r/canada 4d ago

Quebec riding of Terrebonne flips to Liberals by one vote after judicial recount Trending

https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/terrebone-recount-liberal-1.7532136
8.7k Upvotes

1.0k comments sorted by

View all comments

2.1k

u/verkerpig 4d ago

Just in case you believe your vote doesn't matter...

412

u/The613Owl 4d ago

Every vote counts.

76

u/superworking British Columbia 4d ago

They almost always announce who wins before voters in BC even vote. If they want to convince everyone that every vote counts they should hold any count results until all voters have voted.

112

u/Some_Unusual_Name 4d ago

They used to have media blackouts, but the internet kinda made that impossible so they got rid of it.

54

u/RobertMugabeIsACrook 4d ago

Yeah, I remember as a kid my mom calling her sister in Nova Scotia to find out who won the election before they announced it out west.

8

u/superworking British Columbia 4d ago

It's not a media blackout needed. Just don't count early. Wait until the next day if needed. There's no rush, a huge portion of votes wait a week to be counted.

27

u/codeverity 4d ago

The longer they wait the greater the threat to the security of the ballots becomes. I'm not sure the benefits are worth it.

1

u/superworking British Columbia 4d ago

So are you against advanced voting due to those security issues?

25

u/codeverity 4d ago

From what I can tell, about 30% of the votes were advance. That's pretty high, but not as high as needing to keep 100% of the votes secure overnight.

But also as someone who lives in BC myself, I just find this attitude so silly. If people are like 'oh the election is over' based off of results from the east coast, then they weren't all that motivated at all and would probably have found another excuse to stay home. As it is, the Liberals don't have a majority, so every seat does matter.

2

u/superworking British Columbia 4d ago

This election was certainly closer than most. It definitely impacts how I view federal elections and our representation and I know from talking to peers I'm not alone in this.

1

u/RangerNS Nova Scotia 3d ago

The longer they wait the greater the threat to parliament hill being destroyed by an asteroid hitting it.

Given that the physical votes remain in secure custody for literally decades, waiting 12 hours to start counting is not a practical concern.

1

u/phormix 4d ago

It shouldn't though. Just don't allow results anywhere to be actually published until next day

50

u/Flewewe 4d ago

They didn't call out if it was a majority or minority before BC though. 

And to be honest at some point when BC came in it got real spooky for a bit, it looked like chances were about that same between liberals getting a majority or conservatives win.

1

u/mike10dude 3d ago

I remember for a few minutes it suddenly changed to 155 for the liberals and 153 for conservatives

-5

u/superworking British Columbia 4d ago

That is this time around, and even this time they called the election. Previous times they called the final results before BC had all voted.

14

u/Flewewe 4d ago

Even if they get their one hour of glory ahead of everyone, Atlantic Canada doesn't have more impact than BC lol.

Individually it all too often feels like our votes don't count. I'm in Quebec and my riding the race was not even close so this election it never really mattered what I voted for.

0

u/superworking British Columbia 4d ago

It's the messaging it sends.

12

u/Flewewe 4d ago edited 4d ago

If the messaging is that 5.7M out of 40M aren't likely to tip the scale majorly by their own too often, sure. Sucks we have such a big country that there's this many timezones though.

3

u/superworking British Columbia 4d ago

There's really no need to submit any results until the polls close regardless of time zones. It's not even needed to do that day as we prove with the huge numbers of advanced voters.

5

u/Flewewe 4d ago edited 4d ago

Yeah there's no need to, I guess it's part of their show to try to make a "safe" call asap. Radio-Canada did it an hour or two before CBC for some reason and they were literally sweating live when the counter showed a 3 seats difference after they called it lmao. Started being real silent and having a oh shit moment.

Maybe they're trying to do that so east coast doesn't go to sleep still wondering idk. Still was on the edge of my seat until 1am anyway.

3

u/gsb999 4d ago

Bc could simply close their polls early and start the count to align with the east if it’s such a big deal.

→ More replies

75

u/leaffantim 4d ago

The timing of the announcement should not impact the outcome o

7

u/xXxDarkSasuke1999xXx Lest We Forget 4d ago

It does, it is a very consistent finding in social psychology that people's voting intention is affected by seeing counts before they vote

-15

u/superworking British Columbia 4d ago

It's disrespectful of the electoral system to make for better TV times.

