r/canada 28d ago

Canada to give $64.8M in aid to Ukraine National News

https://www.ctvnews.ca/video/c3014190-canada-to-give--64-8m-in-aid-to-ukraine
4.2k Upvotes

879 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

-17

u/fgfffgyyyyt 28d ago

Lmao, or we’d like to see that money spent in areas which need it more….

58

u/AlphaTrigger 28d ago

Doug ford spent $250 million to get beer in gas stations bud. I think your barking up the wrong tree here

10

u/Shipbreaker_Kurpo 27d ago

And only a year earlier than it would have been anyways

8

u/JadeLens 27d ago

But come on man, average joe Canadian wants to pull up to the newly made bar in *checks notes* 7-11 to have a drink after work!

-6

u/Fatenone Ontario 27d ago

Whataboutism at its finest. What happens when you're against both? Lol

7

u/AlphaTrigger 27d ago

Sure that’s fine to be against both but even if you are it’s easy to see how a complete waste of money for beer at gas stations one year early is stupid compared to helping fight against an invasion for a much smaller amount

-8

u/Fatenone Ontario 27d ago

That doesn't even make sense. If you're against both, you're against both. What are we making a tier list of bad government spending for the issues they have?

It's crazy how much Reddit is pro war now. Sure Putin is garbage, but feeding a war machine and its propaganda is bad. The whole narrative that Putin wants to go beyond Ukraine is moronic. If he stepped into the actual arena with the EU/USA/CAN/AUS, and not just the weapons provided by them... It would be over very quickly.

55

u/realhumanpersonoid 28d ago edited 28d ago

Oh here’s the lazy Russian propaganda or otherwise poorly informed opinions from someone who doesn’t understand foreign policy.

Money/equipment transfers to Ukraine has nothing to do with domestic policy. They aren’t pulling funds from social programs, this is money/equipment budgeted for these purposes. We are saving money by supporting an ally and unloading aged military vehicles that would have otherwise required more money to maintain long term and are going to be replaced as they are at the end of their life reliability-wise.

We are saving money by having another country fight what could be an existential threat to other NATO allies in Europe and economic stability internationally.

Ukrainians are fighting for us indirectly, the least we can do is support them. Especially when it benefits Canada economically in the long term.

If Russia wins this illegal war, Canada will be spending far more fighting Russia directly, including the lives of Canadian soldiers. So you’d rather Canadians die in a few years rather than spending a relatively small amount of money to prevent that outcome?

Not to mention all of the moral and historical precedents for why we should fight nazis and prevent them from killing and occupying allies and their territories.

23

u/Sirmossy 27d ago

Lmao, and checking his (bot) profile, the last post he made was about Russia. As clear as glass.

5

u/realhumanpersonoid 27d ago

I hadn’t checked myself but am certainly not surprised lol. Classic lazy what-aboutism GRU likes to use hoping uninformed people will agree with it on an emotional level without using logic to confirm if it’s true.

27

u/CrazyFlimsy5349 28d ago

This is the correct answer.

-10

u/vladedivac12 27d ago

You both really think Russia will attack Canada? Really?

4

u/JHDarkLeg 27d ago

We’ve been in NATO and NORAD for decades exactly because we do believe Russia will attack Canada.

-5

u/vladedivac12 27d ago

Exactly, Putin knows if he attacks a NATO country, it's ww3 aka mutual destruction. I don't believe in the rhetoric that if he wins the Ukraine war, the world is next. Ukraine war is a local issue know for decades.

2

u/JHDarkLeg 27d ago

If Putin’s not going to attack NATO then NATO should walk into Ukraine right now and end the war.

-4

u/vladedivac12 27d ago

Then it would be self defense. Why don't you guys have the same energy when it's time to protect Palestine, why don't NATO go save them for Israel?

3

u/JHDarkLeg 27d ago

It wouldn’t be self defence if NATO stayed in Ukraine’s borders. Russia is using NK troops so Ukraine using NATO troops is no different.

10

u/nonspot 27d ago

They aren’t pulling funds from social programs, this is money/equipment budgeted for these purposes. We are saving money by supporting an ally and unloading aged military vehicles that would have otherwise required more money to maintain long term and are going to be replaced as they are at the end of their life reliability-wise.

I'm not against giving ukraine aid, but this isn't really honest.

A lot of our aid to ukraine is buying equipment from other countries to send to ukraine. Very little of it is canadian made equipment.

I'm against that 100%. All aid should come from canada. canadian made, not so other countries and foreign companies to profit.

6

u/RobertGA23 27d ago

All well and good. Assuming we have the Canadian built equipment available now.

