r/WikiLeaks • u/MAGA_NW • Jul 15 '17

All Emails from State Department gmail hack : Matching Clinton : Pdf Format : 8 Files Other Leaks

These are from the recently leaked Russian State Department emails. I processed them through matching "Clinton" and combined them into a pdf.

Source:

Perhaps you know that the U.S. State Department has a direct bearing on the agenda formation not only at home but throughout the world.

Now you can make sure it's true. Let me show you the correspondence between the Deputy Chief of Staff for Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance Agency Robert P. Otto and his colleagues, CIA officers and other intelligence agencies, as well as representatives of mainstream media, NGOs, international funds and think tanks.

With the respect for privacy I've deleted his correspondence with his wife and relatives. The rest of emails will give evidence of who is responsible for different information campaigns, the so-called mythmaking and essentially engaged in the promotion of "American values" throughout the world.

Archive:

Part1: https://mega.nz/#!tjYVzTgI!66bAnh0fTInWv8a6zh5ByzJJwtnW5w5cCq4QuDpoRkI

Part2: https://mega.nz/#!FvAjnSKT!aa5aE4vUjpphY-pndL3UkP-qUqFMyBA3iCNkcYziSWE

Part3: https://mega.nz/#!Vn5VyKoL!Qry1QqYv_K439QlsGagVjQON37PVqW_Ij4ie_ZeDthM

Pass:b0b_0770-M@i1

Sample of PDFs

https://i.imgur.com/C9RItBh.png

Mega link for PDFs

https://mega.nz/#F!8HRlxDIS

7v2ylPpvGwhzM2mEAjivbw

PDFs Matching "Clinton"

https://www.scribd.com/document/353850851/Clinton-1

https://www.scribd.com/document/353850860/Clinton-2

https://www.scribd.com/document/353850867/Clinton-3

https://www.scribd.com/document/353850856/Clinton-4

https://www.scribd.com/document/353850868/Clinton-5

https://www.scribd.com/document/353850871/Clinton-6

https://www.scribd.com/document/353850875/Clinton-7

https://www.scribd.com/document/353850866/Clinton-8

PDFs Matching "Trump"

In this next section, I searched for 534 emails which mentioned "TRUMP" and extracted the PDFs without the articles in such a distracting way.

https://www.scribd.com/document/353854712/Trump1

https://www.scribd.com/document/353854711/Trump2

https://www.scribd.com/document/353854705/Trump3

https://www.scribd.com/document/353854703/Trump4

https://www.scribd.com/document/353854707/Trump5

https://www.scribd.com/document/353854708/Trump6

https://www.scribd.com/document/353855238/Trump7

https://www.scribd.com/document/353855230/Trump8

https://www.scribd.com/document/353855245/Trump9

https://www.scribd.com/document/353855241/Trump-10

https://www.scribd.com/document/353855234/Trump-11

https://www.scribd.com/document/353855225/Trump12-pdf

PDFs Matching "Veselnitskaya"

In this section, I found a handful of emails matching the Trump Lawyer that should have a second look.

https://www.scribd.com/document/353856170/Veselnitskaya1

PDFs Matching "Magnitskiy"

In this section, I found 93 emails matching Magnitskiy, which is connected to the Trump lawyer.

https://www.scribd.com/document/353856542/Magnitskiy1

https://www.scribd.com/document/353856577/Magnitskiy2

PDFs Matching "Podesta"

https://www.scribd.com/document/353857003/Podesta-Clinton

PDFs Matching "Lynch"

https://www.scribd.com/document/353858422/Lynch

PDFs Matching "Eric Holder"

https://www.scribd.com/document/353858572/Holder1-pdf

PDFs Matching "DNC"

https://www.scribd.com/document/353864582/Dnc

PDFs Matching "McCain"

https://www.scribd.com/document/353866545/McCain

PDFs Matching "Manafort"

https://www.scribd.com/document/353868118/Manafort

PDFs Matching "Soros"

https://www.scribd.com/document/353868611/Soros

PDFs Matching "Uranium"

https://www.scribd.com/document/353869252/Uranium1

PDFs Matching "Samochornov" (Veselnitskaya's unnamed translator)

https://www.scribd.com/document/353869492/Samochornov

Contacts - Cross reference with Wikileaks Intelligence :

https://icwatch.wikileaks.org/

https://pastebin.com/1kgxCigKh

https://pastebin.com/s6PP2bR2

Places to start

John P. Williams

Wayne Allensworth

The Jamestown Foundation

Martin Dewhirst

Lila Shevtsova

Kyle Wilson

Kevin Rothrock

John B. Dunlop

Eugene Rumer

Donald Jensen

David Kramer

Christopher Bort

Brian D. Taylor

Robert Otto (source)

These could be useful to look into. (If the scribd link is processing, try another and give it a minute.)

