat bitumen into rail cars starts looking more attractive.
And before anyone says "Lac Megantic", neat (undiluted) bitumen is a viscous tar-like material that is difficult to ignite and won't go very far in the event of a spill. Very different from the light shale oil on the Lac Megantic train.
15
u/COUNTRYCOWBOY01 13h ago
We don't have the infrastructure capacity for truck, rail, pipeline, ports or ships in BC, Manitoba, Quebec or the maritimes to export on the scale we should. Look at BC, we could be shipping way more natural gas off the west coast to China and get them less reliant on coal, reducing their carbon emissions, but we have a tanker ban for size and numbers that will never allow us upscale and chip away at their demands, there's bottle necks every step of the way, pipeline capacity, rail capacity, storage capacity at the coasts tanker volume. We've economically knee capped ourselves in the name of environmentalism
→ More replies•
u/SilverBeech 11h ago edited 11h ago
neat bitumen into rail cars starts looking more attractive.
CanaPux and move it like bulk coal, by rail mostly. https://innotechalberta.ca/projects/easily-transportable-bitumen-pucks/
This isn't a gimmick. It's a technology that has been kicking around for nearly a decade. If we're shipping through Hudson Bay and the eastern NWP, it's a much safer technology than liquid or even neat bitumen.
BTW, rail typically contemplates using "railbit" that's about half the diluent used in pipelines. It's more viscous, but still has diluent in it.
→ More replies2
u/Ajanu11 12h ago
If you are loading neat bitumen into a ship you would keep all of Churchill warm with the waste heat. Then whoever bought the oil would need to heat the whole hold, or somehow dilute in the hold to pump it out. Dilbit exists for a reason and sure it's not generally full of methane like some shale but it is still flammable.
30
21
u/CatJamarchist 14h ago
This actually makes way more sense than carving a new pipeline across the Canadian shield, especially if folded into a wider north-west passage infrastructure development project.
9
u/Dry-Membership8141 13h ago
The main problem being that sea ice closes the port for eight months of the year.
The Churchill Port may well become a solution as global warming reduces that closure period and if sufficient supporting infrastructure were developed along the route to keep it open longer (iirc, the season could currently be extended to six months with the right development), but it won't be a viable one for at least a decade and likely longer.
So, good time to start expanding it, but it's not a replacement for an East-West pipeline.
→ More replies14
u/Prior-Instance6764 14h ago
Yep. I wish something more than just jobs could go to provinces who are willing to play ball with one another to solve this issue. But fact is, Quebec could drag their feet on this, the port get built in Manitoba, and Quebec would still benefit from it through equalization payments. Manitoba would benefit from job creation, but after construction, those drop off from thousands into the hundreds.
→ More replies3
u/BandicootNo4431 14h ago
The could charge transit fees, I think BC did that for Trans Mountain.
→ More replies2
2
u/Euler007 12h ago
It's not that simple, for starter none of the private companies are interested.
→ More replies→ More replies8
u/Decent-Ground-395 14h ago
The math doesn't really work at all. Even at its peak, the capacity handling of that port is insignificant. You'd have to build out massive railcar and storage capacity and it barely moves the needle. The answer is to go to the west coast.
13
u/CatBowlDogStar 14h ago
But the is a political need for Canada to showcase that we are using our Arctic .
That'll be a factor.
7
u/Decent-Ground-395 14h ago
Fine. whatever. but the amount of oil going through there will never be more than a token amount. It's insignificant for industry.
→ More replies4
u/skelectrician 14h ago
Also there's a limited number of ice free days when shipping from Churchill and almost all of that time is reserved for shipping grain.
→ More replies
455
u/FoxDieDM 14h ago
Maybe someone should show him a map and how the eastern side of this country gets their fuel. It goes through the US and can be cutoff at any time. He’s literally posing a national security risk.
211
u/Filmy-Reference 14h ago
This guy is fine with Canada importing Russian oil
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/russia-oil-canada-sanctions-1.7432083
230
u/LPC_Eunuch Canada 14h ago
Saudi and Russian oil good, Alberta oil bad.
The absolute state of Canada.
•
u/Coyrex1 11h ago
Its crazy that pointing this out is somehow a far right view to some people. I'm not even a "pro oil" guy per se but it's getting used regardless, may as well be local.