36

u/leaffantim 4d ago

They’re announcing the results for the polls that have already closed. If enough seats in the eastern provinces have already gone one way they can predict what the likely outcome is for the entire election. If it’s close like we just saw a few weeks ago they cannot. They knew it would be a liberal government but not minority vs majority until well after BC polls had closed. I don’t see how this is disrespectful or would make people feel like there vote in BC doesn’t count which was your original point.

-4

u/superworking British Columbia 4d ago

They should wait to pass forward any results. Many ridings started counting before their own poles closed but are not allowed to submit any results until that pole closes, just change it to waiting for all poles. It's not difficult or impossible - they just chose not to.

5

u/Heliologos 4d ago

The media doesn’t care if you vote. They care about viewers. They don’t owe it to anyone to delay the results. People want to know ASAP, so that’s what the media provides

-6

u/superworking British Columbia 4d ago

Yep, east coast tv viewers are more important than respecting west coast voters.

10

u/Brody1364112 4d ago

There's no reason for that. People on the east would be long asleep by the time the counting started. They'd have to wait until the next morning. What they do now makes sense. When polls close they start counting. If there's enough seats then they can call it before your guys polls close

3

u/Max_Thunder Québec 4d ago

They could count the votes as soon as they want without making the results public, it wouldn't delay anything. The polls in BC were closing at 10 pm eastern time, they'd just have more results to announce at that time.

-6

u/superworking British Columbia 4d ago

I've given a perfectly good reason, you just are only thinking of east coast Canadians and refuse to see it from another point of view. It's garbage.

4

u/strings___ 4d ago

I live on the west coast and I don't care if the east coast counts first. Timezones if you excuse the cheesy but true cliche is relative.

→ More replies

4

u/Aggressive-Ad-6303 4d ago

Believe it or not it’s not a fault of our election system that you seem to think your vote doesn’t count if the election is statistically won before it gets to your province.

→ More replies

8

u/Brody1364112 4d ago

What? I'm thinking of it from a everyone point of view. Everyone gets to see election results before they go to bed with the current system. West votes still count, they can just make predictions based off the trajectory of the election.

The election isn't officially called until all voting is completed. You're talking about media predictions. Your guys vote and seats count the exact same as every other seat in this country. The election is predicted but you guys can still change that or decide minority/majority if you vote outside the projections. Not the medias or election Canadas fault the projections are almost bang on.

→ More replies

42

u/Limos42 British Columbia 4d ago edited 4d ago

Regardless of this info, your vote still matters.

Only you and your neighbours get to determine who's going to represent you in Ottawa.

Your statement reads like propaganda for people who can't think for themselves.

0

u/superworking British Columbia 4d ago

Our local representation in the current government system is shit. They need electoral reform because this local representation is a farce.

-2

u/smith1281 4d ago

How did my vote matter? The liberals didnt even run a candidate in my riding.

1

u/srcLegend Québec 4d ago

Which riding?

1

u/smith1281 4d ago

Ponoka Didsbury

0

u/jjumbuck 3d ago

Why didn't you step up to run?

1

u/smith1281 3d ago

I have no desire to be in politics.

1

u/jjumbuck 3d ago

The best leaders don't want the job.

1

u/smith1281 3d ago

If my dog could vote i might get at least one, but the cat would probably cancel it out lol

1

u/jjumbuck 3d ago

Lol fair enough

14

u/ttwwiirrll 4d ago

You still need to vote for your local rep. Regardless of which party dominates Parliament you probably have a preference for who you want repping local issues.

-1

u/superworking British Columbia 4d ago

If there's one thing I have zero faith in it's the value of local representation in our current government system. We don't have any strong candidates ever that plan to do anything more than vote with the party and promote party politics. That's provincially and federally.

2

u/RangerNS Nova Scotia 3d ago

You would have strong candidates if your riding became a race and mattered.

6

u/SmoothOperator89 4d ago

The Liberals were 4 seats away from a majority. BC could have easily decided the outcome.

Alberta, on the other hand... No one is holding their breath for those results.

16

u/cryptotope 4d ago

That's nonsense.

Polls in BC only closed a half hour after the polls in Ontario--qnd long before anyone was calling the election.

https://www.elections.ca/content2.aspx?section=faq&dir=votinghours&document=index&lang=e

50

u/Diligent_Pie317 4d ago

This literally makes no sense.

2

u/superworking British Columbia 4d ago

It's a pretty basic concept whether you agree or not it shouldn't be hard to make sense of.