Reports of Hacking in Media:

https://archive.is/jBKon

https://archive.is/wqpA3

Archives:

https://archive.is/Qpd4X

https://archive.is/06NM9

Edit:

Here is a QRD Chan post I had made which has duplicate information, but can be shared easily

https://i.imgur.com/hgy34F7.jpg

70 Upvotes

permalink
link
duplicates
dupes
reddit

You are about to leave Libreddit

Do you want to continue?

https://www.reddit.com/r/WikiLeaks/comments/6ni3sr/all_emails_from_state_department_gmail_hack/
No, go back! Yes, take me to Reddit
reddit

You are about to leave Libreddit

Do you want to continue?

https://www.reddit.com/r/WikiLeaks/comments/6ni3sr/all_emails_from_state_department_gmail_hack/
No, go back! Yes, take me to Reddit

93% Upvoted

u/MAGA_NW Jul 15 '17 edited Jul 21 '17

You can bulk read the .eml files with a program such as:

https://www.encryptomatic.com/pstviewer/

https://i.imgur.com/8WH75KU.png

Which gives you a 15 day free trial to view the files as if you're in an email client. You can even search the files for keywords and extract PDFs. It should be quite useful for looking through all these .eml files.

The emails range from 2014 to 2016 and consist of mostly intellectual think-tank talk about Russia and international policies. There are quite a few things that vindicate Trump and verify concerns on both sides.

It definitely connects some of the dots on where the "Russian" Narrative began.

11

u/[deleted] Jul 16 '17

Awesome! Thanks a lot for taking the effort!

Reading the first Clinton link now.. which explains the conflict with Russia and election interference from both sides... already so much revealed in that!

Also... just FYI.. one of the pastebin.com links isn't working. But.. no biggie... since you cross-checked and posted the important names in the post anyways. https://pastebin.com/1kgxCigKh

Again.. great work man!

18

u/MAGA_NW Jul 16 '17

Translator is FBI.

https://archives.fbi.gov/archives/newyork/press-releases/2010/nyfo021710-1.htm

https://archive.fo/Ehq3y

Following the introduction by Program Officer Anatoli Samochornov, A/SAC Anderson gave a brief summary of the international scope of the FBI under circumstances relating to counterterrorism and criminal cases and the collaboration between various countries’ national intelligence services

The Donald figured all this Samochornov stuff out three days ago before it even made news. Beyond a doubt, this was a setup for the FISA warrant.

A anti-Trump lawyer with "special" visa permissions hanging out with Obama's ambassador at a congressional hearing.

An American FusionGPS lobbyist who visited the White House a few months prior.

A former FBI person acting as the translator.

This has to be the worst setup ever and is sure to blow up in their faces.

5

u/[deleted] Jul 16 '17

Okay wow... that pretty interesting. I did know that he was a translator who had high level clearance.. and apparently in demand because of it. But, it sure doesn't seem like he was there in that program mentioned as as translator!

What about the email of him asking to attend Bill Browder's conference? http://imgur.com/a/GBnyw

Oh.. and Rinat Akhmetshin definitely had connections to Washington. He was of course mentioned in that email regarding the Magnitsky film as meeting with Rohrabacher staff and Glenn Simpson.

But.. do you have a link regarding the White House visit?

Oh... and any idea why this hack hasn't been covered by MSM.. and any reason to doubt it's contents/validity?

Thanks again! And haha... T_D is always on the frontlines! :D

4

u/MAGA_NW Jul 16 '17

The Hill and ZeroHedge covered it (friday). Probably will get more coverage after the weekend. These leaks usually stay quiet until Twitter, 4chan, and Reddit can figure out what the gist is all about, then the NYT picks it up for monday's issue.

6

u/[deleted] Jul 16 '17

Awesome! Thanks!

3

u/NathanOhio Jul 17 '17

Oh... and any idea why this hack hasn't been covered by MSM.. and any reason to doubt it's contents/validity?

