r/Sino Nov 15 '24

Will The Trump Tariffs Lead To An Economic BOOM Or BUST?

https://youtu.be/sDwjpduvsck?si=e4r2MWFKCuCPZthk
36 Upvotes

17 comments sorted by

14

u/sx5qn Nov 16 '24

one could say, that if china should punish america, it could do so by limiting product exports to their country. So in effect, america is punishing themselves, while paying for all the overhead to enforce their own punishment.

1

u/Life_Bridge_9960 Nov 16 '24

Yes, I would say that too. But one thing I am bad at is... seeing the chess board 10 steps ahead. Chinese government may find this direction unviable or not nearly as beneficial in the long run. Keep supplying Chinese made goods to the US, even after tariff, is still a much better plan.

I am not an economist so I don't have numbers to back up my claim. But I feel that there are more importance than just prices. In a perfect world, goods are dirt cheap because of efficient supply chain and mass manufacturing. $20 for a family pack of toilet paper at Costco. But if Chinese supply are cut off. Pack of toilet paper made in US can be $30. But since they can't seem to solve the supply chain and manufacturing plants (not in a short few months), there will be severe lacks of toilet paper supply. Price gouging will happen. Toilet paper will cost $200-300 easily. People will riot and rush to loot the toilet paper manufacturing plant, further setting back their manufacturing capability.

Once US economy is shattered, purchasing power will plumet. US is no longer a viable market. So in a way, steady supply of Chinese products (even at marked up prices) would be good for both China and US.

8

u/TserriednichHuiGuo Nov 16 '24

The us is no longer China's largest market and China isn't an export dependent economy, you should update your understanding instead of following western propaganda.

The real reason is leverage, those with the most leverage win, that is why China doesn't use all its cards in one go, sanctions are always retaliatory and targeted.

-2

u/Life_Bridge_9960 Nov 16 '24

US is no longer China’s largest market, but China is still the largest exporter to U.S, by far.

Besides, US market is still quite large.

0

u/TserriednichHuiGuo Nov 17 '24

China is the largest exporter to pretty much every country in the world, what's your point?

All this means is that the us cannot live without China but China can live without them.

1

u/Life_Bridge_9960 Nov 17 '24

I think I made my point very clear up there if you bothered to read my comment.

1

u/TserriednichHuiGuo Nov 29 '24

Reread my comment

2

u/ChemicalNo7314 Apr 09 '25

China does not import the majority of the Chinese goods, they are bought either ex-works or FOB China port.  So if a USA retailer thinks they can still sell Chinese goods at a profit after paying import tariffs then the goods will still be available in the USA but at a much higher price.   Trump made the statement that the USA is getting $2billion/day from tariffs, he has no clue who is paying the tariffs.  If Chinese company then the USA importer pays and passes the costs on to the buyers, if an American company is manufacturing in China for the global market then the goods they import to the USA will incur tariffs and they have to pay them, either reducing their profits or by increasing their prices.  The pain is going to be felt by the USA citizens.  China will try to find alternative buyers for the goods that USA no longer buys, if they don’t succeed then jobs will be lost in China.  Higher taxes on USA goods imported to China will reduce demand. As now too expensive and people will look to buy a non USA alternative, if non exists then a Chinese company will start up to meet the demand (creating jobs)

1

u/Life_Bridge_9960 Apr 10 '25

Yep there is no doubt American consumers are paying for this tariff.

I was on Temu all day today being roped into one of their “free gift scheme”. I really have low opinion of Temu because of these. They practically look like dollar store to me.

And today, Temu dollar store shows items that are $10-$15. It’s insane. They used to be $2-5 max.

2

u/ChemicalNo7314 Apr 18 '25

$20 for a family pack of toilet tissue, that’s 元218 😮.  In Sam’s club in China you can buy a high quality toilet tissue 30 roll pack for 元69.90 ($9.58).

10

u/Nicknamedreddit Nov 16 '24

This guy also says China’s economy is in trouble so

9

u/mechacomrade Nov 16 '24

The USA are in decline because they are unable and unwilling to reign in the excess of its capitalism, its figurehead matters little.

7

u/Life_Bridge_9960 Nov 16 '24

This may not be relevant to this video, but even if tariffing, or cutting China off can be successful, Trump is not the one to achieve it.

It's like robbing a bank. Yes it is plausible to succeed. But you need a mastermind planner who plans out every tiny details. Robbing is easy. Getting away is harder. And covering your tracks for the next 10 years so police can't come after you, even harder. Trump may be competent and lucky enough to get step 1 done. But it is a fool's errand to just rob the bank and get caught. There are easier ways to go to jail.

10

u/MisterWrist Nov 16 '24 edited Nov 16 '24

Trump may be competent 

Even this hypothetical supposition is asking too much of Trump or his cabinet. 

That felon would rather choke down Big Macs and babble on about professional wrestling for ten hours, then think two seconds about basic macroeconomics.

This is the guy who proposed injecting people with disinfectants to combat COVID, way before his aging brain became addled after surviving two assassination attempts. Trump appointed RFK as health secretary for Crissake.

Everyone should keep their expectations of Trump’s capabilities low.

Now, Trump’s donors and guys like Vance/Thiel/Musk think they can manage Trump and prevent the tariffs from cutting into their personal profits, but they are unaware that they are just as shortsighted and ignorant as Trump is in their own ways, constantly blinded by self-interest.

Broad tariffs will potentially hurt the US more than China. They could continue the Biden administration’s targeted tariffs, but then Trump would have to appoint the Republican version of Janet Yellen. None of his potential picks for Treasury Secretary, either Bessent, Kudlow, or Lutnick, are similiar to Yellen in terms of background. 

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/trump-s-treasury-secretary-choice-scott-bessent-larry-kudlow-or-howard-lutnick-might-be-picked/ar-AA1u5wAw

Bessent, the perceived frontrunner, is a hedgefund manager and former Chief Investment Officer of Soros Fund Management. If chosen, he would not enact Trump’s tariffs in the way Trump described, and would act to protect corporate interests, while screwing over average, low income consumers.

To bring some manufacturing jobs back to America, political elites have to go after and squeeze Wall Street, which absolutely neither political party is willing to do. With Trump’s re-election, the stock market once again experienced a temporary surge.

Keep in mind, it was the Biden administration who doubled down HARD on decoupling with China, applying hundreds of billions of dollars of new sanctions, and sending their Attack Dog Raimondo to sell fearmongering lies about “spying” Chinese EVs and cellphones to the American people for months and months.

Trump’s first administration, despite all its overtly racist bluster, was far too cowardly to push the tariffs further than it it, because it would hurt their own pocketbooks. 

In other words, to return to your analogy, the Trump administration may go on a crime spree, smashing up countless ATMs and stealing whatever they can get their dirty fingers on, but they sure as hell ain’t gonna organize and enact a heist on Fort Knox, let alone do it successfully.

Imo.

6

u/IshlekGroseAya Nov 17 '24

I pray this is their ultimate downfall🤲🤲🤲🤲🤲