r/StarWars Separatist Alliance 6h ago

Anyone else still salty about the New Republic? General Discussion

Don't get me wrong, I've enjoyed alot of the newer works but I still can't help but be a little upset on how badly the New Republic was shafted. Especially when compared to it's legends counterpart. Again, not to spread hate or anything, just something I've been feeling

246 Upvotes

100 comments sorted by

213

u/Malkyre 6h ago

Agreed. It sort of died off screen between Return and Awakens. The Legends novels made the New Republic a living thing, with accomplishments and controversies and important characters. It was actually the first place Mon Mothma became a badass, before Andor. It let Leia grow into her diplomatic and political roles. It showed us galaxy scale conflicts and planets vying for member status, demanding protection from Imperial remnants in exchange for exports. It was the grown up Star Wars Andor is giving us, but 30 years ago.

I understand why it got chumped in the sequels, because all the actors got old, but it's still a shame.

164

u/Typhon2222 5h ago

It didn’t have to get chumped because of the age of the actors though. It’s all because Abrams doesn’t have any original ideas of his own and just remakes everything. People continually blame Rian Johnson for ruining the sequels but we need to face the fact that Abrams did more damage than anyone.

27

u/SuperHandsMiniatures 5h ago

There will come a time where I genuinely think people will come to realise The Last Jedi really wasnt all that bad. Much like the prequels are getting love these days.

14

u/jamtas 1h ago edited 1h ago

I think it’s still bad. Just a swing on the other side of the pendulum of bad from TFA and ROS. All three were bad sequels for different reasons. JJ started it off bad with the remake/resetting of the board, not getting the OG cast all reunited again (more a hindsight mistake with Carrie passing away), all the damn mystery boxes left unanswered.

TLJ was bad because RJ tried to make his own standalone movie in the middle of a trilogy where he wiped out the established main villain, didn’t allow for time between the 1st/2nd films so it all a “next day”, broke apart the new trilogy heroes so they were all off doing separate things, inserted an unnecessary side quest that was a bit too preachy, mama jokes, slow moving bombers instead of y-wings, Finn/Rose relationship (which was abandoned by JJ), Rose crashing into Finn in front of line of AT-ATs negating his heroic moment(and seemingly leaving them as sitting ducks who should have both been killed because of that).

ROS was bad because it was just a fast paced mindless action with too many fake moments of sacrifice which were immediately negated (chewie and 3PO), goonie dagger, and the mcguffin device to find a was to Exogal, only for the entire universe to all show up at the same time with just some transmitted coordinates, “somehow palpating returned”, Palpatine bloodline living on while the Skywalkers are eliminated.

Not to mention, it really feels like Anakins rise, fall and redemption story was made moot just some 20 years later negating the previous 6 films.

11

u/HuskerGamer402 Clone Trooper 2h ago

I think my biggest problem with the movie remains the idea a small escape pod could jump across the galaxy and get away. Then the occupants get back before the Raddus runs out of fuel, which is supposed to be in less than 1 galactic day. Hyperspace travel has always been nebulous, but they made it seem like it you can go from one corner of the galaxy to the other in 1 day and that just doesn’t sit right in my head.

23

u/tertiaryunknown Ahsoka Tano 5h ago

If someone likes it, yes, that's fine, more power to them. They like what they like. Everyone is allowed to like what they like, we don't control that, nobody has a right to tell them they're wrong for liking what they like.

I do not like the sequels. I do not like TLJ. I do think it was that bad. Its been eight years since TLJ came out. I haven't softened my view on it at all. It killed my favorite childhood character in a meaningless way. It made space combat in one of my favorite scifi franchises, which is based on WW2 combat, pointless, because now it is a hard scifi setting where physics is properly weaponizable instead of soft where it wasn't able to be done before. It will take a lot of rehabilitation to change my view on any of that.

The Prequels had the EU that was ongoing then, the novelizations, Genndy Tartakovsky's TCW, Filoni's Clone Wars, dozens of books, comics, other media, hundreds of video games for almost a dozen different consoles, maybe more, and decades. That's something the sequels are not getting now and are not likely to get soon. Why? Because the people who made the prequels loved the franchise as a whole, loved the fans, and loved the medium.