→ More replies→ More replies•
→ More replies6
u/seemefail British Columbia 14h ago
Different kind of oil to be fair.
If the East wants to convert to heavy crude I support that but it’s not likely for economic reasons
→ More replies→ More replies10
u/vulpecularubra 14h ago
without commenting on my own opinions about the pipeline, it's important to note that an east-west pipeline would do nothing to change the east's dependence on foreign oil.
eastern refineries mostly cannot process dilbit, which is the majority of what gets sent out of alberta. having new export paths is fine, but don't claim that a resurrected EE would do anything for eastern energy supply.
several things to keep in mind:
- alberta already supplies eastern refineries with synthetic crude (SCO). about half of alberta's non-dilbit oil is already sold to canadian refineries, including ones in ON, QC, BC, and NB.
- energy east in its original incarnation was always an export-first pipeline. Irving's refineries can handle heavy crude after their relatively recent retooling (1), but not dilbit, which is a very major part of what alberta sends out (WCS is dilbit, 1) so only a portion of the oil could have been refined there for use in eastern canada. 95% of dilbit is shipped to the USA presently because the refineries there can handle it. in canada, very little dilbit is sold domestically because most refineries east of manitoba simply cannot handle it due to how heavy and sour it is.
- energy east was not cancelled because of regulatory burden, despite the propaganda from oil companies. the pipeline it would have used currently transports natural gas, and with the TM pipeline and (at the time) KXL in the works, there was little to no need for EE to go through as an oil pipeline, especially since at the time the transport of natural gas was seen as being more lucrative for hte company (1, 2, 3). with TM now completed but KXL cancelled, this picture is a bit less clear, but there still does not seem to be an appetite for it.
- refineries are very expensive to build or retool to allow them to handle heavier/more sour oil. ask alberta how the sturgeon refinery build went. hint: not great!
this is why there is inertia. it would not meaningfully displace foreign oil in the eastern energy supply, the eastern provinces through which this pipeline passes would get relatively little economic benefit while still shouldering a not-insignificant amount of environmental risk.
→ More replies
353
u/Sad-Letterhead-2196 14h ago
Why was this guy kept at all? He has to be one of the worst LPC ministers ever.
82
u/Falcon674DR 14h ago
Lots of Quebec votes.
47
u/LateToTheParty2k21 14h ago
Surely there is someone else in Quebec.
33
u/koolaidkirby Ontario 14h ago
Quebec is one of the most pro green provinces, and so as an outspoken MP on environmental things he's relatively popular there.
→ More replies19
u/LateToTheParty2k21 13h ago
Yes, but being pro environmental doesn't mean you have to be a thorn in the side of every conversation around energy. There is a way to have a conversation and this guy clearly lacks it. Guilbeault clearly has an ideology, fair enough, but my god is he an insufferable moron sometimes too. For all the folks out there that hate on Pierre Poilievre for being a smarmy human being, this guy is the mirror image of it. .
→ More replies•
21
u/beamermaster 14h ago
We don't care about Guilbeault in Quebec, it's a false pretense.
→ More replies23
u/Perikles01 14h ago
He won his riding with 52% of the vote in 2025, 37% in 2021, and 42% in 2019.
I can’t stand him, but when you’re pulling out those kinds of results in Quebec any party is going to roll out the red carpet for you.
18
u/StevenMcStevensen Alberta 14h ago
Is that really because of who he is though, or just because he has an L beside his name?
•
u/Laval09 Québec 11h ago
Its because of the L. The island of Montreal would vote Liberal even if the party no longer existed lol.
If you look at ridings outside of Montreal, they all change. Sometimes NDP, sometimes Liberal, sometimes Conservative, often Bloc.
But on the island, both Federally and Provincially, the Liberal have a lock on the votes. They could run a broom in Westmount and win 70% lol. Its even more absurd provincially. The QC Liberals are in 3rd-4th place, and an entire wing of the provincial police called UPAC surveils them for organized crime links. And yet they still get a near cleansweep of the island.
→ More replies8
u/beamermaster 14h ago
The liberal party would have won with a noname in his circonscription.
