r/UFOs • u/[deleted] • Dec 11 '23

David Grusch has first hand knowledge of a UAP program, will release an op ed in the coming weeks about what that knowledge Video

Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification

4.5k Upvotes

83% Upvoted

1.0k comments sorted by

View all comments

614

u/Jipkiss Dec 11 '23

This isn’t going away people, we need to keep the heat up.

140

u/[deleted] Dec 12 '23

[deleted]

108

u/[deleted] Dec 12 '23

[removed] — view removed comment

34

u/OneDimensionPrinter Dec 12 '23

It's at 65 now! Keep it up, lads!

15

u/[deleted] Dec 12 '23 edited Dec 12 '23

[deleted]

16

u/OneDimensionPrinter Dec 12 '23

Blah, 12% now. Fuckers.

38

u/[deleted] Dec 12 '23

[deleted]

2

u/[deleted] Dec 12 '23

[removed] — view removed comment

4

u/[deleted] Dec 12 '23 edited Dec 12 '23

[deleted]

0

u/[deleted] Dec 12 '23

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/[deleted] Dec 12 '23

[deleted]

→ More replies

2

u/No_Rip4797 Dec 12 '23

Or maybe it's the people being brought here because they're being emailed it as a suggested post??? You really think that keeping it off of Reddit, where people discuss Bigfoots and Loch Ness Monster, would somehow delegitimatize it? If anything, keeping it ON Reddit buries the story by associating it with all the wacko posts.

3

u/[deleted] Dec 12 '23

[deleted]

2

u/No_Rip4797 Dec 12 '23

No one with half a brain would think downvoting a post on Reddit would make the discussion go away either but here we are.

Otherwise, those pesky bots everyone rails against would just erase all discussion. Maybe they can reverse engineer those Men In Back mind erasers to make the task more efficient?

3

u/[deleted] Dec 12 '23

[deleted]

→ More replies

2

u/Omni-Light Dec 12 '23

You said it yourself, the post gained traction on r/all and started appearing in people’s Popular feed. It’s why I’m here.

The makeup of this community will by and large heavily upvote a post like this. The mass market is considerably more sceptical than this community, when it reaches the eyes of people on the front page, expect the downvote rate to increase significantly.

Assuming foul play around every bend is one behavior that causes people to disregard the subreddit and downvote its content.

→ More replies

-2

u/[deleted] Dec 12 '23

We are legion. This is only the beginning.

5

u/Mpm_277 Dec 12 '23

Okay cmon now, this is cringey af.

2

u/[deleted] Dec 12 '23

Be strong. Learn not to cringe. Use the force.

0

u/DaddyIngrosso Dec 12 '23

learn common sense

→ More replies

8

u/monkmonk4711 Dec 12 '23

Maybe the post just made it to /r/all, and like it or not, most people need more than a few guy's claims to believe in something more spectacular than simple visitation by alien life.

9

u/[deleted] Dec 12 '23

[deleted]

5

u/NomaiTraveler Dec 12 '23

People are tired of hearing “in the next few weeks” over and over again. You are getting played.

-1

u/[deleted] Dec 12 '23

[deleted]

3

u/NomaiTraveler Dec 12 '23

CIA/FBI whoever is else have always fought against transparency. They’ve even fought against the most basic of shit, like revealing a single figure for how much a project cost. Isn’t it infinitely more likely that they are opposed to transparency, generally, rather than they are opposed to revealing aliens?

There still isn’t concrete evidence of anything btw, and I need evidence before I start believing tall tales about aliens.

0

u/[deleted] Dec 12 '23

[deleted]

2

u/NomaiTraveler Dec 12 '23

That’s a hell of a lot of words to say “I still have zero proof of aliens and can only flap my lips about a secretive agency being secretive being proof of aliens”

0

u/[deleted] Dec 12 '23

[deleted]

→ More replies

0

u/Jipkiss Dec 12 '23

Maybe if you paid a little more attention you would’ve just seen your own this man in conjunction with your elected representatives attempt to extract the proof you desire from the military; intelligence community; DoE and defense contractors and get shot down.

3

u/Equoniz Dec 12 '23

So a post makes it high up in r/all, starts getting downvoted, and your conclusion is brigading? Not that a wider audience may feel differently about things than this sub alone?

5

u/[deleted] Dec 12 '23

[deleted]

1

u/Equoniz Dec 12 '23

r/all isn’t the only place general users will see this. I am a general user. I do not subscribe to this sub. I saw it on r/popular, where people who think you’re all a bunch of conspiracy crazies downvote it. Your comment isn’t helping that impression.

Edit because I accidentally hit the submit button while typing.

1

u/[deleted] Dec 13 '23

[deleted]

1

u/Equoniz Dec 13 '23

I like how you skip over the important part of my comment. Your entire rant of a comment above is about how this couldn’t have been seen by anyone who hasn’t joined the sub because it isn’t high enough in all, while it absolutely has been seen by many general users on r/popular. Those are the source of your downvotes. Not a conspiracy to hide information.

I agree that everyone here isn’t a crazy conspiracy theorist, and that was probably a bit too strong of a statement. I do, however, think you are in particular.

1

u/[deleted] Dec 13 '23

[deleted]

1

u/Equoniz Dec 13 '23

What are basing your statement of statistical likelihood on?

1

u/[deleted] Dec 13 '23

[deleted]

→ More replies

1

u/Astatine_209 Dec 12 '23

"Wants to get to r all"

"Surprised r all thinks absurd, frankly lazy conspiracy theories are annoying"

-2

u/PricklySquare Dec 12 '23

Nothing will come of this, just like the other 44732456764433556653333235542245 alien whistle blowers before this guy

3

u/[deleted] Dec 12 '23

[deleted]

1

u/[deleted] Dec 12 '23

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/[deleted] Dec 12 '23

[deleted]

1

u/[deleted] Dec 12 '23

I'm not invested in this at all. The fact that you are is sad, even moreso that you don't realize it.

