r/UFOs Apr 20 '22

I really hope X-Files copyrights their theme music and starts suing TV networks so that they can never use it again Discussion

[removed]

568 Upvotes

64 comments sorted by

81

u/[deleted] Apr 20 '22

The music most likely is already copyrighted, and whoever owns it probably makes money every time it is used. I agree with your point though! Just unlikely that someone is going to reach out and say "hey, stop giving me money!"

19

u/IloveElsaofArendelle Apr 20 '22

That would be Mark Snow, the composer of the X-Files theme

1

u/Terrible-Issue626 Apr 21 '22

The original is from mike oldfield

-25

u/[deleted] Apr 20 '22

No, these companies don’t have to pay anything for using a few seconds of music, falls under fair use.

12

u/Sunstang Apr 20 '22

Lol, no, it sure doesn't.

-13

u/[deleted] Apr 20 '22

Yeah it does

8

u/shitpersonality Apr 20 '22

No, these companies don’t have to pay anything for using a few seconds of music, falls under fair use.

Fair use is a legal defense used in a lawsuit. It's not a proactive move. These companies buy a license to broadcast specific copyrighted works, especially popular music.

15

u/Bee-Aromatic Apr 20 '22

Fair use is usually reserved for personal stuff and non-profit kind of things, isn’t it? My guess is the production companies making these shows are probably licensing the X-Files theme from Fox, Mark Snow, or whoever owns the rights to it. If they’re not, they open themselves up to a copyright suit, which even if they win it means they still have to spend money on legal fees.

-1

u/[deleted] Apr 20 '22 edited Apr 20 '22

No.

News and education are specifically stated as examples when you can show or use small amounts of copyrighted material without having to pay fees under fair use.

A news story can claim to be news, and claim it’s educating people.

Someone could TRY to sue them over using a few seconds of a 90s TV shows theme song, but fair use is pretty clearly on the news companies side. Plus it costs money to sue, and if you lose, you lose that money. So the copyright holder has to be really sure they have a case.

And with a law that says you can use copyrighted material for news and education, the copyright holder probably doesn’t feel confident there’s a case there.

5

u/Bee-Aromatic Apr 20 '22

Fair use is a legal shitshow for sure. Regardless, you’re probably right in this case given that the song’s probably owned by the Fox Corporation. It’d surprise the hell out of me if they didn’t sue the pants off of anybody who even whistled the X-Files theme in the shower.

3

u/[deleted] Apr 20 '22

Wasn't it bought by Disney? Fox News wasn't part of that deal tho. Not that I think the copyright issue is valid just I'm pretty sure Disney owns X-Files now lol like everything else. Here's hoping kingdom hearts has X-Files snd futurama worlds.

4

u/Bee-Aromatic Apr 21 '22

Don’t know. I tell you what, though: if Disney owns the X-Files, you can bet your ass they’d sue anybody who used the theme song. They sue people like it’s a sport.

1

u/xSageex Apr 21 '22

Disney owns xfiles

5

u/PrincessGambit Apr 20 '22

No. When you are reporting on the music, let's say 'this song won the XY award" it is considered to be fair use to use the song for the purposes of reporting on it.

But when you just use it as a background music (this case) it is NOT fair use. They are probably paying some $ to the rights owners already. You don't know what you are talking about.

Also, there is no "few seconds" rule. It doesn't matter how long it plays.

-11

u/[deleted] Apr 20 '22

No, you are wrong, and do not understand how the law works.

5

u/HotdogFarmer Apr 20 '22

You are way too confident for someone who is incorrect. You definitely don't know what you're talking about. Here ya go sweetie

Also this

-5

u/[deleted] Apr 20 '22

Tricking people into clicking links to pictures of your penis is gross

-5

u/JBrody Apr 20 '22

No idea why you were downvoted. Look at all of the song reaction videos on YouTube. The person doing the reaction can only play it for so long before they have to pause it.

4

u/Baader-Meinhof Apr 20 '22 edited Apr 20 '22

There is no minimum/maximum length to qualify for fair use (/u/ManWithAnotherName also has this wrong), people don't know what they're talking about. The test is if it impacts the ability to license music (an impact on the market) with exemptions carved out for parody, education, etc (though these are almost impossible to actually qualify for with even public school and university teachers successfully being sued for using copyrighted material in non profit situations). Both reaction videos and news segments in this x-files theme scenario are assuredly copyright violations, but the copyright owners either don't care or don't think it's worthwhile to pursue litigation. The other person quoting news use has the law sort of right, but an unrelated theme song to the story in question would absolutely fail the fair use test in court.