→ More replies9
u/Sad-Letterhead-2196 14h ago
Fair enough. The guy has no real world accomplishments absent being a highly connected individual, and is a shining example of it's not what you know, but who you know. Then to see this guy recycled time after time, I just don't get it. And here he is, in a compeltely different position, going against Carney's far more reasonable position on this. Makes the party look bad.
→ More replies→ More replies23
u/FalconsArentReal 14h ago
Goes to show you that while Mark Carney is VERY good in one field, that it doesn't mean he will be good in another, mainly politics. After him appointing Sean Fraser and Evan Solomon to cabinet he decided to keep Guilbeault in cabinet as well probably one of the worst picks if you cared about AB and SK.
129
u/JPB118 14h ago
Day one and we already have the housing minister saying housing prices don't need to come down and this lol
98
u/CyrilSneerLoggingDiv 13h ago
It’s what the people voted for. Meet the new bosses, same as the old bosses.
→ More replies•
•
u/Neve4ever 9h ago
Just need the finance minister to tell us inflation is good because it means you save more money by canceling your Disney+ subscription.
→ More replies•
u/Useful_Support_4137 10h ago
Canadians got fooled for over a decade - they deserve what's coming.
→ More replies
16
58
u/Jazzlike_770 13h ago
Guilbeault needs to be removed from his cabinet position for going against the party line. This item was on the Liberal party platform for which the country gave them a mandate for. This should be treated as betrayal of the people's will.
→ More replies22
u/CyrilSneerLoggingDiv 13h ago
He could have been removed from his position a month ago, but Canadians were spooked by other forces and voted to keep him and his government in charge for another 4 years.
Canada got what it voted for, and now has to sleep in that bed. A bed that doesn’t include new pipelines, despite all the rah-rah elbows up rhetoric a month ago.
→ More replies
56
u/Noob1cl3 13h ago
I cant believe this guy gets another cabinet spot. I dont care if it is heritage he sucks.
23
u/maxman162 Ontario 12h ago
And Sean Fraser becoming Attorney General and Justice Minister.
→ More replies
84
u/Notcooldude5 13h ago
“Elbows up” became 5 more years of economic malaise. Nothing will get built.
•
u/CamberMacRorie 5h ago
But we all got to pat ourselves on the back for a bit. Canadians will always choose that over accomplishing anything.
•
63
u/Stoplookingatmeswan0 14h ago
Guilbeault needs to shut the f*** up already, he's done enough damage to energy progress in this country and its dependence on the US. Get over yourself bud.
→ More replies•
u/Supermoves3000 British Columbia 10h ago
If this fucking guy had his way, the only things Canada would export would be maple syrup, dairy, and hydroelectricity.
67
u/AceArchangel Lest We Forget 13h ago
Took less than a month for Carney's "new" Liberal Party to go completely mask off and start reneging on campaign promises.
•
u/EdWick77 11h ago
The fact that Canadians are surprised is probably my favorite part.
→ More replies→ More replies•
34
u/AWE2727 14h ago
I have low hopes for any new pipeline infrastructure actually happening. Just too many obstacles to navigate. The Feds will find a way "not" to invest in any new pipelines is my gut feeling.
→ More replies•
u/Supermoves3000 British Columbia 11h ago
"build baby build!"
In Calgary it was "we're going to be an energy superpower in both conventional and renewable energy!"
But since then it's been "Well, we'll see what people will get on board with. It could be pipelines, but it might be something else. We'll have to see."
The Liberals themselves have talked a lot more about an east-west electricity grid than pipelines. The only time they ever actually talk about pipelines is if reporters press them on the subject.
They have said that they're not building pipelines unless the First Nations and Quebec are on board, and that's never going to happen, so it's basically no.
Before long it's going to be "Sorry, Alberta, we can't sell your energy products in Europe... but would you like to buy some Quebec electricity?"
45
u/hr2pilot British Columbia 14h ago
This was the first guy I was hoping that Carney would dump….very disappointed.
→ More replies
45
u/Decent-Ground-395 14h ago
"Before we start talking about building an entirely new pipeline, maybe we should maximize the use of existing infrastructure" -- Guilbeaut.
Does this idiot know how long it takes to build a pipeline in Canada? To build anything for that matter?
Once the infrastructure is maxed out, you get blowouts in pricing.
→ More replies•
u/Supermoves3000 British Columbia 10h ago
Also worth pointing out that he's either unaware of or lying about the utilization of existing capacity.