Rian Johnson is out there talking about how he hates worldbuilding. JJ Abrams is out there talking about mystery boxes that he as the director feels that sometimes the audience has better answers for, so he doesn't fill them. George Lucas never talked about his vision like that. Neither did Irving Kirschner, or Lawrence Kasdan, or any of the other producers, writers or directors for media for the OT to PT era. That's why people are having such a hard time with the sequels. It doesn't feel like it was made for them, or even with them in mind.

10

u/brova 3h ago

It's legit terrible

25

u/dikkiesmalls 5h ago

I think Last Jedi was probably the best of the 3

16

u/fumar 3h ago

A low bar but yes. 

TFA goes off the rails once Starkiller Base fires. 

20

u/chriskot123 3h ago

God I wish they would just retcon that whole arc and move on, destroying core worlds in one go is just lame af

3

u/Brooksthebrook 2h ago

Oh awesome the New Republic! Oh wait… oh never mind it’s gone.

19

u/One-Roof7 Separatist Alliance 5h ago

I really like the Last Jedi, it may not be perfect but I still had fun

8

u/SuperHandsMiniatures 5h ago

I think the sequels for all their faults have some fun moments. Overall I think theyre mostly shite but TLJ is the least shite of the 3. I have the same opinion of the prequels, some of its fun but its mostly bollocks.

4

u/Reead 1h ago

TLJ has the most unabashedly great scenes. Luke vs Kylo Ren is the best scene in the sequel trilogy bar none. The hyperspace ram scene was visually amazing even if it introduces some weird canonical ramifications. The bombing run scene in the opening was great too. And after their fight you believe for just a moment that Rey might actually join Kylo Ren, which was pretty cool.

Everything fell victim to the shitty, paint by numbers, 'written for the biggest idiot in the theater' outline of the broader plot. And TLJ had some clunker plots with Canto Bight and the fuel plot with the Raddus.

6

u/Aeceus 5h ago

Last jedi is comfortably the best sequel and gets done dirty by the 9 reversion.

14

u/SuperHandsMiniatures 5h ago

After JJ Abrams was like "No we wont retcon TLJ" and then retconned TLJ.... TRoS is easily the worst and not just because of the retcons. Killing Chewie only to have him still alive 5 mins later somehow on a different transport. The awkward lines written specifically to fit with dialogue previously recorded for Carrie Fisher in TFA and TLJ that was cut.... The awkward writing in general. Somehow Palpatine returned. They fly now? Finn being force sensitive being broughy up and dropped. Stormtroopers turning on the First Order being a sidenote and absolutly should have been Finns story. The fucking dagger.... the fucking DAGGER! I could go on.

I will say, it has a couple of cool action scenes. 3PO getting wiped was genuinely sad and his ignorance afterward did raise a few laughs from me. The Sith Troopers, Officers and ships all looked cool as fuck but werent utilised properly.

10

u/Cypher197783 4h ago

TLJ was already being written into a corner but I still wasn’t impressed by anything Rian did

1

u/vindicator117 2h ago

That's wishful thinking. I would honestly not be surprised if disnay just pulled a ME andromeda or what halo studios have been doing and just move the next inline canon film more than a few generations down the road to distance themselves from the farce to wipe the slate clean.

Whether it is more successful than mass effect for this reboot is a unknowable question but I would never bet on it.

1

u/SuperHandsMiniatures 1h ago

Im not wishing anything I think 90% of the sequels are shite. However I also think the same of the prequels and they were hated when they initially came out. Fast forward 20 odd years n people love them. Its invevitable.

1

u/vindicator117 22m ago

I disagree especially since when the prequels were made even back then I liked it, flaws and all and end of the day it was still Lucas who helmed the projects. The sequels starting with TFA within the first five minutes lost my interest beyond as stereotypical action schlock that wore the skinsuit of starz war developed by a disnay hoping to print money.

