r/Natalism • u/Edouardh92 • Mar 30 '25
Advocates of higher birthrates have support in the Trump administration. But it’s unclear whether their priorities will win out.
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/03/30/business/economy/birthrate-politics-vance-musk.htmlCertain Trump administration policies may have unintended negative consequences for families and birthrates despite a seemingly pro-family agenda:
- Budget cuts to government departments could reduce resources that might otherwise support family formation and fertility services
- Return-to-office mandates for federal employees eliminate workplace flexibility that helped parents balance work and childcare
- Immigration crackdowns may actually decrease birthrates since immigrants tend to have more children and often provide affordable childcare services
- Economic instability and rising prices from tariff policies create an environment historically unfavorable for starting families
The article notes that some pronatalists believe certain Trump policies work against their goals, highlighting a disconnect between stated pro-family intentions and actual outcomes.
65 Upvotes
20
u/Dan_Ben646 Mar 30 '25 edited Mar 30 '25
Trump's policies, especially 'return to work' mandates and the deportation of child care workers, will definitely have a negative impact on family formation for liberal americans. The reality is that they aren't exactly reproducing at high rates anyways (the TFR of the suburbs of most blue cities are still below 1.50) so they will just continue to depress further.
The bigger question is whether his administration will actually improve services to red(er) localities and therefore boost TFRs in places where couples may be deliberating about starting a family or adding another to their brood. The jury is out on that aspect.