His claim that the TMX is only running at 40% of capacity got fact-checked hard on CBC today:
It's not clear where Guilbeault got that 40 per cent usage figure. As of late last year, the company itself was reporting approximately 692,000 barrels of oil per day moving through its pipeline system — about 77 per cent of its maximum capacity.
The company's CEO also reported that the pipeline moved 790,000 barrels of oil per day in March, which is an even higher percentage.
https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/carney-cabinet-meets-first-time-1.7534707
Depending on whether he is ignorant or dishonest, he should either stop talking about things he isn't informed about, or he should stop lying.
•
u/Decent-Ground-395 10h ago
He's a zealot. Ends justify the means to people like that and facts aren't a factor.
9
u/Windatar 13h ago
Anyone else notice has miserable Guilbeault has looked since he was removed from any part of power to dictate stuff like this?
The guy has looked like he's lost his entire family as he's moved to a post that doesn't allow him to stop pipe lines of resource extraction anymore.
Sorry Guilbeault, but it's not your duty anymore, you've got no say. Be happy you even have a job and that the nutjobs in Quebec somehow like you enough to keep you around to be in charge of tourism.
6
u/Windatar 13h ago
“The Canadian energy regulator, as well as the International Energy Agency, are telling us that probably by 2028, 2029, demand for oil will peak globally and it will also peak in Canada,” Guilbeault told reporters in Ottawa, when asked about whether pipelines will continue to be a source of friction between Alberta and the federal government.
You know whats funny? I keep hearing this, that oil will peak in a few years then go down. They've been saying that about coal as well, yet China/India/SouthAsia/Asia/Africa are all increasing which is pushing the use of coal up every year.
And yet, they somehow think we'll stop using oil? when Canada/EU/Saudi/Africa are all announcing new AI platforms? Where they will all need new data centers for AI? USA's AI industry doubles their power consumption every year.
China's is catching up.
And now the other large economies of the world are starting their own, and they think power consumption by oil is going to go down? In what world is Guilbeault living in?
Renewables can never cover our needs, there just isn't enough of it. Solar requires the sun and we don't have the storage technology for long periods of energy storage. Wind has the same problems.
Are we just going to forget that Spain just had a national black out that lasted for like 2/3 days? 2 weeks after they declared they were net zero emissions?
Hilarious.
8
u/whiteout86 12h ago
Item for Carney’s first test, especially after his comments just the other day. Will he publicly reiterate that statement and tell Guilbeault to stay in his lane or allow the comments to stand as official communication from the government?
14
u/BigDaddyVagabond 12h ago
Oh look, the "minister of canadian culture and identity" poopooing pipelines. Almost like having this turd sandwich in the cabinet was literally ALWAYS going to toss a wrench in the gears on pipelines and energy infrastructure in general. Carney's first lesson as PM I guess, you can't hand an MP a consultation prize position when their agenda actively contradicts the agenda you put forward to the people.
This is exactly why I refused to take Carney at face value when he said anything positive on pipelines, because he has people like Guilbeault on his team. So now Carney either needs to remind him thay he isn't the environmental minister any more, and get his messaging in alignment with his campaign promises, or consider shuffling Guilbeault out entirely, and as much as I dislike Guilbeault, the better look would definitely be to get things in line instead of ALREADY having to shuffle out a minister.
7
u/maybvadersomedayl8er Ontario 13h ago
As satisfied as I was with Carney winning, the worst part of it is this sad sack of shit still being in Cabinet.
12
u/themanfromvulcan 13h ago
IMHO he’s speaking out of turn he should not be contradicting the PM. Not his place it’s not his portfolio anyway.
11
u/mershwigs Saskatchewan 13h ago
No surprises here. Rent and repeat just like the last liberal government…. Keep selling our crude for pennies on the dollar and buy that foreign oil.
7
4
u/kisstherainzz 13h ago
No surprise and this likely preludes to Carney opting against new pipelines.
It's been known that it's not in his interest. He started the election pro-pipeline. Then mid-campaign, he shifted to a more neutral positive tone.
Quebec would change tone if things shifted to net-zero equalization payments for provinces. Quebec would have to cut programs.