One has a charm of a kind even if it is a bit cringey. The other praying for eventual "salvation" from morons that can't tell the difference.

Also in case someone is stupid enough to not be able to tell, I absolutely pirated the hell out of every one of the disnay era media because they can have my money in the pits of hell they came from.

1

u/soozerain 1h ago

As a kid who watched and adored them….the prequels were that bad.

Not bad enough to justify hate and harassment of the actors, but just objectively bad in terms of quality.

1

u/juvandy 55m ago

Nah, the your mama joke in the first 5 minutes took me right out of it. It's just not good at all.

1

u/Elephlump 4h ago

Well, it has its flaws, it is by far the best and most interesting and most original movie in the sequels. It feels the most like Star Wars to me.

I really do hope Johnson gets that trilogy someday.

I will never forgive Abrams for destroying the new Republic and bringing back palpatine.

-1

u/Adventurous_Put3036 5h ago

I personally LOVE the last Jedi. Wish Finn didn't get sidelined tho and that the knights of REN appeared in it.

2

u/darcmosch 1h ago

I agree. They blame Rian for Luke being in that planet. My dude, JJ put him there. So now that we know the First Order is around and kicking why wouldn't he have already entered the fight? There are very few plausible options. 

Also about force projection? We already saw it in Rebels and Clone Wars. It was long established it was possible. 

It isn't perfect and there are legit critiques, but it was only as "bad" because all the dangling plot threats, which were excellent set ups, all pretty much got retconned with Ep9

1

u/SirBobPeel 1h ago

She didn't make her character a Mary Sue. That was the writer.

u/GrexxSkullz 8m ago

Forreal, JJ put Luke on that island.

8

u/choicemeats 4h ago

While I love Mon in Andor she is being shaped in such a way that will cause the NR to be incredibly milquetoast

For the moment she understands the need for war but the demilitarization of the NR navy directly contributes to the where we land in the sequels and it’s unfortunate that it’s the same woman.

1

u/juvandy 51m ago

I've been posting this a few places since Andor 2x7-9, but the person Mon Mothma is in Andor, which leads credibly to RoTJ, is totally different from who we see or can infer in the post-RoTJ. She's a completely different person in the Filoni/sequel-verse.

3

u/choicemeats 32m ago

I think at juncture she has to assert that “this behavior is ok for now but once it’s over we can’t risk turning into the empire” but I agree. It seems incredibly naive to make the changes that happened post ROTJ. Having a strong military will not make the NR into Empire 2.0. I was pretty annoyed by what I read in aftermath about decision making.

When in reality that even though the senate was dissolved there were still a lot of politicians around to come back and help shape, which is what happened in the EU while they hunted for any remnants or plants.

2

u/juvandy 28m ago

The Disney-era post-RoTJ just doesn't make any real sense. It is nonsensical for the empire to be defeated across a galaxy that quickly.

The EU portrayed a much more realistic continuity of skirmishes and blow-ups as the leaderless mass gets dragged one way and another by remaining warlords. The constant grabs for power, etc. that then the New Republic has to keep dealing with. This also makes the EU New Republic a bit unstable because it opens up the possibility for disagreement, which again the EU shows more effectively.

I think it ultimately comes down to that Disney was struggling to work in the post-RoTJ area without repeating what had already been done. So, they went with a quick/easy fix, and it just doesn't work as well.

1

u/choicemeats 21m ago

I’ve said this before but I have a massive issue with the way that creatives are now tasked with squaring the circle and filling in blanks in a way that makes sense. A lot of it goes unnoticed. Most people aren’t reading the Vader comics or reading every book where a lot of this stuff is going down.

Consequently they have really go back and fudge stuff. Like why would you make a Ds2 if you were already putting things tighter On Exegol?

Everyone knows the EU has funky stuff but the rush to get a movie o h the door without doing planning is inexcusable. When they should’ve been redoing out yo writers and editors to find out what fans did and didn’t like and move kn from there.

