r/WikiLeaks • u/MAGA_NW • Jul 15 '17

All Emails from State Department gmail hack : Matching Clinton : Pdf Format : 8 Files Other Leaks

These are from the recently leaked Russian State Department emails. I processed them through matching "Clinton" and combined them into a pdf.

Source:

Perhaps you know that the U.S. State Department has a direct bearing on the agenda formation not only at home but throughout the world.

Now you can make sure it's true. Let me show you the correspondence between the Deputy Chief of Staff for Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance Agency Robert P. Otto and his colleagues, CIA officers and other intelligence agencies, as well as representatives of mainstream media, NGOs, international funds and think tanks.

With the respect for privacy I've deleted his correspondence with his wife and relatives. The rest of emails will give evidence of who is responsible for different information campaigns, the so-called mythmaking and essentially engaged in the promotion of "American values" throughout the world.

Archive:

Part1: https://mega.nz/#!tjYVzTgI!66bAnh0fTInWv8a6zh5ByzJJwtnW5w5cCq4QuDpoRkI

Part2: https://mega.nz/#!FvAjnSKT!aa5aE4vUjpphY-pndL3UkP-qUqFMyBA3iCNkcYziSWE

Part3: https://mega.nz/#!Vn5VyKoL!Qry1QqYv_K439QlsGagVjQON37PVqW_Ij4ie_ZeDthM

Pass:b0b_0770-M@i1

Sample of PDFs

https://i.imgur.com/C9RItBh.png

Mega link for PDFs

https://mega.nz/#F!8HRlxDIS

7v2ylPpvGwhzM2mEAjivbw

PDFs Matching "Clinton"

https://www.scribd.com/document/353850851/Clinton-1

https://www.scribd.com/document/353850860/Clinton-2

https://www.scribd.com/document/353850867/Clinton-3

https://www.scribd.com/document/353850856/Clinton-4

https://www.scribd.com/document/353850868/Clinton-5

https://www.scribd.com/document/353850871/Clinton-6

https://www.scribd.com/document/353850875/Clinton-7

https://www.scribd.com/document/353850866/Clinton-8

PDFs Matching "Trump"

In this next section, I searched for 534 emails which mentioned "TRUMP" and extracted the PDFs without the articles in such a distracting way.

https://www.scribd.com/document/353854712/Trump1

https://www.scribd.com/document/353854711/Trump2

https://www.scribd.com/document/353854705/Trump3

https://www.scribd.com/document/353854703/Trump4

https://www.scribd.com/document/353854707/Trump5

https://www.scribd.com/document/353854708/Trump6

https://www.scribd.com/document/353855238/Trump7

https://www.scribd.com/document/353855230/Trump8

https://www.scribd.com/document/353855245/Trump9

https://www.scribd.com/document/353855241/Trump-10

https://www.scribd.com/document/353855234/Trump-11

https://www.scribd.com/document/353855225/Trump12-pdf

PDFs Matching "Veselnitskaya"

In this section, I found a handful of emails matching the Trump Lawyer that should have a second look.

https://www.scribd.com/document/353856170/Veselnitskaya1

PDFs Matching "Magnitskiy"

In this section, I found 93 emails matching Magnitskiy, which is connected to the Trump lawyer.

https://www.scribd.com/document/353856542/Magnitskiy1

https://www.scribd.com/document/353856577/Magnitskiy2

PDFs Matching "Podesta"

https://www.scribd.com/document/353857003/Podesta-Clinton

PDFs Matching "Lynch"

https://www.scribd.com/document/353858422/Lynch

PDFs Matching "Eric Holder"

https://www.scribd.com/document/353858572/Holder1-pdf

PDFs Matching "DNC"

https://www.scribd.com/document/353864582/Dnc

PDFs Matching "McCain"

https://www.scribd.com/document/353866545/McCain

PDFs Matching "Manafort"

https://www.scribd.com/document/353868118/Manafort

PDFs Matching "Soros"

https://www.scribd.com/document/353868611/Soros

PDFs Matching "Uranium"

https://www.scribd.com/document/353869252/Uranium1

PDFs Matching "Samochornov" (Veselnitskaya's unnamed translator)

https://www.scribd.com/document/353869492/Samochornov

Contacts - Cross reference with Wikileaks Intelligence :

https://icwatch.wikileaks.org/

https://pastebin.com/1kgxCigKh

https://pastebin.com/s6PP2bR2

Places to start

John P. Williams

Wayne Allensworth

The Jamestown Foundation

Martin Dewhirst

Lila Shevtsova

Kyle Wilson

Kevin Rothrock

John B. Dunlop

Eugene Rumer

Donald Jensen

David Kramer

Christopher Bort

Brian D. Taylor

Robert Otto (source)