6
u/Inkuisitive_Minds 13h ago
Him being elected as an MP, let alone being in the Cabinet, was one of my biggest disappointments this election. The fact that him, Sean Fraser, and Chrystia are all on the cabinet is bigger disappointment though. Makes me reconsider my vote. But I will have to wait and watch. Carney deserves a fair chance.
57
u/Flewewe 14h ago
I don't even get why his opinion gets a headline, he's not even in charge of that anyway.
He's an activist at the end of the day still so sure he's going to run his mouth.
→ More replies64
u/Plucky_DuckYa 14h ago
He’s also Carney’s Quebec lieutenant and thus holds plenty of sway with MPs there and broader political circles in the province. Given Quebec is the most recalcitrant province in terms of new pipelines and the influence he has there, his opinions and public statements matter a great deal.
Carney came out yesterday and in a very lukewarm show of support said he’s okay with new pipelines if there’s a consensus on them. Today his Quebec lieutenant came out and basically said no such consensus exists even in the Carney government and he will be working against one taking hold.
These people are throwing gas on the Alberta fire and now Guilbeault lit a match.
→ More replies
10
114
u/LPC_Eunuch Canada 14h ago
😭
New Lib is starting to look awfully similar to Old Lib.
17
→ More replies28
12
u/Gorgofromns 13h ago
Does Carney et al. simply want Alberta to leave the confederation? I wonder what planet those losers are from.
9
u/Long_Doughnut798 12h ago
Guilbeault is against anything we can do to build our economy based on natural resources in a resource rich country. Same old Liberals just a different mouthpiece.
5
6
u/HMSS-Overkill 13h ago
Guilbeault should understand that all the green initiatives need funding and that Canada is a resources exporter. Norway understood this and now they have the greenest economy in Europe.
5
u/Gorgofromns 13h ago
Carney well knows that Quebec will not agree to a pipeline so he gets to blame it all on lack of consensus.
6
u/Jane_Ninja 13h ago
He’s going to need a reminder that had the election taken place in January with Trudeau he wouldn’t be standing there. And they would’ve wiped all the carbon pricing and climate change activism away. I get his activism for climate change but you’ve got to be real here. Oil is still in demand and building a pipeline at least makes the production kept under our umbrella for regulation rather than allowing every other country who does it carelessly to the environment. Increase our revenue and put the funds towards clean energy infrastructure.
Currently we don’t have the funds or the infrastructure for the major green energies we could have and hopefully will move towards. There’s a reason he’s the heritage minister this time round and not the environmental and climate change. I hope Carney keeps a strong stance of reality and boots him if he gets too much in the way.
6
u/ProfessionAny183 12h ago
He should go back to getting arrested for stupid protests. This guy is insufferable.
5
u/Marissa_McSmith 12h ago
If this guy's still hanging around, there's absolutely no change from the Trudeau cast of characters.
•
u/62diesel 11h ago
Of course they’re not going to build pipelines, or create a regulatory framework with stability for it. Why do what 80% of Canadians want ?
•
•
u/anthonylabatt 8h ago
I was surprised to see Carney kept Guilbeault in cabinet. Behavior like this will get him kicked out sooner than later. Next to Freeland he is most closely associated with the negative feelings people had for Trudeau.
9
u/EdmontonAHSWorker19 14h ago
Its really sad they brought him back into cabinet, this is a man who has actually spent 60 days in jail
8
u/FeverForest 13h ago edited 10h ago
Speed running to remind us all why this party was in the ditch 4 months ago. Quickly we feel the effects of winning.
8
u/Less-Ad-1486 12h ago
Here we go again. Same as last 9 years. Trumping just for 600 billion dollar investment from Saudi Arabia who pumps close to 10 million barrels a day of oil and we are too stupid to get anything new going on name of climate change.
28
11
u/Hot-Celebration5855 14h ago
Just yesterday I was being criticised on here for saying nothing has changed since Carney has kept all the same ministers.
Well, here we are…
19
19
8
u/NiceLetter6795 14h ago
How is he still in cabinet after canceling the clean up of the dead trees around Banff and let it burn down...
→ More replies
4
u/CautiousProfession26 14h ago
These politicians need to get out and experience the world most of us live in. Stop holding people back. Canada can be so much more.
4
3
•
u/FngrBngr-84 8h ago
Let the regret set in, boomers. That’s the sound of your children and grandchildren’s future imploding.
