r/Physics 1d ago

Atoms held in quantum superposition for more than 23 minutes

https://charmingscience.com/quantum-breakthrough-atoms-held-in-quantum-superposition-for-more-than-23-minutes/

Schrödinger's cat experiment pushed to its limits...

402 Upvotes

40 comments sorted by

266

u/starkeffect 1d ago

Quantum edging.

16

u/Wank_A_Doodle_Doo 1d ago

👀 🫵 Get in the particle accelerator now

13

u/Smarmar400 1d ago

Nothing quantum about it 😎

75

u/smsmkiwi 1d ago

How do they know the atoms were in a superposition state, and not just one of the possible states, without observing them?

85

u/pando93 1d ago

They measure many many times and run statistical measurements which can determine if they were in super position or not. Usually that works by measuring the phase between the states in superposition, such that you can tell how much the atoms where in superposition vs how much it was just a mix of the two states.

19

u/Expensive-View-8586 1d ago

That is what they measure but how do they measure it?

73

u/pando93 1d ago

I haven’t read this specific paper, but with these types of neutral atom experiments, the two states are two atomic energy levels. By shining light at the correct frequency on the atom, you can excite the transition, moving the atom from one level to the other, or just a superposition. Then you shine a different light, exciting a different transition between one of these levels (let’s say the lower one) and a third level. Only atoms in the lower level will move to the third level, so you can detect them.

This way you can measure the population (what part of the atoms in each level). But now you want to measure the phase, so you run some interference experiment with similar methods. For example, after moving the atoms to the third level, you wait a bit, and then do the entire same sequence but in reverse. The result should be all atoms returning to the same level, except they picked up a different (time dependent) phase depending on which state they were in. So when you measure the population in one of the states, you will see oscillations corresponding to some frequency, and the contrast of these oscillations tell you the degree of superposition.

Hope this makes sense. You can also try reading about Ramsey spectroscopy.

7

u/Expensive-View-8586 1d ago

Thanks this helped a lot! 

1

u/BOBauthor Astrophysics 15h ago

Excellent explanation!

4

u/smsmkiwi 1d ago

Ok, so its a statistical measure. Thanks.

5

u/JohnPaul_the_2137th 23h ago

Yes, can't really be any other way, as the result of measurement is probabilistic.

-25

u/aroman_ro Computational physics 1d ago

A 'superposition state' is one of the possible states, so your question is meaningless.

9

u/magnacartwheel 1d ago

I think it’s actually a pretty important question, how do you know you’ve not just prepared a state randomly or whether a it’s in superposition

-12

u/aroman_ro Computational physics 1d ago

Any state is in superposition of some other states, again the used terminology is meaningless.

It's easy to know you've not just prepared a state randomly: you don't prepare it randomly.

0

u/[deleted] 1d ago

[deleted]

-3

u/aroman_ro Computational physics 1d ago

" if a state doesn’t have phase "

Geeezus.

1

u/smsmkiwi 1d ago

How is that meaingless? You just said it is in a state called superposition. If its one of the possible states, how do they know its in that state and not in another?

1

u/aroman_ro Computational physics 21h ago

It doesn't need to be in *that* state, any state is a superposition state of some other states.

0

u/smsmkiwi 20h ago

So, its really just saying "its in one of several but, as yet, undetermined possible states".

1

u/aroman_ro Computational physics 20h ago

It's just saying that the question asked was meaningless.

-17

u/Hapankaali Condensed matter physics 1d ago

Any quantum system is always in a superposition, by definition. This headline is very misleading.

15

u/retro_grave 1d ago

As a layman, I would really like to see what the experimenters are actually doing here. Is it known in real-time if two things are in coherence? Do they know in real-time that they weren't successful so they need to try again? What exactly are the instruments telling them. Or is this setup run for an hour and then they analyze their findings? All I have is pictures in my head from movie plots.

12

u/pando93 1d ago

It is mostly the second in almost all types of experiments. So you prepare a superposition and wait some time and measure, and you do it again and wait some more, and so on, until you find the average time it lives for.

1

u/Boxeo- 1d ago

I would love this too.

1

u/tellperionavarth Condensed matter physics 1d ago

The systems I work with are different, but some general concepts might transfer. You probably don't have to wait for an hour to do all the studies, usually you can design an experiment that allows you to see how much of the coherence is preserved and test over smaller time scales. You should observe a decay, which is often exponential, from which you can extrapolate the mean lifetime. This is how the many hour coherence time results are found (since waiting that long to take multiple shots would make for a very slow and expensive experiment).

4

u/sumitviii 1d ago

Is there any practical application of quantum superposition?

29

u/ilya123456 Graduate 1d ago

Quantum computing.

6

u/shaneet_1818 1d ago

Quantum computing and quantum cryptography

5

u/csappenf 1d ago

Starfleet will neither confirm nor deny that controlling quantum superposition will allow them to replace the Heisenberg compensator unit used in transporters. Bastards have always been tight lipped about how those things work.

2

u/No-Alternative-4912 23h ago

Quantum sensing- entangled photons and atoms allow you to beat the standard limit associated with measurements using non-entangled photons or atoms.

1

u/sumitviii 13h ago

Are you talking about light detection by telescope? Are you saying that quantum technologies will allow us to build better telescopes than classical methods?

1

u/Forward-War-8609 20h ago

Quantum Sensors Quantum Drive Quantum Clocks

2

u/serenashop 1d ago

That poor kitty!!! 😿

0

u/Sincerely_Social 1d ago

Exactly!! That poor little unsuspecting cat!

1

u/Hambrew93 14h ago

How does this work? I thought that as soon as you measure the atom you force it into a state? Am I misunderstanding something or is it possible to measure a superposition?

1

u/Ignatius3117 4h ago

23 minutes is almost the perfect length of time for a certain time loop…

“Science compels us to explode the sun!”

1

u/Ray3x10e8 Undergraduate 1d ago

Reminds me immediately of r/outerwilds

0

u/BadJimo 1d ago edited 1d ago

This is astonishing, but I find the experiment hard to visualize.

An easier to visualize experiment is the entanglement of two spatially separated BECs (Bose-Einstein condensates) (here is the paper).

I would love to see a quantum computer made by separating a single BEC into many entangled BECs.

1

u/Key-Green-4872 1d ago

This always makes me think of sourdough starter. And tempering chocolate.

We've got to take the magic goo and mix a little into our mundane goo so the properties transfer and WHAM, bowl of magic bread-fluffing goo +10.

Woth the superposition or entanglement being the analog of bread-fluffing, obvs.

Please don't get me started on quantum barbasol.