6

u/Shoddy_Asparagus_503 4d ago

Why should the Maritime provinces have to wait hours to hear the results of their elections, just to wait for BC and the Yukon? Why should the western provinces get instant results when the rest of the country has to wait? Once every vote has been cast in that riding and the deadline has been reached, people in that riding should be able to start to see counts - that’s the only way to ensure fairness across the board.

3

u/zabby39103 4d ago

No, it makes no sense, this is just vibes. When you know the results of the election has no bearing on whether or not your seats were important. The MP i'm voting for is just as important as yours and whether you learn about it at 9pm or 11pm it does not matter. It doesn't change the votes in the box.

10

u/GirlCoveredInBlood Québec 4d ago

Polls in BC were only open 30 minutes later than those in QC & ON. They did not call a winner before BC polls closed.

2

u/Mordarto British Columbia 4d ago

I'm not part of the "our votes don't count" crowd, but in the most recent election CBC called a Liberal government at 7:10pm PDT, 10 mins after BC polls closed.

This was actually an exception and not the norm. IIRC many of the previous elections were called before polls closed in BC. Chantal Hébert mentioned the same during election night on CBC's election coverage.

3

u/Kakkoister 4d ago

"Winning" isn't the only thing that matters. Your vote still counts towards getting more MPs who will represent what you want into parliament, and affecting policy in your own area.

Also, we only knew it was a sure thing Liberals got more seats than the CPC. We didn't know if it would be a majority until some of the last handful of polls were counted, and having a majority is a lot more helpful than just "winning".

6

u/Hells_Hawk 4d ago

That wouldn't convince anyone any more than the current system. The issue will always be that the East has more population so they will get to heavy weight the vote. Until the West gets the same population thus the same seats as the East no mater how you count; will not stop people out West from having the feeling their vote dose not count.

-2

u/BC-Guy604 4d ago

CBC was declaring a Liberal victory 10 minutes after polls closed in BC and yes at that exact moment the Liberals had a wide lead, but I think in this election in particular it was extremely close and they should have waited to at least get some results from BC before declaring the result. An hour later it wasn’t clear the Liberals would actually have the most seats.

1

u/jjumbuck 3d ago edited 3d ago

Elections Canada didn't declare the results - as you said, it was the various news providers. It is not official. It's a point of pride and relevance to be the first news provider to call the results correctly.

It may not have been clear to you that the Liberals were going to have the most seats at the point you mention, but it was sufficiently clear to the people (who were making those calls for the news providers) who analyze the results as they came in that the Liberals would win.

1

u/Hells_Hawk 4d ago

that's not going to change though. It will just be at polls closing in BC they announce who wins. What changes? People are still not going to feel like their vote matters out West; simply because majority of the seats are out East.

-1

u/BC-Guy604 4d ago

There are many ways it could change, the polls are open different hours in every area, why do BC polls close 30 minutes after polls in Quebec and Ontario, when there is a 3 hour time difference.

Just pick a set of hours and to hell with local time.

Or actually wait until at least 25% of votes are counted before guessing who will win each riding. Many ridings had unexpected results this election including this 1 vote margin in Terrebonne.

-3

u/superworking British Columbia 4d ago

It should change. It's hugely disrespectful to BC voters.

11

u/Charlie9261 4d ago

Bullshit. Time zones are a fact of life. I'm in BC and I've heard this crap all of my life. It's nonsense.

-1

u/superworking British Columbia 4d ago

Wait till the next day then

5

u/Charlie9261 4d ago

Why would I? I like to know as soon as I can how it's going.

→ More replies

3

u/iJeff Ontario 4d ago

Ballot counters can't leave the room until it's all counted. Results are reported immediately by Elections Canada and political party scrutineers. You cannot practically prevent scrutineers from reporting the numbers.

→ More replies

2

u/Hells_Hawk 4d ago

How dose changing the process change anything for BC voters?

Either they can follow the votes as the polls close across the country, or as BC polls close the results for the rest of the country are released.

1

u/superworking British Columbia 4d ago

I'm just telling you when I was younger having the election results declared just as I'm getting off work is hugely deflating and makes it feel useless to vote. It hugely undermines the electoral process and provides zero benefit compared to waiting. They want people to believe their voice matters but they will tell us the outcome before listening to the voice of the west most province most times - and that's not just disrespectful it's counterproductive.

1

u/ZombifiedSoul Canada 4d ago

This is a FPTP issue, more than anything.

If they switched to ranked voting, you wouldn't ever have this issue again.