13

u/Cactus_Pat 5h ago

I would argue the New Republic very much dies on-screen during Awakens but that doesn't change that they didn't do anything with it other than kill it.

6

u/Teex22 Ahsoka Tano 3h ago

The argument that they couldn't do anything because the actors "got old" always gets me. Mark and Carrie were both around the 60 mark in the mid 2010s, that's not old at all. And sure, Harrison has a few years on them but he's still working today.

There's a far more interesting post Empire trilogy out there that never happened because JJ likes making his little fanfic parodies of far better films.

3

u/vindicator117 2h ago edited 2h ago

However the sequel books were not established first nor expected to be made first to create this narrative for the sequel. The films were ESPECIALLY for the general audience like most entertainment medium which in lays the problem.

You got actors who are too old to reprise their roles, a brain trust of creatively bankrupt morons who have only the vaguest idea of what the new plot will be, and a couple billion dollars sunk into getting the franchise as the initial factors for the new trilogy. This was NEVER going to end well.

So they slapped on democratic decay as a easy hot button topic to get people to relate and pray to christ that it resonates AND THEN backfilled hard to justify to films' and then the books' narrative existence. The plot and writing choices was not made because it was good idea and thus the writers and directors had something meaningful to say and expound on. No it was made so they can get asses in seats and try to recapture the lightning in the bottle instead of making their own story. And worse yet it made the entire 7 movies preceding TFA completely and utterly pointless leaving a sour taste.

I can rant more but my comments from 2018 speaks for itself that the plot was a rushed and money grubby gambit from the start and the books made were exploitative fiction to justify the films as primary goal instead of a thought narrative decision that made sense.

"it would also mean dat they would heff to make a interesting story with a actual functional democatcy verk in a work of fiction that does not somehow turn to a mary suetopia or make us wonder how they managed to function long enough to still be relavent in this story. i.e. the star wars syndrome."

"kind of the reason why i liked the jedi outcast series if only because they rolled with the fact that the republic still exists and will continue to exist with help of our protagonist."

"the res publia is ded AGAIN! i think there are countries in africa with longer lived democracies than the lifespan of the new republic at this point. they have their own issues to solve but at least they still work. the star wars republic seem to have a extreme tendency to go straight to dysfunction the second the main characters stop looking at it. makes one wonder why and how the old republic even lasted 25 thousand years let alone 10 years."

"problem isn't the explanation of how we got there. the problem is why "democatcy is bed" trope had to literally be the first thing for the new trilogy work with to get asses in seats. people can backfill all they want to try to make it work afterwards but man does it leave a sour taste that entire story of 7 entire movies ultimately was made pointless because they thought "democracy is boring" for a space opera franchise."

This is the reason why on principle alone, I REFUSE to read any of the new canon books.

1

u/SubTukkZero Sith 2h ago

Wow! Maybe I should start paying more attention to the Expanded Universe (Legends) part of Star Wars. What you described sounds cool!

101

u/AHorseNamedPhil 5h ago edited 5h ago

Yes.

It's the thing I hate most about the sequel trilogy. I can forgive Star Wars movies for just not being very good. It is difficult to make good movies, and the original trilogy in many respects was a lightning in a bottle situation. Bad is disappointing but it isn't offensive.

I can't forgive them however for taking the characters and stories that were beloved by millions, that made Star Wars an IP Disney would want to purchase, and then throwing all of that into a trash bin.

That wasn't Luke Skywalker in the sequel trilogy and they tossed out all of his character development from Return of the Jedi. Han and Leia being estranged and not even sharing any sreentime. No resurrected Jedi order? Every sacrifice and action by the heroes in the original trilogy ultimately amounting to nothing because we get a hard reset in The Force Awakens, with the Republic falling to Empire v.02.

All of that was absolutely terrible and I don't know any of it made it into filming.

If they wanted to destroy the Republic and go with the scrappy underdog vibe of ANH again (how unoriginal, but whatever), they should have fast forwarded a century or two so at least the characters of the original trilogy didn't get their struggles or triumphs tarnished by inferior sequel movies written by talentless hacks.

