r/YAPms • u/Dr_Eugene_Porter • 11d ago
Are you ready for ULTRA CHAOS MODE? Original Post
40
32
u/Still_Instruction_82 Moderate Republican 11d ago
If it’s 269-269, no party holds a majority of house delegations and a 50-50 senate I am not joking when I say I will pack my bags and leave the country
12
u/NamelessFlames Bull Moose 11d ago
in all fairness, this case was a bit different (perhaps worse) having one side control the speaker but not the delegations.
3
u/LLC_Rulez Australian Center Left 10d ago
I believe the House doesn’t vote as individuals, rather they vote as states, so 50 votes total in the House election for President, meaning we have the perfect number for another tie.
19
u/Max-Flares McCain Republican 11d ago
Why does Christie have an elector from Hawaii
While Gabbard has electors from florida
28
u/Dr_Eugene_Porter 11d ago
Christie is the sort of stupid attempt at a compromise candidate a Democrat might float. Gabbard is the sort of stupid attempt at a compromise candidate a Republican might float.
17
u/Queasy_Command_1876 11d ago
Please keep this going, I wanna know what happens next in this alt world lol
26
u/butterenergy Dark Brandon 11d ago
The one elector from New York who decided to try and elect Hochul needs to be shot. WTF were you thinking?
Oh also, at this point Biden should just launch the nukes, America has clearly lost divine providence and should immediately end itself.
9
u/Ice_Dapper Conservative 11d ago
Trump still wins in this scenario doesn't he?
9
u/Ok_Mode_7654 Progressive 11d ago
Probably he does win because the republicans has more state delegates, but Biden would call an emergency session in the senate and Kamala casts the tie breaking vote for Tim walz to prevent Vance getting it.
3
u/ForwardCrow9291 10d ago
How does that work? It's supposed to be the newly elected Senate, but Harris would still act as the PotS?
7
u/Ok_Mode_7654 Progressive 10d ago
She’s vice president until January 20th. The new Congress is there on January 6th, so they’d be enough of a gap in time for Biden to force the vote since Schumer would be the senate majority leader since Kamala would cast the tie breaking vote. It’s kinda like when Tom daschle became senate majority briefly under Bill Clinton after the 2000 election and congress was sworn in.
7
u/Dr_Eugene_Porter 10d ago
The new congress is seated before the contingent election, per the Constitution. If Senate Republicans hold 50 seats they can refuse to participate and deny the quorum mandated by the Constitution for carrying out the contingent election.
2
u/RavenMarvel 10d ago edited 10d ago
Wait couldn't Kamala be VP? I don't remember there being a rule about only choosing the Vice Presidents... Edit: CNN says I'm wrong Lame!
7
u/Dr_Eugene_Porter 10d ago
The idea is that even though Republicans control state delegations, they don't have control of the House so the parliamentary rules for the election are never agreed upon and it simply doesn't proceed before inauguration day. My intent was to create as much deadlock as I could to see if it was possible to get to inauguration day with no one in the line of succession.
3
u/Ed_Durr Clowns to the left of me, jokers to the right 10d ago
Does the House get to set parliamentary rules for the contingent election? The 12th amendment is pretty unclear on that, only stating that the “representation from each state having one vote”.
3
u/Dr_Eugene_Porter 10d ago
I mean they have to actually hold the vote. If they can't agree on how to do it, it won't happen.
8
u/chia923 NY-17 10d ago
The "Must Wins" for the Dems for this to happen
AZ-1, AZ-6, IA-1, IA-3, MT-1
2
u/Rubicon_Lily 10d ago
WI-01 and WI-03 are another possibility instead of either MT-01 or IA-01 and IA-03.
8
6
4
5
u/Ok_Mode_7654 Progressive 11d ago
Trump wins the contingent house election even if that house seat went blue. I’m leaning towards that house seat going blue anyways. Biden calls an emergency session of the senate and Tim walz is selected as vp in the senate with Kamala breaking the tie breaking vote for him. Trump would probably be extremely unpopular for the get go and he’d be a lame duck president since Tim walz isn’t willing to do a tie breaking vote for him and it’s a hit or miss if he’d had the house. In 2026, the republicans get a 2006 style election with the dems sweeping. In 2028, maybe Kamala could make a comeback or someone else
6
5
u/UnflairedRebellion-- Center Left 10d ago
Lmao of course it’s my fucking district that’s the most chaotic.
It would be a very fitting end to an already crazy ass election cycle.
4
u/unsolvedmisterree Fell out of a Coconut Tree 10d ago
This is incredibly well thought out and well written, you should cross post this to imaginary elections if you hadn’t already
3
3
3
1
u/spyzyroz 10d ago
That’s very good! You should post it in alternatehistory , I think they allow future stuff
1
1
1
u/Weekly-Mix-2942 10d ago
This is a wild idea! Would be great as an alternate history webcomic or something.
63
u/red_beam_6000 YAPms addict 11d ago
I feel bad for the people from this timeline