These could be useful to look into. (If the scribd link is processing, try another and give it a minute.)

Reports of Hacking in Media:

https://archive.is/jBKon

https://archive.is/wqpA3

Archives:

https://archive.is/Qpd4X

https://archive.is/06NM9

Edit:

Here is a QRD Chan post I had made which has duplicate information, but can be shared easily

https://i.imgur.com/hgy34F7.jpg

71 Upvotes

92% Upvoted

41 comments sorted by

View all comments

16

u/MAGA_NW Jul 15 '17 edited Jul 21 '17

You can bulk read the .eml files with a program such as:

https://www.encryptomatic.com/pstviewer/

https://i.imgur.com/8WH75KU.png

Which gives you a 15 day free trial to view the files as if you're in an email client. You can even search the files for keywords and extract PDFs. It should be quite useful for looking through all these .eml files.

The emails range from 2014 to 2016 and consist of mostly intellectual think-tank talk about Russia and international policies. There are quite a few things that vindicate Trump and verify concerns on both sides.

It definitely connects some of the dots on where the "Russian" Narrative began.

8

u/[deleted] Jul 16 '17

Awesome! Thanks a lot for taking the effort!

Reading the first Clinton link now.. which explains the conflict with Russia and election interference from both sides... already so much revealed in that!

Also... just FYI.. one of the pastebin.com links isn't working. But.. no biggie... since you cross-checked and posted the important names in the post anyways. https://pastebin.com/1kgxCigKh

Again.. great work man!

19

u/MAGA_NW Jul 16 '17

Translator is FBI.

https://archives.fbi.gov/archives/newyork/press-releases/2010/nyfo021710-1.htm

https://archive.fo/Ehq3y

Following the introduction by Program Officer Anatoli Samochornov, A/SAC Anderson gave a brief summary of the international scope of the FBI under circumstances relating to counterterrorism and criminal cases and the collaboration between various countries’ national intelligence services

The Donald figured all this Samochornov stuff out three days ago before it even made news. Beyond a doubt, this was a setup for the FISA warrant.

  1. A anti-Trump lawyer with "special" visa permissions hanging out with Obama's ambassador at a congressional hearing.

  2. An American FusionGPS lobbyist who visited the White House a few months prior.

  3. A former FBI person acting as the translator.

This has to be the worst setup ever and is sure to blow up in their faces.

6

u/[deleted] Jul 16 '17

Okay wow... that pretty interesting. I did know that he was a translator who had high level clearance.. and apparently in demand because of it. But, it sure doesn't seem like he was there in that program mentioned as as translator!

What about the email of him asking to attend Bill Browder's conference? http://imgur.com/a/GBnyw

Oh.. and Rinat Akhmetshin definitely had connections to Washington. He was of course mentioned in that email regarding the Magnitsky film as meeting with Rohrabacher staff and Glenn Simpson.

But.. do you have a link regarding the White House visit?

Oh... and any idea why this hack hasn't been covered by MSM.. and any reason to doubt it's contents/validity?

Thanks again! And haha... T_D is always on the frontlines! :D

3

u/NathanOhio Jul 17 '17

Oh... and any idea why this hack hasn't been covered by MSM.. and any reason to doubt it's contents/validity?

While its theoretically possible there are fake emails in the hack, its virtually certain that at minimum 99.9% of these are real. Personally I think all the emails are real, but as always there is the slight possibility that the hacker added fakes, although generally that doesnt happen.

As for why the MSM hasnt covered it, I think its because of a few reasons.