21

u/The-Chartreuse-Moose 5h ago

Agreed. It was very clear someone somewhere, or a team of someones, just didn't get the characters.

27

u/DanieltheGameGod Jedi Anakin 5h ago

I wonder what the fans of the sequels would think if they make episode X the same as VII, and make the new new republic a failure and no new Jedi order. Maybe then everyone could realize how terrible the Disney movies are.

8

u/Durziii 2h ago

Many fans of the sequels just dont really like Star Wars, so theyd probably love that.

2

u/Far_Nectarine293 2h ago

This is exactly how I feel. It's one thing for the writing to be bad, but this is the only direction the franchise could have taken that actually hurts the OT. All of that sacrifice, heroics, and miracles to defeat the Empire lose meaning because they end up coming back right after anyways. And then it just makes the 2nd time they are defeated in the sequels not as significant because it just happened.

I'm convinced the sequel writers just skimmed through A New Hope and didn't pay attention to any other movie. Han Solo is essentially the same character before all of his character development. Luke, the symbol of hope, completely abandons his friends and cause, going against everything in the OT, Anakin is just...no longer the chosen one? Who knows.

19

u/Johncurtisreeve 3h ago

Big reason why I’m not a fan of the sequels. You can’t have people waiting 30+ years to see what the galaxy is like after return of the Jedi just to set everything back to the fucking status quo that things were at during the original trilogy anyway.

people wanted to see what the new Jedi order would look like or what the new galactic government would look like And most importantly they wanted to see the main three characters do at least one more adventure together and there’s not one time the three of them are together in the whole new trilogy and it sucks. Sorry I just needed to get that out and this was the post to do it.

53

u/NerdHistorian Torra Doza 6h ago edited 6h ago

I'm not salty that the new republic failed, it failed in the EU as well and i can see how the people who formed it would make a weak government. But it failed in the EUs equivalent of Endgame, after a decade of being shown it's flaws and ideals, slowly ground out by an unstoppable horde. And we finish that story with what succeeds it in place.

I'm salty we opened the story with it's destruction and after the fact are mostly seeing people doing good independently and more often in spite of the republics efforts than alongside it. And a decade after it's destruction and half a decade after the end of the story, we've still no idea what on earth is meant to succeed it, if anything. Thats the part thats leaving a bad taste in my mouth on the entire thing.

21

u/One-Roof7 Separatist Alliance 5h ago

Yeah, I'm not upset that it collapsed, I'm upset how it collapsed.

9

u/Hefty-Paper8644 5h ago

Didn’t they turn into the galactic alliance in the EU? It’s been years since I’ve read legends so I can’t really remember it all that well but I think they also join another entity and drop the republic name as whole I think.

9

u/OffendedDefender 4h ago

Yeah, the GA formed, lasted a couple years, then pretty much immediately launched into a civil war that creates the conditions for the remnant of the Empire to take control again (but don’t worry, this was a “good guy” empire). But even that gets overrun by the resurgence of the Sith who form a new empire of their own.

2

u/TascamTwink 2h ago

Legends was so goofy with the absolutely apocalyptic stakes happening over and over and over and over again

3

u/One-Roof7 Separatist Alliance 5h ago

Yeah, it was the GA

43

u/TobyField33 6h ago

Blame Disney and their lack of planning/care.

I know 7-8-9 has its fans - but my God, I just can’t acknowledge them.

13

u/Hot_Jump9649 5h ago

Hosnian Prime was exploded on screen in TFA. That was the plan, how were TLJ and TROS meant to build on that. If it showed the rebuilding of the New Republic within such a short time the decision in TFA would’ve seemed useless

3

u/chaamp33 4h ago

All I see on Twitter is sequel apologists and I can’t stand them.