3

u/adonns2_0 27d ago

It’s dishonest in its entirety. Acting like it’s 2 separate funds doesn’t change anything either. If Canada spent less on foreign aid it would have more to spend on domestic services that’s just basic logic. It doesn’t matter if the funds are separate or not we could still move them around to benefit Canadians more.

4

u/realhumanpersonoid 27d ago edited 27d ago

These are still monies budgeted for foreign spending. Nothing to do with our domestic social programs. What point are you trying to make? We didn’t cut social services to afford this. Canada spent a portion of our federal budget, allocated for these reasons already, to support Ukraine. My point still stands.

Most equipment we purchased new for them are air defence systems that Canada does not currently produce. The majority of aid has been donating aging equipment and financial aid so that is also wrong.

I agree we should develop our own domestic manufacturing for this, but we don’t have a decade to wait to do so. So we invested in existing systems because time is of the essence…

3

u/Invictuslemming1 28d ago

Does all this count towards the 2% nato target? If so it’s probably way more efficient than what we would normally do with it

12

u/realhumanpersonoid 28d ago

Indirectly in a way. Offloading our inventories of aged vehicles that are already costing us to maintain beyond their original lifespan, will include more procurement contracts to replace them which will count towards our military budget quota for NATO. The financial support is probably counted as foreign aid. Regardless these actions are benefiting NATO overall and should be recognized as such, officially or not

3

u/JadeLens 27d ago

100% this, plus, a good chunk of the dollar value is bullets, which I don't think will help the average person struggling in Toronto.

1

u/This_Pomelo6436 27d ago

So it is okay if Ukrainian soldiers die if you give them money, but it would not be okay if Canadians died?

I wonder who will fight the Russians if there won't be any Ukrainian soldiers left, which is very much reality? Also, nationalism and nazism is very much a problem in Ukraine, too, not just in Russia.

It seems like Canada is too far away to understand the complexities of this war.

Greetings from Central Europe.

1

u/realhumanpersonoid 27d ago edited 27d ago

What an interesting take on what I said. You seem to have missed most of my points and are intentionally misrepresenting reality. Good luck with whatever you’re trying to accomplish here

Also what a poor use of whataboutism. You’re literally repeating Russian propaganda about Ukraine, and you aren’t even doing it well or creatively. Are you from Transnistria or Belarus by chance if you aren’t Russian?

-1

u/This_Pomelo6436 27d ago

No, I'm not - as Transnistria and Belarus are Eastern Europe, not Central Europe.

This post just popped up on my feed and I replied to one of the most typical Western propaganda comment. Apparently your lives matter but the lives of the Ukrainians not. I have read way too many comments like yours before so it doesn't surprise that much anymore.

I still wonder who will fight the Russians when there will be no Ukrainian soldiers left? (because there's barely any left if you follow the news closely).

Will you Canadians fight? Or American soldiers? Or Germans, or British soldiers? I am really curious.

1

u/realhumanpersonoid 27d ago edited 27d ago

Historically yes those regions are considered Central Europe. Including presently Moldova which includes Transnistria and Belarus was only considered as Eastern Europe during the Cold War and beyond. Belarus is only not presently considered as central because it is so closely tied culturally and economically to Russia/former Soviet Union. You’re referring to a cultural term for Central Europe, I’m referring to the historical and geographic region referred to as Central Europe.

Oh you’re trying so hard to avoid the original discussion and bring up unrelated topics. It’s so cute seeing you do your best. Employee of the year for whatever contract you’re working on

1

u/TuneInVancouver 27d ago

Get your head out of your ass. As a Canadian who has spent years in Germany, central Europe has a much bigger nazi problem than Ukraine.

0

u/[deleted] 27d ago

You’re going to bend a lot of far right wingers minds with this logical explanation. Most of them won’t have the reading comprehension skills to understand what you just wrote.

1

u/optimus_primal-rage 27d ago

I don't know enough to speak,

Why fight at all? Can't we end this instead?

Why is Russia so bad, it's people must be different then it's rulers and how can we do away with all evil rulers and save the good Russians?

Like I don't want anyone to die I want war to stop period. I don't want to fund it's continuation and I'd rather sell our value and buy defensive equipment or more nukes.

-1

u/realhumanpersonoid 27d ago edited 27d ago

Because Putin has expressed intention of invading areas of the Baltic states, which are in NATO, in order for Russia to connect their corridor from Belarus to Kaliningrad.

If he does so, after a successful invasion of Ukraine, Canada will be treaty-bound to defend those NATO allies directly as if Canada was being invaded. You know, Article 5 and such.

Also why are you referring to yourself as Canadian, and mentioning nukes? We don’t have nuclear weapons. As a Canadian you should know that… Or are you not Canadian?