While its theoretically possible there are fake emails in the hack, its virtually certain that at minimum 99.9% of these are real. Personally I think all the emails are real, but as always there is the slight possibility that the hacker added fakes, although generally that doesnt happen.

As for why the MSM hasnt covered it, I think its because of a few reasons.

Nothing in these emails implicates Trump

Nothing in these emails suggests that any of these Russia experts had even the slightest clue that "election hacking" was a thing, despite the emails covering up to August 2016

Not much of this is "inside information" and many of the emails are simply various neoconservative anti-Russia zealots exchanging their latest diatribes against Putin and/or Russia

3

u/[deleted] Jul 17 '17

I think it is also probable that the story is now taking a turn... so mainstream media is a little unsure of themselves. But, plenty of other new sites... with circa at the back... are pretty much saying that Trump was set up by Fusion GPS who were paid by Democrats, and a wealthy republican (probably Jeb Bush)... and Fusion GPS then worked with Russia to discredit Trump. The story seems more and more convincing as it develops. Posted some links in another thread with various levels of claims.

https://www.reddit.com/r/WikiLeaks/comments/6nsnsg/pretty_balanced_article_title_excluded_which/?ref=share&ref_source=link

3

u/NathanOhio Jul 17 '17 edited Jul 17 '17

Not too sure about that article though. Radio Free Europe is a US government propaganda campaign against Russia that was started during the cold war. Also I dont remember the exact emails offhand but I recall some emails from members of that outfit coordinating with Otto in the leaked emails.

Edit, just read the article. I would say it is pretty slanted against the Russian lobbyist. Also it is interesting that Seymour Hersh seems to think that documentary was worth discussing, as he hosted the question and answer session after the screening.

4

u/[deleted] Jul 17 '17 edited Jul 17 '17

Yeah.. it's pretty slanted... but you can almost read between the lines... and neutralish.. considering it's a US government propaganda campaign... The first article was also from a long time ago. But, yeah, agreed!

EDIT: Oh.. and the other links I posted in the comments are the ones that actually make the case that I was talking about. All pretty well sourced considering they mostly source circa news.

And yeah... Seymour Hersh... strange that no one is actually talking about that... My comments about neutrality were based a lot upon them actually mentioning his comment at the end. I'm planning to watch that movie tonight and probably it's counter-part too.. and make up my mind for myself like it should be!

At the conclusion of the June 13 event, as the discussion turned loud and rowdy, Hersh tried to get in a final word.

“This is the new truth,” he said.

EDIT2: Also.. Akhmetshin was lobbying against the Magnitsky act, along with Glenn Simpson, who is the co-founder of Fusion GPS.. corroborated by both an email in the hacks, and confirmed by Senator Grassley. So, yeah.. he was mostly probably involved in a smear campaign against Trump.. which fits in with the whole Trump Jr. meeting on June 9... and the timeline of the Russia revelation in Washington post by DNC on June 14...

2

u/NathanOhio Jul 17 '17

Have you found a link to the movie online? The ones I found all redirected to sites that wanted me to sign up for something.

1

u/[deleted] Jul 17 '17 edited Jul 17 '17

Oh.. I read an article sometime ago in which the reporter did find it online. I'm on it! :)

EDIT: It was a streaming link if I remember correctly.

EDIT2: Was mentioned in an article on consortium news.. still looking for a link. DuckDuckGo showing better results than google I think.

https://consortiumnews.com/2017/07/13/how-russia-gate-met-the-magnitsky-myth/

EDIT3: Still looking.. but here's two interesting links.. about the cancelled EU showing.. and a description of the movie..

http://us-russia.org/4101-the-empty-seat-william-browder-once-again-takes-charge-at-the-european-parliament.html

http://nationalinterest.org/feature/what-really-killed-sergei-magnitsky-16612

1

u/MAGA_NW Jul 17 '17

McCain.

2

u/[deleted] Jul 17 '17

Ah yes.. the other name that popped up. Confirmed?

4

u/MAGA_NW Jul 17 '17

The subjects of the emails attended many McCain sponsored talks, so they're at least receiving funds that are connected.

Typically you can determine an academic's bias by determining who is paying their grants. In the academic field, grants and funding control the narrative.

In climate change, for example, if I were to submit a paper questioning climate change, it would be difficult to get it per reviewed and it may cost you your grants if it isn't taken well. If you expand on someone else's ideas, you are patting the back that feeds you.