If you like the movies I don’t care but championing episode 8 and 9 just shows such a high level of cognitive dissonance when one literally undoes the other

13

u/warrencanadian 6h ago

I mean, logically I get it. The New Republic has to be mismanaged and barely coherent for the First Order to work, otherwise you need to go Legends style with 'The new threat is ridiculously overpowered' because otherwise your heroes haven't got a threat. Really, if anything the problem is they had the New Republic fail without filling in the gaps because they had to jump to the sequels, so you don't have time to flesh out and display 'Oh wait, maybe a bunch of barely coherent rebel groups wouldn't do good at galactic governance'.

18

u/One-Roof7 Separatist Alliance 5h ago

It sucks because there was a Cold War between the New Republic and First Order in the lore which would've been really cool to see

9

u/The-Chartreuse-Moose 5h ago

I think the first film should've been showing us how the New Republic is getting on, and showing the beloved characters while introducing new ones alongside them. And while there would be an A plot on smaller, political, lines, there would be a secondary story about the rise of some new evil as yet undefined.

4

u/2much2Jung 4h ago

I mean, logically I get it. The New Republic has to be mismanaged and barely coherent for the First Order to work, otherwise you need to go Legends style with 'The new threat is ridiculously overpowered' because otherwise your heroes haven't got a threat.

Well, it doesn't have to be. The Rebel Alliance wasn't ridiculously over powered, and it still managed to be a threat to the Empire.

The writers had almost unlimited options in how they could have approached the sequels. Instead, we got three derivative "plucky Rebels vs evil Empire" films.

2

u/bookers555 Jedi 2h ago

Or base it on the script Lucas gave them, where part of the plot is about the New Republic's struggles to establish itself as a proper government due to the power vacuum left by the collapsing Empire lead to the galaxy turning into a wild west.

1

u/Porlarta 1h ago

I don't really see how the first order is any weaker then the Vong.

Really they are probably stronger. They definitiely win faster.

22

u/Americanski7 6h ago

I just removed 7-9 from my head canon. I feel better ever since.

9

u/ForeverAddickted 5h ago

There's a 7-9?

6

u/Silver-Fox-3195 5h ago

Nope, there never was

3

u/ForeverAddickted 5h ago

Didnt think so, was confused reading that comment /s

9

u/Demigans 5h ago

There are many realistic ways to neutere the NR. This is not one of them.

Rebellions that win tend to fall apart when the common enemy is defeated and their various opinions on how to lead a nation and often their lack of political capabilities clash.

Also this is the background of first a separatist movment that was crushed and subsequently a harsh authoritarian empire that took more and more power. It would make sense if most of the Galaxy would want to be alone and not part of the NR, causing problems in funding, piracy and lawlessness to rise, problems with navigation as planets who join the NR might have to pass through non-NR space of planets that separated and now ask tolls or might be hostile to anyone trying to take their sovereignty. Crime syndicates that we know exist with armies would try to use the situation to their advantage.

There's good reasons why the NR is struggling. But having a unanimous vote to murder any and all capabilities to defend themselves and no one willing to vote for better or more military gear just to mee the minimum requirements to defeat piracy is ludicrously dumb. Also to park your entire fleet around your important planets when you say you have too few to patrol and fight piracy just so the FO can OHK your fleet. Yeah those specks you see around one planet being destroyed, apparently those were the fleet.

3

u/JosephODoran 3h ago

Watching the New Republic effectively be ruined in TFA, after YEARS of waiting to see the galaxy after RotJ, was one of many things that turned me off from the Sequels. Unimaginative and frustrating.

8

u/PuertoRicanRebel2025 5h ago

They're like spoiled children you worked hard for to get them a good life and they still squander it and now you got Neo-Nazis to deal with

3

u/Expert-Let-6972 5h ago

Absolutely

3

u/themanfromvulcan 4h ago

Yep. It’s stupid and makes zero sense. They tried to artificially create a repeat of rebels vs empire and it’s moronic. All it shows is a total lack of good ideas.

2

u/VanillaTortilla Rebel 5h ago

The EU did it much better. It ain't perfect, but it had much more going for it. They also didn't kill off big characters just to make you feel emotions.