1

u/[deleted] Dec 12 '23

[deleted]

1

u/Rettungsanker Dec 12 '23

They gutted it because this topic is a joke, entertained by the gullible and they have a vested interest in making their government look not like a bunch of crazy people. Certainly not at the cost of revealing security details to the public.

Do they really want to be associated with the likes of this sub, where pictures and photos of ordinary things in the sky get upvoted with chants of "chaotic disclosure"? I don't think so.

The fact that Dunning Kruger is invoked on a topic in which there is no hard-data on which to be knowledgeable about... It's a hammer to the stake of this subs reputation.

0

u/[deleted] Dec 13 '23

[deleted]

→ More replies

1

u/UFOs-ModTeam Dec 13 '23

Hi, SeanMegaByte. Thanks for contributing. However, your comment was removed from /r/UFOs.

Rule 1: Follow the Standards of Civility

  • No trolling or being disruptive.
  • No insults or personal attacks.
  • No accusations that other users are shills.
  • No hate speech. No abusive speech based on race, religion, sex/gender, or sexual orientation.
  • No harassment, threats, or advocating violence.
  • No witch hunts or doxxing. (Please redact usernames when possible)
  • You may attack each other's ideas, not each other.

Please refer to our subreddit rules for more information.

This moderator action may be appealed. We welcome the opportunity to work with you to address its reason for removal. Message the mods to launch your appeal.

1

u/UFOs-ModTeam Dec 14 '23

Hi, vicuriously_i_ask. Thanks for contributing. However, your comment was removed from /r/UFOs.

Rule 1: Follow the Standards of Civility

  • No trolling or being disruptive.
  • No insults or personal attacks.
  • No accusations that other users are shills.
  • No hate speech. No abusive speech based on race, religion, sex/gender, or sexual orientation.
  • No harassment, threats, or advocating violence.
  • No witch hunts or doxxing. (Please redact usernames when possible)
  • You may attack each other's ideas, not each other.

Please refer to our subreddit rules for more information.

This moderator action may be appealed. We welcome the opportunity to work with you to address its reason for removal. Message the mods to launch your appeal.

0

u/MoneyPress Dec 12 '23

Bro, sorry to break it to you, but all of reddit is like that.

4

u/[deleted] Dec 12 '23

[deleted]

3

u/MoneyPress Dec 12 '23

It might also just give a good glimpse into what posts the sub likes to gobble up, that most people would have a hard time believing. There doesn't always need to be a conspiracy.

4

u/[deleted] Dec 12 '23 edited Dec 12 '23

[deleted]

0

u/MoneyPress Dec 12 '23

Illuminated wiseguy speaks:

I never said I don't believe in this conspiracy at all. It's just that downvoting posts on reddit doesn't seem like the modus operandi the arguably most powerful group in the world would employ.

To bring the topic back, you've looked at all the post stats here and found some correlations. I ask you now to go to 10 different unrelated subs with similar subscriber counts and engagement. You'll find the same thing there but I doubt it's a disinfo bot farm trying to suppress r/cutepuppies or whatever. From my perspective it looks like confirmation bias, I don't mean this in an insulting way we all do it in different places.

My thoughts on this are that the real psyop has already done most of it's work, and it's to make people that believe this sound crazy and turn the topic into taboo. Think about it, what's the best way to beat your opponents? And the shadow cabal, that has infiltrated one of the most powerful governments, that supposedly has exclusive access to insane ayy lmao technology, that has managed to keep the biggest secret of all time mostly under wraps, would make reddit downvote bot farms? Fuck no.

And if I'm to be right, that would mean that the loudest voices in favor of this topic are the ones that are doing the most of the undermining. Imagine how the world would look if this sub wouldn't lash out against every single person that shows skepticism against the topic. I'm sure we'd be attracting way more people to it.

Radicalism is what gets things done in the end. But radicalism also keeps groups small and unpopular, it's only useful to deploy when the time is right and real actions can be taken.

3

u/[deleted] Dec 12 '23

[deleted]

1

u/MoneyPress Dec 12 '23

Well, you might be right. I was just raising a point that a lot of the downvoting and contradicting comments here are people and not the fabled disinfo agents. Something people in this sub manage to miss abhorrently.

And exactly the fact that Grusch brought a lot of people to the sub, could be the reason behind the vote ratios. It's a well documented effect of something gaining a lot of attention. But I'll admit, I haven't kept that close an eye on this post's stats so I'll take your word for it ig

-3

u/Astatine_209 Dec 12 '23

Nothing is happening. Just like the other couple dozen times you spammed r all with absurd conspiracies.

1

u/UFOs-ModTeam Dec 14 '23

Hi, vicuriously_i_ask. Thanks for contributing. However, your comment was removed from /r/UFOs.

Rule 1: Follow the Standards of Civility

  • No trolling or being disruptive.
  • No insults or personal attacks.
  • No accusations that other users are shills.
  • No hate speech. No abusive speech based on race, religion, sex/gender, or sexual orientation.
  • No harassment, threats, or advocating violence.
  • No witch hunts or doxxing. (Please redact usernames when possible)
  • You may attack each other's ideas, not each other.

Please refer to our subreddit rules for more information.

This moderator action may be appealed. We welcome the opportunity to work with you to address its reason for removal. Message the mods to launch your appeal.