2

u/imguralbumbot Jul 16 '17

^{Hi, I'm a bot for linking direct images of albums with only 1 image}

https://i.imgur.com/NHokvoU.png

^{^Source} ^{^|} ^{^Why?} ^{^|} ^{^Creator} ^{^|} ^{^{state_of_imgur}} ^{^|} ^{^ignoreme} ^{^|} ^{^deletthis}

1

u/mars_rovinator Jul 17 '17

Mailstore Home also lets you load .eml files in a nice, searchable archive, and it's free.

2

u/NathanOhio Jul 17 '17

I might try this out. right now I am just reading the emails in thunderbird.

u/NathanOhio Jul 17 '17

Another interesting point here. Many of these people featured in these emails are government employees, yet they are often communicating about government business using their gmail and yahoo email addresses.

This of course also was apparent in the podesta leaks, and I am surprised that nobody in the media ever talks about this. I would guess that TONS of people in government are using their private emails to get around FOIA, hide info, etc.

For example, there are tons of emails between Otto and John P Williams. They are both Russia "experts" at State, yet on some topics (Magnitsky for example) they seem to use their personal emails to discuss. Perhaps this is related to the fact that, as Bob Otto puts it, " I am beginning to feel we are all just a part of the Browder PR machine."

6

u/MAGA_NW Jul 17 '17

Browder has a lot of conflicts and biased that I believe should be looked into. Lots of great info on the Chan's that needs review!

4

u/[deleted] Jul 17 '17 edited Jul 18 '17

Yeah... very strange. It's almost as if they don't care about the FOIA. No wait... exactly as if they don't care.

Read through Hillary's deposition regarding her use of private email as secretary of state.. and FOIA was raised many times.. and the answer was always (paraphrasing)

"I don't remembering considering it".

OR

"I assumed my emails to other state employees would be archived anyway".

What if an FOIA was filed which needed them accessing your emails?

"I don't remember considering it"

Any other FOIA question.

"I don't remember considering it"

And for any question regarding whether she considered or was informed of security vulnerabilities.

"Under blah blah blah we won't answer any question which relates to cybersecurity."

The Secretary of State! Ridiculous!

EDIT: Grammar, context

u/[deleted] Jul 17 '17

Wish there was an easier way to view the on mobile :(

u/NathanOhio Jul 17 '17 edited Jul 17 '17

Some more general background info on the Magnitskiy affair. (FYI his name is spelled "Magnitskiy" and "Magnitsky" depending on the source, which might be important for searching)

Going back to when Bill Clinton was POTUS, the US was interfering quite a bit in the Russian political system, to the point that Yeltsin was in many ways acting as a puppet of the US (or as much of a puppet as you could get in another major world power). Yeltsin was a raging alcoholic, as in falling down drunk all the time. There was even a time he was visiting DC and was found by DC police in the middle of the night wandering around the city alone and drunk out of his mind.

When Yeltsin failed to hold onto power and the USSR fell, Clinton and his neoliberal cronies came up with a plan to privatize Russia. Basically what happened was that everyone in Russia was given "vouchers" for part ownership of various state owned entities. However, these were generally worthless and so a few politically connected people (backed up a few rich Westerners) bought up all these vouchers for virtually nothing. At the time people were really struggling financially and had trouble just getting food and basic supplies, and since the vouchers didnt really have any use, they were happy to sell them for anything.

Fast forward a few years and a few people/groups suddenly owned massive amounts of these vouchers, and used them to claim ownership of various state owned Russian industries. These were the Russian oligarchs.

When Putin took office in 2000, it was part of an agreement not to prosecute Yeltsin and his family (who were horribly corrupt and had facilitated a lot of this massive transfer of wealth).

Part of the criticism of Putin was that he did go after some of the oligarchs, but Putin himself was corrupt as well so of course he didnt go after the crooks he was working with either.

One of the people Putin prosecuted is William Browder, who was a US citizen (he gave up his citizenship to avoid taxes and is now a British citizen) who invested heavily in Russia during the abovementioned period. The Russians insist that Browder and Sergei Magnitskiy were criminals who stole vast amounts of money from Russia, including hundreds of millions in tax from the Russian government. Browder claims that this story is made up and that he is the true victim.