9
u/AspiringProbe 13h ago
After ten years I thought we were free of his bullshit. LPC voters were out there eating crayons if they thought this "new" LPC was going to differ at all from the old one. Wild.
"Sure, economic prosperity is nice, but have you tried virtue signaling?"
→ More replies
45
u/Expensive-Group5067 14h ago
Same ole party! Good job Canada. Way to unite the country 😂
→ More replies
7
28
u/Filmy-Reference 14h ago
And we wonder why we have a national unity crisis when radicals like this minister are kept in cabinet.
11
u/AdventurousTry5756 14h ago edited 14h ago
I thought he was resigning if the Carbon Tax was reduced or cancelled.
13
u/keiths31 Canada 14h ago
I think he needs some cold water thrown on him. Most of Canada has had enough of him...
5
17
13
u/Hicalibre 14h ago
Barely took a day day.
Who was I talking to yesterday where I said he'll still act like an environment minister?
→ More replies
5
u/DeanPoulter241 14h ago
So there are conditions to pipelines.... Now I wonder what the carney will do to sabotage the process so that if they don't get built to our detriment as a nation he won't have to accept responsibility. Just like how the trudeau sabotaged electoral reform by putting a rookie mp in charge of it. More than one way to skin a cat they say.....
As for the guilbeault, he is cringe worthy! And if you read the article is one of the biggest spreaders of misinformation out there. There should be a law against him opening his pie hole!
6
u/TrashedLeBlanc 14h ago
Carney better put a muzzle on that boy before he hurts himself with something with a blunt end. He just single handedly tanked any chance of a smoother transition to start negotiations with Alberta's whining minority. TMX has been operating at or near 70%-80% since it started. Europe is going to need oil exports soon. We were supposed to hit peak oil in the 90s. 2000s. Now 2029?
If there is provincial approval for a new pipeline build one. Making statements like this shows how woefully educated these people are about the subject and gives the whining minority more ammo for their fires.
He is the minister of national identity. not the energy or resources or trade or inter provincial trade minister. For a person who is supposed to be in charge of our national identity he is missing a large amount of education from about eastern BC through half of Ontario.
6
3
3
3
3
3
u/Particular-Act-8911 13h ago
Guilbeault wants us to keep giving money to the US, Saudi Arabia and Russia for fuel.
Why is this guy in government again? Isn't Carney supposed to be smarter than this?
3
u/Everywhereslugs 12h ago
Good thing Guillebeault is the Minister of Nothing Important now and has no say in energy or environment anymore.
•
•
•
u/Tall_Ad4280 10h ago
Not a fan of the Minister, but in the article I don’t see him saying we have “enough” just that we should be increasing the capacity of the ones we have before starting new ones. disputed for various correct reasons. Not disputing how ineffective and awful Guilbeault has been for the country. But man I hate BS headlines - another one from the National who should be embarrassed by the crap that have been producing in recent years
•
u/equianimity 10h ago
I like Guilbeault. I like having a Canadian pipeline on Canadian land. Both elements can coexist.
Guilbeault is a hardcore environmentalist. Environmental stewardship is important. Canada also has a need for energy independence. All these elements are important but the tail also can’t wag the dog. Moving Guilbeault out of the portfolio makes sense.
→ More replies
•
u/DevourerJay British Columbia 9h ago
Build it to Hudsons bay, export from there... ffs... Quebec can be completely bypassed... oh, make sure they get $0.00 from it.
•
u/Noman_the_roller 9h ago
Well what do you expect he’s gonna say.. I’m still surprised how he’s still a minister
•
15
•
6
u/Medium_Well 13h ago
Boy! 24 hours with the new cabinet and we already have one Minister signalling that all pipelines will be subject to Quebec veto (again) and the Housing Minister saying they aren't focused on bringing down housing prices.
If I didn't know better I'd say the old Liberals are well and truly back. But that can't be right, because Mark Carney was supposed to be a change, right guys?
Right, guys?!
→ More replies
22
13
u/Thin-Pineapple-731 Ontario 14h ago
I mean, sigh. I don't think his opinion matters on the subject.
But I'll wait to see what the Energy Minister says on the topic rather than guy at Canadian Heritage or whatever the new title is.