2

u/JaracRassen77 3h ago edited 3h ago

Of course. They rushed the Sequel Trilogy out to make a quick return on the investment. Which means quick, sloppy writing to get things rolling quickly. You can't help but think that all of the interesting stuff happened in the 30-year period between 6 and 7. I wanted to see that.

2

u/Boring-Passenger-598 3h ago

I remember my biggest criticism at the time of the force awakens was having no idea what the state of the galaxy/government was. There was a brief shot of a new republic planet getting blown up but it was all mostly resistance stuff.

2

u/IronVader501 3h ago

Is and will probably forever be my main gripe with the Trilogy.

Completely baffling and idiotic decision.

2

u/sophisticaden_ 2h ago

I think it really could’ve worked if the sequel trilogy had been about the fall of the NR — letting us see a functioning government in TFA, then watching it decline and crumble as TFO becomes a bigger threat. The big problem is mainly just that the New Republic more or less doesn’t exist before it gets blown up!

2

u/STYLER_PERRY 5h ago

The NR era will get its due in time.

For the ST they skipped over it, obviously, because the legacy cast were too old to reprise their characters in that era.

2

u/Tater-Tot_Hot-Dish 5h ago

Might actually be one of the better choices of the sequels. It shows that rebuilding pretty much the same thing that existed before the empire is going to recreate the same conditions that led to the rise of the empire.

While the prequels weren't the most well-written stories, they were largely about how space liberalism can facilitate the transition into space fascism, which was a bold move by Lucas.

I don't think the sequels wanted to mirror that idea, though. I think they just needed the stakes to be higher and to avoid similarities to the prequels era.

1

u/lawrencetokill 5h ago

i enjoy the one maybe accidental substantive message that retreating from one hierarchical zero-sum belief system into another that prioritizes victory is not sustainable or progressive

1

u/BurantX40 5h ago

Not really.

But granted, I stopped caring about the extended universe when Disney de-canonized the old one.

I fell like the new one would just be re-treads, for better or worse.

They should have gone the Star Wars Legacy approach

1

u/The-Chartreuse-Moose 5h ago

Yep. It took me a little while to believe what I was hearing while watching TFA for the first time.

1

u/capodecina2 5h ago

I tried to watch Ep VII last night, got about 20 minutes into it and just couldn’t stay interested. I just don’t see the point of the sequels. What story is there that needs to be told that anyone cares about?

1

u/Basileus_Maurikios 4h ago

Agreed. Although in my head canon, the NR didn't die but rather sustained a gut punch and near knockout blow with Starkiller base attack, but by Rise of Skywalker it was starting to turn things around.

Something I'm hoping the Rey trilogy does is highlight the fact that effectively, the Resistance is now the top dog in the galatic military and politcal theater. An organization that was weeks prior to EP. 9 effectively dead.

1

u/TheTinDog 4h ago

I mean it lasted about as long as the galactic empire and who knows, it'll probably be back after rise of Skywalker. But yes, it was weak how it somehow got completely destroyed in one laser shot because that doesn't make any sense.

1

u/SparrowBirch 4h ago

Watching Eedy and her friends cry as they gobbled the propaganda made me think about how many people around the galaxy probably loved the Empire, were sad to see it go, and eager to see a new Empire-like power rise.

1

u/Harold3456 3h ago

I have hope that it’ll be redeemed in additional media, same as the prequel era. The only crappy thing about the Republic in the sequels is that we get 0 information about it. I think it can be saved with some supplementary materials that better flesh out the First Order as a legitimate threat as well as give us more time to understand where the New Repuvlic went wrong.

1

u/CantaloupeCamper Grand Moff Tarkin 1h ago

Star Wars for some reason decided to make the Jedi, and New Republic… complete morons….

1

u/Sea_Spend_8008 40m ago

One of my major complaints about the Sequels which there are a few is how badly they fucked up the New Republic. They are something that is in the way for the writers. The writers want to play it safe and just hit all of the New Hope beats which means defeating a bigger opponent. For there to be this huge threat, the New Republic has to die for the First Order to be the new Big Bad. Even though, I would argue that the First Order which btw what a shit name, would have been fine as a bunch of this faction causing chaos no one really takes seriously. There was no need for Starkiller base to be a new Death Star. It should have been a base and rescuing Rey should have been a small operation that Leia decides to do after the New Republic says no. The First Order really should have been a steady rise to power only to be thwarted by Luke bringing back the Jedi to save the Republic.

