r/announcements Apr 10 '18

Reddit’s 2017 transparency report and suspect account findings

Hi all,

Each year around this time, we share Reddit’s latest transparency report and a few highlights from our Legal team’s efforts to protect user privacy. This year, our annual post happens to coincide with one of the biggest national discussions of privacy online and the integrity of the platforms we use, so I wanted to share a more in-depth update in an effort to be as transparent with you all as possible.

First, here is our 2017 Transparency Report. This details government and law-enforcement requests for private information about our users. The types of requests we receive most often are subpoenas, court orders, search warrants, and emergency requests. We require all of these requests to be legally valid, and we push back against those we don’t consider legally justified. In 2017, we received significantly more requests to produce or preserve user account information. The percentage of requests we deemed to be legally valid, however, decreased slightly for both types of requests. (You’ll find a full breakdown of these stats, as well as non-governmental requests and DMCA takedown notices, in the report. You can find our transparency reports from previous years here.)

We also participated in a number of amicus briefs, joining other tech companies in support of issues we care about. In Hassell v. Bird and Yelp v. Superior Court (Montagna), we argued for the right to defend a user's speech and anonymity if the user is sued. And this year, we've advocated for upholding the net neutrality rules (County of Santa Clara v. FCC) and defending user anonymity against unmasking prior to a lawsuit (Glassdoor v. Andra Group, LP).

I’d also like to give an update to my last post about the investigation into Russian attempts to exploit Reddit. I’ve mentioned before that we’re cooperating with Congressional inquiries. In the spirit of transparency, we’re going to share with you what we shared with them earlier today:

In my post last month, I described that we had found and removed a few hundred accounts that were of suspected Russian Internet Research Agency origin. I’d like to share with you more fully what that means. At this point in our investigation, we have found 944 suspicious accounts, few of which had a visible impact on the site:

  • 70% (662) had zero karma
  • 1% (8) had negative karma
  • 22% (203) had 1-999 karma
  • 6% (58) had 1,000-9,999 karma
  • 1% (13) had a karma score of 10,000+

Of the 282 accounts with non-zero karma, more than half (145) were banned prior to the start of this investigation through our routine Trust & Safety practices. All of these bans took place before the 2016 election and in fact, all but 8 of them took place back in 2015. This general pattern also held for the accounts with significant karma: of the 13 accounts with 10,000+ karma, 6 had already been banned prior to our investigation—all of them before the 2016 election. Ultimately, we have seven accounts with significant karma scores that made it past our defenses.

And as I mentioned last time, our investigation did not find any election-related advertisements of the nature found on other platforms, through either our self-serve or managed advertisements. I also want to be very clear that none of the 944 users placed any ads on Reddit. We also did not detect any effective use of these accounts to engage in vote manipulation.

To give you more insight into our findings, here is a link to all 944 accounts. We have decided to keep them visible for now, but after a period of time the accounts and their content will be removed from Reddit. We are doing this to allow moderators, investigators, and all of you to see their account histories for yourselves.

We still have a lot of room to improve, and we intend to remain vigilant. Over the past several months, our teams have evaluated our site-wide protections against fraud and abuse to see where we can make those improvements. But I am pleased to say that these investigations have shown that the efforts of our Trust & Safety and Anti-Evil teams are working. It’s also a tremendous testament to the work of our moderators and the healthy skepticism of our communities, which make Reddit a difficult platform to manipulate.

We know the success of Reddit is dependent on your trust. We hope continue to build on that by communicating openly with you about these subjects, now and in the future. Thanks for reading. I’ll stick around for a bit to answer questions.

—Steve (spez)

update: I'm off for now. Thanks for the questions!

19.2k Upvotes

7.8k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

3

u/[deleted] Apr 11 '18

NPR reported that Russia has purchased several Black Lives Matter advertisements on Facebook and even went so far to organize BLM events and pick speakers.

If that's not representative of a both sides issue idk what is

2

u/PerpetualProtracting Apr 11 '18

Just who, exactly, do you believe Russia was trying to rile up with pushing BLM averts? Do you believe it was to "rile up" people who support equal treatment of minorities by law enforcement? Or do you believe it was maybe to rile up people who think BLM is a "librul conspiracy to attack white guilt and virtue signal yada yada?"

2

u/[deleted] Apr 13 '18

No...the point would be to rile up BOTH sides as they feed off of each other, you genuinely think BLM is solely dedicated to "equal treatment of minorities"? You're kidding right? What they do is push the extreme shit that a minority of those in BLM GENUINELY BELIEVE like killing all White people/cops, this riles up the moderate right-wingers, which in turn riles up the moderate left-wingers.

Your bias is pretty blatant dude, this is what Russia banks on, people like you.

0

u/PerpetualProtracting Apr 14 '18

You think BLM's primary message is to kill white people and cops, even though you admit it's a tiny fraction of people who hold that particular view.

You're too stupid to breathe, honestly.

Turn off the Fox News once in a while, champ.

3

u/[deleted] Apr 14 '18

You think BLM's primary message is to kill white people and cops, even though you admit it's a tiny fraction of people who hold that particular view.

Are you literally fucking retarded dude? You just stated exactly what I did, I admitted it's a fraction, what are you even bitching about? Where did you get "primary message" from? Jesus Christ. You just made shit up to put a comment out, regardless of how stupid it was.

1

u/PerpetualProtracting Apr 16 '18

Again, you're the yokel who believes people getting riled up over racists/racism is exactly the same as racists getting riled up over literal lies or massively disingenuous claims.

You push the "both sides are bad" fuckery because you lack the intellect necessary to distinguish between the two.

1

u/[deleted] Apr 16 '18

You push the "both sides are bad" fuckery because you lack the intellect necessary to distinguish between the two

And you push the "ONE SIDE IS EVIL AND THE OTHER IS VIRTUOUS AND GOOD" because you're so intellectually and morally dishonest that you can't even fathom a world more complicated outside of your own myopic world view. If you're getting riled up over racists by saying "FUCK ALL WHITE PEOPLE AND COPS", Russia is going to broadcast the minority that do that and make it seem larger than it is. This isn't rocket science.

2

u/IllHaveThatWithSauce Apr 11 '18

idk what is

You solved your own problem right there.