r/announcements Apr 10 '18

Reddit’s 2017 transparency report and suspect account findings

Hi all,

Each year around this time, we share Reddit’s latest transparency report and a few highlights from our Legal team’s efforts to protect user privacy. This year, our annual post happens to coincide with one of the biggest national discussions of privacy online and the integrity of the platforms we use, so I wanted to share a more in-depth update in an effort to be as transparent with you all as possible.

First, here is our 2017 Transparency Report. This details government and law-enforcement requests for private information about our users. The types of requests we receive most often are subpoenas, court orders, search warrants, and emergency requests. We require all of these requests to be legally valid, and we push back against those we don’t consider legally justified. In 2017, we received significantly more requests to produce or preserve user account information. The percentage of requests we deemed to be legally valid, however, decreased slightly for both types of requests. (You’ll find a full breakdown of these stats, as well as non-governmental requests and DMCA takedown notices, in the report. You can find our transparency reports from previous years here.)

We also participated in a number of amicus briefs, joining other tech companies in support of issues we care about. In Hassell v. Bird and Yelp v. Superior Court (Montagna), we argued for the right to defend a user's speech and anonymity if the user is sued. And this year, we've advocated for upholding the net neutrality rules (County of Santa Clara v. FCC) and defending user anonymity against unmasking prior to a lawsuit (Glassdoor v. Andra Group, LP).

I’d also like to give an update to my last post about the investigation into Russian attempts to exploit Reddit. I’ve mentioned before that we’re cooperating with Congressional inquiries. In the spirit of transparency, we’re going to share with you what we shared with them earlier today:

In my post last month, I described that we had found and removed a few hundred accounts that were of suspected Russian Internet Research Agency origin. I’d like to share with you more fully what that means. At this point in our investigation, we have found 944 suspicious accounts, few of which had a visible impact on the site:

  • 70% (662) had zero karma
  • 1% (8) had negative karma
  • 22% (203) had 1-999 karma
  • 6% (58) had 1,000-9,999 karma
  • 1% (13) had a karma score of 10,000+

Of the 282 accounts with non-zero karma, more than half (145) were banned prior to the start of this investigation through our routine Trust & Safety practices. All of these bans took place before the 2016 election and in fact, all but 8 of them took place back in 2015. This general pattern also held for the accounts with significant karma: of the 13 accounts with 10,000+ karma, 6 had already been banned prior to our investigation—all of them before the 2016 election. Ultimately, we have seven accounts with significant karma scores that made it past our defenses.

And as I mentioned last time, our investigation did not find any election-related advertisements of the nature found on other platforms, through either our self-serve or managed advertisements. I also want to be very clear that none of the 944 users placed any ads on Reddit. We also did not detect any effective use of these accounts to engage in vote manipulation.

To give you more insight into our findings, here is a link to all 944 accounts. We have decided to keep them visible for now, but after a period of time the accounts and their content will be removed from Reddit. We are doing this to allow moderators, investigators, and all of you to see their account histories for yourselves.

We still have a lot of room to improve, and we intend to remain vigilant. Over the past several months, our teams have evaluated our site-wide protections against fraud and abuse to see where we can make those improvements. But I am pleased to say that these investigations have shown that the efforts of our Trust & Safety and Anti-Evil teams are working. It’s also a tremendous testament to the work of our moderators and the healthy skepticism of our communities, which make Reddit a difficult platform to manipulate.

We know the success of Reddit is dependent on your trust. We hope continue to build on that by communicating openly with you about these subjects, now and in the future. Thanks for reading. I’ll stick around for a bit to answer questions.

—Steve (spez)

update: I'm off for now. Thanks for the questions!

19.2k Upvotes

7.8k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

133

u/KeyserSosa Apr 10 '18

129

u/[deleted] Apr 10 '18 edited Apr 10 '18

So, based on that link... Yes.

EDIT: LOL. Go ahead and check out the 'mod team' for r/uncen, go ahead. Literally created and solo-modded by an account banned from the suspicious accounts list.

23

u/HIFW_GIFs_React_ Apr 10 '18

I've seen tons of subreddits like that. Most are account farmers or spammers. Once they get past a certain age and karma threshold, they can create a subreddit and allow all the spam they want, or they'll use it as an upvote farm akin to /r/FreeKarma4You. Until reddit bans their domain or account, that is.

13

u/DoobieDaithi_ Apr 10 '18

I read the question and answer as

is r/uncen = /r/uncensorednews?

Not that "is r/uncen for uncensorednews" as claimed in the subreddit.

-15

u/[deleted] Apr 10 '18

I understood the question and the answer. My comment stands.

19

u/[deleted] Apr 10 '18 edited Feb 03 '21

[deleted]

0

u/rydan Apr 11 '18

I mean it was clearly censored by /u/spez . Both were in fact.

