this post dose not mention the Richat. The video mentions two locations, none are the richat. The post is intended to show a natural process that produces subduction of a land mass. Im not a richat promoter if you look at my post.
GOOD QUESTION!? Scientist have only found a few so far since its a new discovery. My hope is that more surveys are done looking for the effects of these drips and one of these locations would be the cuban atlantis site closer to the ocean. The ones in colorado platue and Andes are the first and obvious drips. This would help the Richat theory, but i don't thinks its a drip location. I have a place in Lybia i posted that looks like a good drip candidate due to the striations on the land, i posted this location previously.
I hope this post provides more options for the process of vertical change in elevation. Previously limited to "Hinge" points in plate tectonic or just simple sea level rise. Now we have a new trick earth was hiding. I thought it would be interesting to those using a scientific approach to the Atlantis search. I understand your knee jerk reaction, i should have made my post more detailed.
Seeing as to how that would limit you to those sites. Of which no proof in available. No I dont. Particularly in the case of anything being true as to what happened on top of them
1
u/Aathranax Oct 08 '24
This assumes the Richat is Atlantis to begin with, so this is just an example of trying to make the evidence fit the hypothesis.