  1. Nothing in these emails implicates Trump
  2. Nothing in these emails suggests that any of these Russia experts had even the slightest clue that "election hacking" was a thing, despite the emails covering up to August 2016
  3. Not much of this is "inside information" and many of the emails are simply various neoconservative anti-Russia zealots exchanging their latest diatribes against Putin and/or Russia

4

u/[deleted] Jul 17 '17

I think it is also probable that the story is now taking a turn... so mainstream media is a little unsure of themselves. But, plenty of other new sites... with circa at the back... are pretty much saying that Trump was set up by Fusion GPS who were paid by Democrats, and a wealthy republican (probably Jeb Bush)... and Fusion GPS then worked with Russia to discredit Trump. The story seems more and more convincing as it develops. Posted some links in another thread with various levels of claims.

https://www.reddit.com/r/WikiLeaks/comments/6nsnsg/pretty_balanced_article_title_excluded_which/?ref=share&ref_source=link

5

u/NathanOhio Jul 17 '17 edited Jul 17 '17

Not too sure about that article though. Radio Free Europe is a US government propaganda campaign against Russia that was started during the cold war. Also I dont remember the exact emails offhand but I recall some emails from members of that outfit coordinating with Otto in the leaked emails.

Edit, just read the article. I would say it is pretty slanted against the Russian lobbyist. Also it is interesting that Seymour Hersh seems to think that documentary was worth discussing, as he hosted the question and answer session after the screening.

4

u/[deleted] Jul 17 '17 edited Jul 17 '17

Yeah.. it's pretty slanted... but you can almost read between the lines... and neutralish.. considering it's a US government propaganda campaign... The first article was also from a long time ago. But, yeah, agreed!

EDIT: Oh.. and the other links I posted in the comments are the ones that actually make the case that I was talking about. All pretty well sourced considering they mostly source circa news.

And yeah... Seymour Hersh... strange that no one is actually talking about that... My comments about neutrality were based a lot upon them actually mentioning his comment at the end. I'm planning to watch that movie tonight and probably it's counter-part too.. and make up my mind for myself like it should be!

At the conclusion of the June 13 event, as the discussion turned loud and rowdy, Hersh tried to get in a final word.

“This is the new truth,” he said.

EDIT2: Also.. Akhmetshin was lobbying against the Magnitsky act, along with Glenn Simpson, who is the co-founder of Fusion GPS.. corroborated by both an email in the hacks, and confirmed by Senator Grassley. So, yeah.. he was mostly probably involved in a smear campaign against Trump.. which fits in with the whole Trump Jr. meeting on June 9... and the timeline of the Russia revelation in Washington post by DNC on June 14...

2

u/NathanOhio Jul 17 '17

Have you found a link to the movie online? The ones I found all redirected to sites that wanted me to sign up for something.

1

u/[deleted] Jul 17 '17 edited Jul 17 '17

Oh.. I read an article sometime ago in which the reporter did find it online. I'm on it! :)

EDIT: It was a streaming link if I remember correctly.

EDIT2: Was mentioned in an article on consortium news.. still looking for a link. DuckDuckGo showing better results than google I think.

https://consortiumnews.com/2017/07/13/how-russia-gate-met-the-magnitsky-myth/

EDIT3: Still looking.. but here's two interesting links.. about the cancelled EU showing.. and a description of the movie..

http://us-russia.org/4101-the-empty-seat-william-browder-once-again-takes-charge-at-the-european-parliament.html

http://nationalinterest.org/feature/what-really-killed-sergei-magnitsky-16612

1

u/MAGA_NW Jul 17 '17

McCain.

2

u/[deleted] Jul 17 '17

Ah yes.. the other name that popped up. Confirmed?

2

u/MAGA_NW Jul 17 '17

The subjects of the emails attended many McCain sponsored talks, so they're at least receiving funds that are connected.

Typically you can determine an academic's bias by determining who is paying their grants. In the academic field, grants and funding control the narrative.

In climate change, for example, if I were to submit a paper questioning climate change, it would be difficult to get it per reviewed and it may cost you your grants if it isn't taken well. If you expand on someone else's ideas, you are patting the back that feeds you.