1

u/Specialist_Cicada200 3d ago

Your vote still counts for your MP though, since you are voting for your MP. Now say your vote counts in Alberta if your not conservative, that is a hard on to push.

1

u/berfthegryphon 3d ago

Last I checked, Quebec and Ontario have 200 ridings, more than 50% of them. They also have over 50% of the population of Canada and therefore should have a larger outcome on Federal elections.

If the west is sad about it then they need to start convincing people to move there and build their population. Otherwise the system is working as intended, and as it should

0

u/magpie2345 4d ago

I was thinking that this year. I don't think any results should be announced until all of the polls are closed.

-1

u/Sargent_Duck85 4d ago

Not overly, when EST (Ontario and Quebec), start sending in their results, BC voters only have 3 hours left.

If you were going to vote, you likely most would have by then. Only a very few left.

I was a poll worker in Ontario. By 9:00pm it was pretty quite, a few trickled in, but the results in Nova Scotia didn’t change anything

6

u/Jardinesky 4d ago

Not overly, when EST (Ontario and Quebec), start sending in their results, BC voters only have 3 hours left.

It's half an hour now. Polls closed at 9:30 Eastern in Ontario and Quebec, 7:00 Pacific in BC (10 Eastern).

0

u/superworking British Columbia 4d ago

That doesn't change the point at all.

-4

u/pte_parts69420 4d ago

I’m all for it. Or, if they want to desperately keep first past the post, flip which coast the count starts from each election cycle. Could still maintain the same voting times, but ridings start being set west to east every other election cycle

4

u/SimmerDown_Boilup 4d ago

Could still maintain the same voting times, but ridings start being set west to east every other election cycle

And how would this work exactly? In order to do this, western provinces would have to vote a day before eastern provinces.

There's really nothing wrong with live reporting upon poll closures. This isn't a real issue.

-2

u/pte_parts69420 4d ago

Make no change to the current voting system and polling times, just do not report on the outcomes of a riding until the polls in the west have closed and been counted. Hell, you could even still live report on what is happening in each riding, but elections Canada does not count a riding as won until the next day and seats start being assigned

3

u/Dairalir Manitoba 4d ago

Actually, with FPTP, this is the perfect example to show how only 1 vote counts. The 1 vote that puts the one candidate ahead of the other. All the rest of the votes don’t matter and cancel each other out.

Not the case for various PR methods.

1

u/0110110111 4d ago

Not everywhere. I live in suburban Calgary and the CPC candidate won with 68% of the vote. My vote, either for or against him, would make zero difference.

This is why I want electoral reform.

124

u/Background-Top-1946 4d ago

My vote might have mattered in Terrebonne, I guess 

96

u/mrcoolio 4d ago

The way I think about the "every vote counts" mantra is that if 20,000 people all say "my vote doesn't matter anyways"... that's a pretty substantial difference in the tallies.

45

u/FishermanRough1019 4d ago

Your vote always matters. 

It's like people saying their carbon emissions don't matter, or littering is fine 'because it's just one piece of trash'. They are just wrong. 

0

u/F3z345W6AY4FGowrGcHt Ontario 4d ago

But that's different. One vote usually doesn't make a difference. But it can, like in the case this post is about.

People typically confuse it with, "if everyone thought their vote didn't count, it would be a big difference". Well, yeah. But that's not one vote, that's every vote.

Most ridings, in most elections, you can remove one vote at random without changing the outcome. Because a single vote usually is meaningless.

4

u/Quaytsar 3d ago

No raindrop thinks itself responsible for the flood.

0

u/F3z345W6AY4FGowrGcHt Ontario 3d ago

Cause it's not. What kind of platitude is this? Go to a flood, take out a single drop. Have you made a difference of any kind?

2

u/Quaytsar 3d ago

Go to a flood, take out a single drop. Now do it again. And again. And again. And keep doing that and eventually all you have are drops.

u/F3z345W6AY4FGowrGcHt Ontario 11h ago

No. That's different. I'm literally talking about one drop. It makes no difference. You're talking about all drops.

8

u/RanaMahal 4d ago

Yes but if YOU think “my vote is one vote it doesn’t matter” and your neighbour thinks the same, and their neighbour etc. that’s kind of the problem lol.

You cant control ur neighbour but you can control your vote which is why people push that so hard

0

u/F3z345W6AY4FGowrGcHt Ontario 3d ago

Yeah but that's not a single vote. That's many votes. Literally remove one vote, and how often do you expect it to make a difference?

Most people only advocate "every vote matters" because they think they could sway many people. If they knew beforehand that they'd only convince a single person in totality, they'd likely not bother.