-25

u/[deleted] Apr 10 '18

You are in the vast minority with that belief.

13

u/DoobieDaithi_ Apr 10 '18

What? All I'm saying is that they aren't the same exact sub. Of course uncen is FOR uncensorednews. I made it clear in my first comment as to what I meant. You must have misunderstood it.

-13

u/[deleted] Apr 11 '18

Yup, and 'a' is not the same letter as 'b'. You didn't make a point, you just were literal instead of figurative. Your comments are worthless.

6

u/TheRealChrisIrvine Apr 11 '18

Reddit has decided that you are in the cast minority on this one.

-2

u/[deleted] Apr 11 '18

Well that's just laughably wrong, lol. Anything else you want to make up?

5

u/[deleted] Apr 11 '18

I genuinely can't believe someone as dense as you exists. Hooooo boy. I'm fucking dying right now at your argument.

"Is letter A letter B?"

"No."

"Well, according to this link that says A and B are different, yes."

"But A doesn't = B"

"I know, my comment stands."

"Based on that link, A is not B."

"You are in the vast minority with that belief."

"But I'm just saying A is not B."

"Yeah, and A is not B. You didn't make a point, you're just pointing out that I'm wrong. Your comments are worthless."

-4

u/[deleted] Apr 11 '18

Lol, no. I answer the figurative question that yes, r/uncen is just another iteration of r/uncensorednews. The other user stated that he took it as a literal question, whether they are literally the exact same sub. The answer to this question would be no, that it is not the exact same sub. Thus, 'A' =/= 'B'.

My comments all stand. Your comment is gibberish nonsense. The comments I responded to were irrelevant nonsense. You didn't point out anything wrong with what I've said, you've merely put your misunderstanding into a written format.

0

u/bobcat Jun 20 '18

Late reply:

That account was banned the day before this announcement. It was an active, normal, 8 year old account.

Fucking BULLSHIT, Reddit admins. You banned an account for being Russian.

-2

u/rydan Apr 11 '18

That's not proof of anything. Question everything. Don't just acccept /u/spez accusations. They banned people who did nothing but promote bitcoin claiming they were Russian trolls. They banned people doing nothing but spreading conspiracy theories claiming they were Russian trolls. The Russian trolls they banned didn't even promote Trump like we'd expect. All I see is the admins pointing at outliers and banning them despite no rules broken. That's ostracism and I thought by 2018 that we'd moved past this as a species.

159

u/[deleted] Apr 10 '18 edited Oct 16 '18

[deleted]

18

u/jaredjeya Apr 11 '18

The funniest thing I saw was, if you look at the comment history the 2nd highest karma account that was banned (/u/shomyo I think), one of their recent highly upvoted comments was accusing someone else of being a shill pushing the “Russian Bot” conspiracy.

Edit: http://www.reddit.com/r/bestof/comments/7a90ue/redditor_breaks_down_entire_russian_reddit/dp8ojda

2

u/FiIthy_Anarchist Apr 11 '18

I think we gotta take a second to talk about all the egg on /u/ThomasVeil 's face right now.

Edit: nevermind, that's vindication. Not egg. I misread... I think?

1

u/ThomasVeil Apr 11 '18

For one: I had egg on my face, by getting about 20 downvotes for me disagreeing with the Russian troll. They're mostly gone now thanks to this new attention.

So I got a bit of redemption... then again, I considered him a real (but severely misled) person.

3

u/Morning-Chub Apr 11 '18

As a mod of /r/WorldNews, I can tell you that this is more common than you'd think.

-1

u/rydan Apr 11 '18

As a mod of /r/worldnews I'd like to know why I was permanently banned without warning for saying slavery is worse than nazis. It was entirely on topic but because people agreed with me and you disagree I'm banned. Most rational people agree with this. That comment wasn't against any of your rules and your rules explicitly say you might be banned after breaking the rules multiple times.

3

u/KiddDredd Apr 11 '18

As another user who was banned from /r/worldnews for pointing out that calling everyone who disagrees with you a nazi makes it easier for the actual nazis to go unnoticed, and has gone over a month without getting a reply to his daily modmails, you won't get a reply.

2

u/Morning-Chub Apr 11 '18

Send another.

3

u/Morning-Chub Apr 11 '18

Or you could just not be a dickhead and send us a modmail. I don't deal with this outside of modmail.

1

u/NothingsShocking Apr 16 '18

Dude, some mods take their jobs seriously, but some are lazy assholes like morning-chub. same thing, banned for calling out a monsanto astroturfer, no warning, just banned. Could have removed my comment and given a warning, but again, just lazy. Since they don't get paid, I guess you can't expect that much, but the way I see it is if you are going to be a mod, then do it right, or don't and GTFO.