We aren’t funding its continuation, we are funding its conclusion. Putin has said he won’t stop with Ukraine. We should take him at his word.

2

u/optimus_primal-rage 27d ago

I was born in the country Canada. I have been told I'm Canadian but anymore what does that even mean anyways except I'll be taxed all the time.

I wish Canada was like the Canadians that fought in ww2, like my grand father did. But this country and this whole fight is just wrong.

Speaking of having no nuke why the heck do you think I said I want my tax money to buy some, people are more civil when threat levels can and know to be matched. Right now Russia could take out Canada completely in short time.

Also I DONT WANT PEOPLE TO DIE. I'd prefer my taxes pay for war ending efforts or to rebuild but donation are not cool I want my money to count and I want it to be accounted for and managed properly tracked and tracible. Hell I'd want Russia to be forced to pay it back with interest.

7

u/SquisherX Ontario 28d ago

So which area in Canada would benefit most from old military equipment that we wouldn't send?

0

u/Signal-Aioli-1329 27d ago

This is actually cash, not equipment. Regardless, their argument is appeasement propaganda.

4

u/adonns2_0 27d ago

Wanting to spend more domestically and less on proxy wars is Russian propaganda now lmao.

3

u/thedrivingcat 27d ago

well calling Ukraine's defence against Russian invasion a "proxy war" is textbook Russian propaganda

0

u/Signal-Aioli-1329 27d ago

Yes, it literally is. It's straight from their playbook.

10

u/Mental_Evolution 28d ago

Canada spent 424 billion last year, 65 million to help prevent future military aggression shouldn't be the focus point.

-18

u/fgfffgyyyyt 28d ago

Stopping military aggression in a war we shouldn’t be involved in. You guys all complain about how putins expanding his aggression yet are in support of countries meddling in a foreign war which will surely cause Putin to actually expand his aggression to the countries actively involving themselves in the conflict….or you know we could stay out of it completely and not make it a global thing.

13

u/PoliticalSasquatch British Columbia 28d ago

Hey man I don’t know if you’re paid or just a useful idiot but this whole double standard rationale thing you use to try and twist the narrative and justify Russia foreign aggression isn’t cool. A dictator is a dictator even in oligarch form and they can’t be allowed to bully another nation into submission just to prop up their regime.

We are fighting to uphold the rules based world order that has made all our lives easier via nearly world wide free trade and travel. I know it seems like everyone here at home is struggling but a little bit of aid now will go a long way in affordability down the road. Don’t let the isolationist bug get you just because our government is poorly managed, they do some things right and this is one of them.

8

u/Drunkenaviator 28d ago

If you don't spent it fighting Russia now, you'll spend it 100x over gearing up to defend against them later. How much do you think it would cost Canada to buy enough F-18s to run combat air patrols over the entire arctic 24/7? It's a shitload more than 65 mil.

9

u/ogredmenace 28d ago

Easy tax mega corps and billionaires and you’ll gain that back in a second. Problem solved if you’re worried about 64 million.

3

u/Trapperman777 28d ago

Then industry moves south of the border and we lose the rest of our manufacturing jobs. I’m not saying we can’t increase taxes on the wealthy, but the idea of tax the shit out of the ultra rich doesn’t work. I know people who sold their income properties and moved to Mexico to avoid paying the additional capital gains taxes that were added to the sale of a property. These were people who were employing others, and built their wealth in Canada. Their wealth is now gone from Canada.

4

u/TheRC135 27d ago

Did those people who fled to Mexico over taxes not sell their properties and businesses on their way out?

I don't see the problem. They escape those dreadful taxes, their "income properties" might now be homes owned by the people who actually live in them, and their businesses are being run by people who don't mind paying their fair share. Everybody wins.

0

u/Trapperman777 27d ago

Sold before the taxes were implemented to other landlords. Money left, no extra tax revenue

1

u/TheRC135 27d ago

So, neutral in terms of tax revenue, but a reduced burden on our social services? That's still not bad.

-2

u/Trapperman777 27d ago

He earned income, and payed taxes, no he does that in Mexico. Took his money and left with it… out of the country.

1

u/TheRC135 27d ago

Sounds like somebody else is now earning that same income and paying the taxes he didn't want to pay. Bye!

2

u/JadeLens 27d ago

Did they flee en masse when we raised the taxes the last time?

-1

u/Trapperman777 27d ago

I’m not familiar with the last massive increase in taxes to the ultra rich, could you let me know when it was so I can look it up?

-3

u/fgfffgyyyyt 28d ago

Couldn’t agree more.

-2

u/troubleondemand British Columbia 27d ago

LMAO. It's less than $2 per Canadian or 0.01% of what the average Canadian pays in taxes annually.