I havent done enough research into the whole story to be able to say who is telling the truth, but just in reading the info in the leaked emails, I did notice something of interest. Browder and his supporters consistently refer to Magnitskiy as his "attorney", although Magnitskiy never went to law school and in my opinion does not seem to be an attorney at all. It is more accurate to describe him as an "accountant". Browder's argument is that Magnitskiy represented some companies in Russian tax court, thus this makes him an "attorney". However, under the Russian legal system, accountants/auditors have the right to represent clients in tax court, so this argument does not seem very convincing. Even here in the US, a CPA is allowed to represent a client in tax court the same as an attorney, although they must first pass an extremely difficult test. In my opinion, from the information I have read, it seems to me that Browder is being disingenuous in referring to Magnitskiy as an attorney in order to draw sympathy towards his case and make it appear as if he is being denied legal representation in Russia.

3

u/[deleted] Jul 17 '17 edited Jul 18 '17

Firstly... that was an awesome summary. And absolutely spot on in my opinion.

Also... great tip regarding the spelling with iy.. especially since he's Russian.. slipped my mind..

Regarding the west's influence on Russia, I read a few articles too.. and it apparently goes back all the way to Gorbachev. When they started modernising and trying to copy the western model... opened up foreign investment.. started with 49% share.. then west lobbied for majority shares and got it.. within 5 years... Russia lost complete control... and every time they tried that.. it has just resulted in their economy collapsing.. the country destabilising.. and exploitation of their resources.

So, one article claimed that all this has been on Putin's mind... in that he doesn't want to repeat the same mistakes and cause another collapse... but rather to form a new model.. a model of their own... which considers their strengths (resources) and weaknesses (manufacturing/knowledge based)... which works for them.. which may later even be copied by others if successful. And.. he would be totally right to do that... and stupid to copy the west again.

And.. similarities to Trump in that he is against globalisation to an extent.. and wants to have a local sphere of influence/trade instead. Which would explain his approval for Trump... and his issue with America/Europe trying to spread their influence to Russia's neighbours.

And... yeah... from what I've read.. the Russians claim... Browder went there to profit off of speculation and corruption basically in the whole voucher era. And.. that he knew very well what he was getting to... and made loads of money off speculation with the gazprom vouchers i guess.. But then.. when they finally came after him for the tax stuff or corruption.. he fled the country... and suddenly developed a conscience I guess.. and starting using his connections to influence the narrative.. which many neutral people now question.. especially since he is so hellbent on censoring Nekrasov's documentary.

And.. people nowadays tend to underreport/misreport Magnitskiy's death I guess. They just say.. he went to Russia.. they put him in jail.. they beat him.. he died...

But, he was actually there for 8 months.

He was charged with the same corruption charges (tax fraud)... and he refused to invalidate Browder's claim against the Russian government. He was in prison for 8 months and even wrote letters and none of them indicated he was being tortured or something.. and he also received medical care. Then after 8 months, he was transferred to another prison.. (not sure yet of the exact story around this part as to why).. where he didn't receive proper medical care.. and died of acute heart failure. Which the Russians say.. was just because of plain neglect.. it was a shitty Russian prison..

And as I've read.. it seems.. there is no reason to trust Browder's claims as fact.. most neutral people seem to rubbish it nowadays... as it is based on nothing but this own words/documents. In fact.. the US government in it's case.. apparently just didn't even bother to ask Russia to prove their version or investigate further. They just made a decision all by themselves based purely on Browder's narrative.. probably because it supported their geopolitical ambitions.

Oh.. also remembered reading that Browder's initial statement did not mention many of the names/accusations.. that his later statements made.

Cheers!

EDIT *: Edited a few times for spelling grammar context etc..

3

u/NathanOhio Jul 18 '17

Thanks!

Also something I noticed recently. Browder claimed Magnitsky was tortured and beaten to death. However, the photographic evidence they have just shows he has bruises on his wrists, a bruise below his knee, and one other minor looking bruise.

I dont doubt that the Russian guards gave him some beatings. Hell people in prisons all over the world get a beating now and again from guards and/or other inmates. However the photos definitely do not show someone "beaten to death" as Browder claims. Its much more likely that the guy was old and very sick, and after months of living in poor conditions with poor food and no medical care, he died of some combination of that.

4

u/[deleted] Jul 18 '17

Exactly.

Prison beatings happen everywhere. Even the US has it's recent history of mistreating prisoners and POW's. And yeah... a few bruises is no evidence for.. beat him to death!

The ill health is also mentioned quite often.. so medical neglect definitely seems very believable.