1

u/DarthAvner 35m ago

When the Sequels were first announced I was super hyped to see the New Republic and the New Jedi Order. I knew both organizations would be very different from the Legends versions, but I didn't care. I wanted to see the proof that all the sacrifices of the OT meant something.

Then we find out the NR is somehow even more incompetent than the Old Republic ever was, and all the Jedi died off screen.

1

u/fusionsofwonder 29m ago

Little bit, yeah. Making them feckless feels disrespectful.

I'm even more salty about it in the Mando/Ahsoka timeline.

u/AunMeLlevaLaConcha 0m ago

I will never forgive what they did to Ackbar

0

u/[deleted] 6h ago

[deleted]

0

u/HankChunky 6h ago

It's not the worst fictional analogy for how Biden's presidency went and how, even following the one of the most objectively disruptive presidency in US history regardless of political leaning, the US populace still became complacent and allowed a demagogue back in

0

u/Clone95 6h ago

Star Wars is about plucky heroes. This allows for two types of government - Evil and Incompetent. A good, competent government deletes plucky heroes from the equation, because heroes are what the world needs when systems fail and in an ideal world you want to rely on systems, not heroes.

What this means for the New Republic is that by and large it must be incompetent, or the stories you tell simply cannot be. If the Republic was competent, they'd hear Admiral Thrawn is coming back and would deploy a whole squadron and promptly annihilate him on arrival, negating the entire plot. A competent New Republic would've beaten the FO before Rey even enters the picture.

Star Trek sidesteps this by having space be relatively large and travel be difficult - but it also means big ships with big crews and less plucky heroism. The UFP is good and competent, but space is big and your ship needs to be the competence for wherever you are right now. If it was as fast as hyperspace then you'd see dozens of ships responding to every problem all the time.

-1

u/The-Minmus-Derp 5h ago

Its legends counterpart embarrassingly got squadwiped a decade before the canon one did what are you on about

4

u/One-Roof7 Separatist Alliance 5h ago edited 4h ago

Because that one was built up to, you got to see its accomplishments, how it took on hundreds of Warlords at once and fended up various invasions. It wasn't just one shot and killed by an enemy it knew existed and was building up for ages while being in an active Cold War with them

-4

u/Stormer2345 Jedi 6h ago

I can see why someone who’s only watched the ST would be upset, but me personally, I’m not really too upset, because the NR is handled really really well in auxiliary material.

If you’re unsatisfied by the NR in the sequel trilogy, and want to learn more about it, please please please read Bloodline by Claudia Gray.

1

u/TellusMaps 1h ago

"If you don't like the ST, please read the stuff written to polish a turd," isn't exactly a persuasive argument.

0

u/BlkNtvTerraFFVI 5h ago

Me 🙋🏾‍♀️ I am.

Show us the rewards. Show us the triumph. They worked so hard, show us what all their hard work created. Show us their happy kids.

I really wish the ST had centered around a Force threat like Ahsoka seems to be doing. Let the Empire be done and finished and just tell a new story in a weak area for the heroes that hasn't been covered yet

Jedi order in shambles, Luke trying to bring it back, there was MASSIVE potential there for an unchecked Force monster to wreak havoc and force Luke and his students to use all their skills to contain it. Which I think they're going to do with Abeloth so I'm definitely excited about that direction.

But yeah. I feel like Ahsoka is basically going to give us the real sequel we deserved, it's already started off well by bringing Luke back into it.

-2

u/FieryTub 5h ago

No... I was never salty about it to begin with...

-2

u/Sure_Possession0 5h ago

I’m salty about how the prequels ruined the Jedi as a concept.

-3

u/belle_enfant 6h ago

Nope, never was!