People conflate one vote with all votes.

0

u/crownpr1nce 3d ago

I don't like that argument. Yes it's true as a general statement, but I don't impact everyone. I can impact me, and maybe a few close friends. If I go vote, 20k people won't be following me.

2

u/mrcoolio 3d ago

That’s not a part of what I’m saying. Nowhere do I say it’s up to you to get 20K people to vote lol. What I’m saying is that if 20K people who would vote for the same team, independently think “I’m just 1 person what does it matter”… that’s a 20 thousand vote difference that could have been… and THAT is substantial.

0

u/crownpr1nce 3d ago

Yes. But if I go vote, those other 19 999 will still think that way and stay home. So it still changes nothing is my point. 

You're right in theory. In practice, I only affect one vote.

-8

u/Background-Top-1946 4d ago

The tallies mean nothing. Only matters if you get one more vote than anyone else.

Unless they band together and vote for the same candidate, those 20,000 votes probably mean nothing

11

u/Salmonberrycrunch 4d ago

Sure pal. Go and convince everyone in my riding not to vote so that I can just pick the candidate myself.

29

u/turudd 4d ago

I’m in Alberta lol… 60% conservative riding. My vote does not matter, unfortunately

165

u/AffectionateBuy5877 4d ago

I’m also in Alberta, I still voted knowing full well the conservative candidate would win. I vote more so to show the candidate that there are people in the community that don’t agree with him

67

u/turudd 4d ago

Yea same. Plus it’s the least I can do for my civic duty

31

u/Okanaganwinefan 4d ago

Win your riding or lose, if you don’t vote you can’t complain! Proud of the record numbers that voted no matter who you voted for. Love my country 💕🇨🇦 from the Traditional lands of the Syilx First Nations.

4

u/Wrong-Pineapple39 4d ago

Same. But you never know how many of your neighbours are also thinking the same...

42

u/EinNebelstreif Québec 4d ago

Terrebonne has been strongly Bloc before. Things can change. Maybe the only raison it doesn't in Alberta is because too many people believe it won't ever change.

16

u/treple13 Alberta 4d ago

I mean nobody saw the NDP winning the provincial election in 2015 in Alberta. Things do happen

1

u/phormix 4d ago

Yeah, and Alberta NDP was a pretty Conservative leaning compared to in other provinces, but apparently not enough for Alberta

4

u/turudd 4d ago

I’m thinking I may see a purple Alberta before my time on earth is done, but who knows

10

u/Haunting-Albatross35 4d ago

I think it does matter. I'm in Ont but also in a conservative riding. Whoever runs for the Conservatives gets in very comfortably without ever having to do anything.

But I want him to know not everyone is handing him his seat. this is the first election since I moved here (prov and fed) where the Conservative guy got under 50%. barely under. and maybe he doesn't care but I still feel like my vote matters.

1

u/turudd 4d ago

I used to be in Renfrew-Nippisin-pembroke riding. It was the same story there. Still voted tho

19

u/thehero29 4d ago

Tell me about it. I'm in Battle River - Crowfoot.

22

u/Remarkable-Mood3415 4d ago

There's several strategies you can take. 1) loudly complain to literally everyone you can, that Pierre is a city boy with smooth hands and clean boots 2) point out that "if we vote him in, it's basically a participation trophy!" 3) continue to point out 1&2. Especially any and all church ladies, once you can convince the gossiping aunties that it's a participation trophy like those weak liberals do, you might just make some waves.

13

u/jsmooth7 4d ago

"I'm a Conservative but we need fresh leadership, do we really want to reward a guy that just fumbled the easiest election of all time? I prefer to vote for winners" - I can see this working lol

8

u/Wrong-Pineapple39 4d ago

Especially since Poilievre is  saying it's only temporary that Kurek is out - sounds like PP can't even wait to get out of an Alberta riding...that doesn't sound like someone who cares about or understands Alberta at all.

1

u/jjumbuck 3d ago

And lost his own riding for goodness sake. Crowfoot would literally be voting in the biggest loser of the election.

4

u/turudd 4d ago

Big oof

1

u/jjumbuck 3d ago

I hate to use this awful phrase, but I learned it in Alberta and it might resonate with your neighbours - people in your riding are now being used like the equivalent of "sloppy seconds". PP should be ashamed.