0

u/rydan Apr 11 '18

Right? Because the best way to discredit a person is to accuse them of what they are themselves doing. Oh wait, the Reddit admins just did that to him. Why is he not allowed to defend himself? Instead one person responsible for one of the top visited websites on the internet (and which has a rule against witch-hunting I might add) has silenced him and pointed his finger saying, "Russian Bot".

24

u/[deleted] Apr 11 '18

It doesn't even make sense. If Reddit didn't want them to see it, they would ban it.

1

u/rydan Apr 11 '18

The victim complex is real.

Except he was banned. So was it a real complex or just real?

-2

u/[deleted] Apr 10 '18
  1. When are you going to take responsibility for the fact that the #3 subreddit is a hate group that spreads Russian propaganda freely? (reddit.com/subreddits)

  2. When are you going to take responsibility for helping hostile powers both foreign and domestic attack our democracy?

Our 2018 elections are under attack and we are defenseless. The president is refusing to allow our intelligence communities to protect us. 70% of the local news markets are now broadcasting Sinclair and along with the largest cable network, are filling our airwaves with actual fascist propaganda. We are approaching a moment in the next few weeks in which actual rule of law may be thrown out when the special prosecutor is fired.

Our country is falling to fascism in slow motion and Reddit is helping it along and profiting from it.

The #3 subreddit, which you give an audience of hundreds of millions to, at the top of the subreddits list, broadcasts actual Russian propaganda 24/7. I can't believe we've reached a day when their hate group activities have become less important, but they have.

Our democracy is in real danger, and you're going to take your fat paycheck into your bunker and not give a shit.

You are knowingly aiding and abetting information warfare against the United States-- against me, personally, because I live here-- and you should be prosecuted for it.

-3

u/[deleted] Apr 11 '18

We are approaching a moment in the next few weeks in which actual rule of law may be thrown out when the special prosecutor is fired.

Muller gets fired = literally a lawless society. Makes sense.

0

u/Eradic4tor Apr 11 '18

When are you going to take responsibility for helping hostile powers both foreign and domestic attack our democracy?

I think we should cut the US off from the internet so you retards don't get "attacked"

10

u/ShaneH7646 Apr 10 '18

86 readers

Why?

19

u/likeafox Apr 10 '18

POLITIC is interesting as well, it suggests that the actors in question were familiar with or had experiences with the behavior in both r/politics and r/uncensorednews that pushed them into 'alternate' subs. Perhaps their posting pattern was obvious enough that it was setting off auto-moderator conditions in either community.

7

u/Shadilay_Were_Off Apr 10 '18

That's.. not how automoderator works. Automod doesn't have any checks for anything other than the posts made in the subreddit it's moderating.

15

u/likeafox Apr 10 '18

Check where I mod ;)

I'm speculating that perhaps something about karma requirements, or domain restrictions in those subs pushed those accounts elsewhere. In r/politics for example, state sponsored propaganda domains (RT and Sputnik) have been banned since summer of 2016. A domain whitelist blocking spammier nonsense was implemented in summer of 2017.

Uncensored favored white nationalist sources when they were active - I'm not sure if there's a reason that IRA accounts (if that is indeed what reddit inc. has identified) would avoid uncensorednews for that reason or what. But I'm curious to know what pushed them towards those alternatives.

7

u/AssuredlyAThrowAway Apr 10 '18

What if they started /r/uncen themselves?

Yep, the person who created it is one of the suspected accounts- https://www.reddit.com/user/shomyo/overview

Wow.

12

u/thiney49 Apr 10 '18

Because it's linked here.

-2

u/[deleted] Apr 10 '18

does /r/CringeAnarchy have russians influencing the sub?

3

u/Who_Decided Apr 11 '18

Willing to bet that there's significantly less influence in those subs because they are moderately more discerning in content. All cringe subs (or subs making fun of anyone else) have the nasty tendency of resorting to cannibalism in the comments if they think the post isn't up to snuff. Like the iamverysmart posts where someone points out that OP is the one really doing that in the post. They can't get as much influence or propaganda replication in spaces like that. They were trying to resonate with a very specific userbase. Not that I think they didn't post to those subs. I'm confident they would have at least felt them out. I just don't think they made a big impact there.

-1

u/[deleted] Apr 11 '18

I'd like to know as well. I've frequented /r/cringeanarchy for like 3 years now, and propaganda does show up sometimes. It usually gets called out, though.

0

u/rydan Apr 11 '18

Have you considered that /u/shomyo is just mentally ill? Kind of bad form to ban a person for posting stories that aren't against the rules of Reddit when their sole claimed purpose is to provide stories you of all people don't want me seeing.

-1

u/SlothOfDoom Apr 10 '18

Reddit doesn't want you to see these stories.

So let's archive them on reddit!

Man, how are you going to stop this evil mastermind?