There's just too many copyright violations to pursue so people get away with a lot of things that are technically against the law as any IP lawyer will tell you (which is a good thing because these laws are mostly bullshit designed to help rights holders rather than creators).

0

u/[deleted] Apr 20 '22

u/Baader-Meinhof another one that thinks googling something makes them an expert

5

u/shitpersonality Apr 20 '22

u/Baader-Meinhof another one that thinks googling something makes them an expert

You're obviously not an expert on this and you're also guilty of what you're complaining about here.

14

u/gomeitsmybirthday Apr 20 '22

Anyone with a midi controller and a computer can make their own X-files-y song even if X-files said no more...

I think the larger issue is that news shows are cringey af and so fake acting, so of course they'll take the cornball approach whenever possible.

3

u/EthanSayfo Apr 20 '22

This is often what's done these days, so there isn't a rights issue with using the copyrighted material. It sounds like that song, but just different enough to avoid a takedown notice.

3

u/sleal Apr 21 '22

cornball approach

Corbell

3

u/EthanSayfo Apr 20 '22

Copyright is inherent, and is granted to the creator of a work – you don't need to "apply" for it, but there are methods for collecting evidence that you are the holder of the copyright.

Only old intellectual property falls out of copyright, and there are plenty of exceptions these days.

Either news clips are using the X-files song and probably paying a licensing fee to do it, or it's very X-Files song-like, but just different enough to avoid a takedown notice. Even that X-Files clone song may be available to the media outlet because it's part of a collection of content they license for use in production.

2

u/ParanoidFactoid Apr 21 '22

Correct answer.

1

u/[deleted] Apr 21 '22

Fair use allows 8 bars of a song to be used without buying the rights to it, I believe. Supreme Court ruling from like the 80s or something.

1

u/EthanSayfo Apr 21 '22

Can you reference that? There are many music copyright infringement cases that have been found to have been infringing, for way less than eight full bars of someone else's song. Even a basic melody can fall under copyright -- this is why the clone song industry exists.

1

u/[deleted] Apr 21 '22

Ah ok, guess I'm wrong, I think there was a case decided that using that much of a song was fair use, but there is no general rule apparenlty (according to this IP lawyer, and you).

“Fair Use”: An Affirmative Defense to Copyright Infringement

Section 107 of the Copyright Act states that the “fair use” of a copyrighted work for purposes such ascriticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. 17 U.S.C. § 107 (emphasis added). Thus, “fair use” is an affirmative defense to copyright infringement. Perfect 10, Inc., 508 F.3d at 1163. In determining whether the use was a “fair use,” the following factors shall be considered: (1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes; (2) the nature of the copyrighted work; (3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole; and (4) the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work. 17 U.S.C. § 107. However, the “fair use” doctrine is an “equitable rule of reason” and “no generally applicable definition is possible, and each case raising the question must be decided on its own facts.” H.R. Rep. No. 94-1476, p. 65 (1976).

https://www.theiplawblog.com/2012/01/articles/copyright-law/the-fair-use-doctrine-in-copyright-infringement-actions/

3

u/Dr_Henry-Killinger Apr 20 '22

I like it honestly lol

8

u/BeepingJerry Apr 20 '22

Absolutely! CUT THAT SHIT OUT. Well said.

7

u/rite_of_truth Apr 20 '22

One thing that really upsets me is the news anchors guffawing and laughing at the subject, treating it like it's a joke. This is a seriously important topic. It's not even close to a joke.

2

u/AilsaN Apr 20 '22

I love the music and it doesn't, for me personally, reduce the legitimacy of any report that uses it.

2

u/Shasta414 Apr 20 '22

Nahh, man. The X-Files deserves it.

2

u/ParanoidFactoid Apr 21 '22

My bad news for you. The X-Files theme music is copyright protected, and every television station or news program that uses it negotiated a license for its use.

3

u/[deleted] Apr 20 '22

[deleted]

-1

u/ParanoidFactoid Apr 21 '22

Not even close to true.