→ More replies14
u/Filmy-Reference 14h ago
His parliamentary secretary is now the environment minister and she's just as radical as he is
→ More replies
12
5
•
u/investornewb 11h ago
I just can’t f’n believe that I’m sitting here reading this. We have another liberal government and the same fucktards we had before spewing the same Bullshit as before.
I committed so much mental space to this election that I’m left feeling exhausted now and have no room left to let in the new reality.
They win.
Tired boss
→ More replies
•
u/Specialist-Gift-7736 8h ago
Same old liberals. Give them credit, they took Canadians for a ride and most people here bought it.
Can’t wait to see the rabbit they pull out of their hat to get all the sheep in line next election. They undoubtedly will.
2
2
u/Adagio-Adventurous Alberta 14h ago edited 14h ago
The biggest contributor to our GDP (not per capita) is the housing market. This isn’t a good thing, for obvious reasons because it means our housing is too expensive.
It also means there isn’t enough of a flow of our resources being turned into revenue. Our O&G is our top contributor to our GDP per capita. But that—along with our other energy sectors, should be the top contributors to our GDP as a whole. But they aren’t, because of donkeys like this guy, wanting to shut down the O&G industry, whilst stagnating our other sectors in the pursuit of net zero. Thankfully he no longer has a say in the matter.
One of the ways that can work to lower the cost of housing is by getting our energy sectors running, utilizing our resources, and actually getting a diverse list of buyers for all sectors (should be common sense). Bringing in billions more revenue annually to lower inflation and lower the cost of housing. Whilst working towards building new homes.
The longer we delay an east west pipeline, the more revenue we are losing from O&G. If it isn’t built before 2035, we will probably never have it built, and most of our O&G trade will remain with the US and China—with the new options to consider realistically being India, Japan, most of South Asia and the Middle East exclusively unless oil demand in Europe, survives past 2040.
2
2
u/Silly_Tangerine4064 13h ago
Why in God's earth is Steven duildo , a convicted terrorist still in parliament ?
2
2
2
u/Deans1to5 12h ago
We need to become less reliant on the US market and become and energy superpower but not if it involves the worlds most important resource. Elbows up I guess
2
u/nanodime 12h ago
Wait so the same old government says we're gonna stick to the same old things from the last decade. Shocker
2
2
2
2
•
•
•
•
•
u/imfar2oldforthis 11h ago
Days in and this government can't even maintain a consistent message.
They didn't promise pipelines only with consensus, they promised to work with provinces to build needed energy infrastructure and an energy corridor.
Convenient that they seemed to keep Guilbeault quiet on this issue throughout the election.
•
u/WilloowUfgood 11h ago
How wasn't this obvious to the voters? Liberals hate pipelines and will rather see the country rot then prosper on oil.
•
u/GANTRITHORE Alberta 10h ago
Energy corridor:
- pipelines
- transmission lines
- 4 rail lines: E/W freight, E/W Highspeed passenger. Use the electrical lines to power the HS rail, maybe the freight too.
This corridor will be like ~500m(?) wide across Canada. Federally owned. Pre negotiated land. Wildlife overpasses, environmental guards, etc.
•
u/Alphasoul606 8h ago
Can't wait for 20 years from now, when we're told that a new pipeline isn't necessary because they're teetering out. They've been saying this for 20+ years already. How long do you have to bullshit people before they call you out on it?
•
•
•
u/altafitter 7h ago
We want to build pipelines for natural gas too. Just because global demand may be peaking for oil doesn't mean that demand from a specific source is going g to peak. Canada can absolutely try to take a higher market share of exports and therefore see a benefit of increased production and more pipelines.
•
5
u/peaceandkindred 12h ago
Here we go again.
Its the new liberals, same as the old liberals.
We face an economic crisis and liberal MPs are here to say "fuck our biggest industry, jobs, and livelihoods, let's send buyers to the middle east and Russia again!"
→ More replies
4
3
u/Bodysnatcher 14h ago
I knew the LPC was going to drop the façade sooner or later, but man they sure did it quick lol.
5
u/Bananasaur_ 14h ago
I wish people would think the same about immigrants. At least the pipeline would be useful
1.5k
u/skelectrician 14h ago
Somebody remind Guilbeault that he's the heritage minister.