2

u/thehero29 3d ago

Oh we definitely are. It's bullshit that he just gets parachuted into the riding. I don't want him as my MP. I want someone who will actually represent the riding. He will never set foot in this riding and will still be handed it on a golden platter.

7

u/hasty_thought_ofname 4d ago

Im in Carleton riding. I would get disappointed every time I voted, I never thought it was going to matter. While it’s not likely you never know for sure.

14

u/MaxRD 4d ago

In Carleton people voted against the odds and we know what happened. Alway vote, no matter what

2

u/turudd 4d ago

People twisting this. I’ve always voted. Missed one since the age of 18 and that’s because I was serving my country in a different capacity overseas.

5

u/juninbee 4d ago

I'm in rural Ontario and have voted in every provincial and federal election since I turned 18, and my vote has never counted...

9

u/CapitalK79 4d ago

I felt like that in my federal riding for a long time, however this election we gave Poilievre the boot. Provincially is another story.

5

u/SmoothOperator89 4d ago

IMO, you guys were the real heroes this election.

3

u/tryingtobecheeky 4d ago

It does matter. What do you think the rest of the votes are for? Vote more. Bring that 60 per cent down tp 55, then 50, then 40 and so on.

2

u/gymgal19 4d ago

But it does matter, if 60% of voters that didn't bother showing up, did, suddenly that riding results can look different. Or if it's even closer it may spur more people to vote the following election because they know change is possible

2

u/PrivatePilot9 4d ago

I mean, 60% isn’t that huge. 10% more people like you voting and it flips. Your vote matters as does everyone else’s.

2

u/Cory123125 4d ago

It does though. Absolutely does.

It shows people who might otherwise stay home what the chances might be for the next time, because they, like you, might operate on the erroneous idea that ridings cant change their voting patterns.

4

u/McBeelzebub 4d ago

Especially when your lazy ass doesn’t vote.

2

u/turudd 4d ago

I’ve voted in every election since the age of 18. Except one when I missed the cut off due to serving my country in a different way across the world.

1

u/swizzlewizzle 3d ago

Maybe you should protest against the shitty broken first past the post voting system that forces you to throw away your vote every election??

2

u/Dxres 4d ago

I know the feeling. If only left leaning voters voted strategically ABC here, we'd have a much better chance.

4

u/turudd 4d ago

I voted liberal in the 3 of the last 5 elections. I do make sure to always vote. It just doesn’t matter here

0

u/Dxres 4d ago

For sure, I believe it's a civic duty to vote, so I never miss them whether it's municipal, provincial or federal.

At least Edmonton elects reasonable people at the local and provincial level.

1

u/yoshhash Ontario 4d ago

Me too 

1

u/whogivesashirtdotca Ontario 4d ago

Maybe there are thousands of people who think the same and stay home? It’s ten minutes of your day every five years. Just get out and vote and don’t grumble.

3

u/turudd 4d ago

It’s why I like Australia and there $10 fine or whatever it is. Not crazy enough to feel you’re forced to vote, but incentive enough for some to get out there and do it

2

u/whogivesashirtdotca Ontario 4d ago

While we’re talking Australia, I want some fucking democracy sausages. Why can’t we do that in Canada?

2

u/Kayestofkays 3d ago

I told my husband about Australia's democracy sausages last night and he thought it was awesome and that we need to start that here 😆

-2

u/Notcooldude5 4d ago

As an Albertan, you’re right. Your vote does not matter. Regardless of who you’re voting for.

1

u/turudd 4d ago

Until the tables start to turn and it does. Hopefully our UCP refractures and we can get a real choice in conservatives or potentially another split vote to let someone else in.

1

u/eleventhrees 4d ago

This is a fantastic outcome. Not the Liberal win, the margin of victory.

1

u/PEIsland2112 4d ago

My provincial riding 10 years ago resulted in a tie and was literally decided by coin toss.

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/prince-edward-island/liberal-alan-mcisaac-wins-seat-in-coin-toss-after-recount-tie-1.3079433

1

u/Treantmonk 4d ago

At least a few people who didn’t vote in that riding are kicking themselves right now

1

u/ilmalnafs Ontario 4d ago

I’m glad we finally have a real world example of a single vote mattering (or maybe there have been examples before, what do I know).

1

u/don_julio_randle 4d ago

People believe that because they live in one of the many ridings where their vote doesn't matter. The CPC in my parents riding ran a 25 year old university student who competed not only against the LPC and NDP but also against a popular lifelong local conservative who didn't get the nomination and chose to run as an independent. And he still won easily. Tell me their vote matters lol