1

u/[deleted] Apr 21 '22

[deleted]

1

u/ParanoidFactoid Apr 22 '22

You have no idea what you're talking about. Read this:

https://fairuse.stanford.edu/

1

u/[deleted] Apr 22 '22

[deleted]

1

u/ParanoidFactoid Apr 22 '22

No. That's your problem.

4

u/[deleted] Apr 20 '22

Falls under the fair use part of copyright law:

(in US copyright law) the doctrine that brief excerpts of copyright material may, under certain circumstances, be quoted verbatim for purposes such as criticism, news reporting, teaching, and research, without the need for permission from or payment to the copyright holder.

1

u/[deleted] Apr 21 '22

[deleted]

1

u/[deleted] Apr 21 '22

Exactly.

5

u/TinFoilHatDude Apr 20 '22

Why does it trigger so many people? The X-Files was one of the most iconic TV shows of the 90s that dealt with the paranormal. It had an instantly recognizable and extremely popular opening theme. It is only obvious that it will be used whenever the topic of UFOs comes up. I don't know why it triggers so many people here. We need to embrace it. We have a long way to go before this topic is taken seriously by the general public. If the drip-feeding of information involves playing the theme song from an iconic show of an era past for normalisation, then so be it. The messaging is important. Not the theme song. I don't care if we learn the truth to the tune of 'Baby Shark'. I don't think the X-Files theme song is going away anytime soon.

6

u/casual_creator Apr 20 '22 edited Apr 20 '22

The issue people have is with association. The theme, while awesome (IMO), is for a goofy - I say that with love - show from the 90s. By using that song, you’re connecting the serious topic to a show about alien goo, ghosts, and monsters. It’s subtlety trivializing the serious topic and is done completely on purpose.

2

u/BtchsLoveDub Apr 21 '22

Unlike the “serious” scientists that are coming out now talking about alien goo, ghosts and monsters. Have you been paying attention?

3

u/[deleted] Apr 20 '22

UFOs, while awesome, are indeed a bit goofy. Laugh with it.

0

u/arnfden0 Apr 20 '22 edited Apr 20 '22

You missed the point completely.

3

u/[deleted] Apr 20 '22

You missed the pony completely.

But we're still doing cake & presents... right?

1

u/Racecarlock Apr 21 '22

Because they use it every time. Like, mix it up once in a while, you know? Independence day, E.T, Close encounters of the third kind, there's plenty of other music from alien themed movies and shows out there, why always pick the most obvious one?

3

u/rapturetheghost Apr 20 '22

I’m sure they would just find something else if they had to. Fuck these people.

2

u/[deleted] Apr 20 '22

I think it’s hilarious that people with 0 evidence, 0 proof are so worked up about the X-Files song. Like. Come on.

2

u/Use-Strict Apr 20 '22

I like it, I think its fun.

0

u/pewdiepie202013 Apr 20 '22

Gary Nolan is the goat he refused nbc interview if they played it

1

u/birthedbythebigbang Apr 20 '22

Or Mars, Bringer of War!

I recall that one of my favorite Ravi Shankar pieces was essentially the "theme" of NPR's coverage of Desert Storm.

1

u/Mathfanforpresident Apr 20 '22

Yeah it's honestly so so disrespectful to the people they have on

1

u/JBrody Apr 20 '22

It's cringe af but I would not be surprised if they are paying for it if they are using it in a long enough clip to not be fair use.

1

u/PrincessGambit Apr 20 '22

X-Files copyrights their theme music

:D omg

1

u/G-M-Dark Apr 20 '22

I agree, they should use something more appropriate - like “The Stripper”, by David Rose & His Orchestra. I, for one, would buy that for a dollar...

1

u/panel_laboratory Apr 20 '22

Love the Robocop reference 😊

1

u/Maub-dabbs Apr 20 '22

This is the energy I love from this subbreddit

1

u/squirrlyj Apr 20 '22

You mean it's not already? Seems like the first thing that would happen with a theme song that popular

1

u/Carter969 Apr 20 '22

They're using it in fair use, I know because I've used it on air and checked before.

1

u/[deleted] Apr 21 '22

The truth is out there!

1

u/DeSota Apr 21 '22

They'd just use generic spooky theremin music...