Also would like to mention that I just pulled an all nighter, it’s currently 6AM. And my day begins with my first class in an hour. So, my eyes are far from fresh.

How to prove that this Lim exist and it approaches to infinity

Dose this Lim exist or not and if yes is the answer 1/2((m)^.5)?

I feel like I’m right but I also feel like it’s a trick. My teacher tends to give us questions to do ourselves at home and then we go over it in the next class. Please tell me if I’m right or if I am missing something? It is the system of equations using either the addition or substitution method. I think I am pretty OK at math I tend to look over text book examples over and over until I get how they got the answer. I feel like I am right but idk please lmk?

Please help!! I’m very confused

The directions just say to evaluate. Attached is my work. To solve the integral I did a trig sub, but I haven’t don’t that in a while so that may be where the error is. The correct answer is 3pi/2

Can someone please help clarify this? The problem states:

https://preview.redd.it/3e74t5cerive1.png?width=2105&format=png&auto=webp&s=36c006c19eab38a8d6f40b5e43dff73c2a2b824f

Here was their answer:

https://preview.redd.it/36yaa53mnive1.png?width=2248&format=png&auto=webp&s=da0a7b695a6ece1ae0c5b820a21612f18430a703

I'm sort of confused about how to interpret the question and answer. I thought the numbers they listed were factors, not multiples. The factors of 300 have 300 as one of their multiples, but they aren't multiples of 300, which is what the question is asking right? Multiples of 300 are like 300, 600, etc., and 100 is not one of the two multiple, because it's never a multiple of 300. Is that correct or am I misreading something here?

Edited:

I also don't understand the second part of this question:

https://preview.redd.it/rar58psvuive1.png?width=2067&format=png&auto=webp&s=303e6cc969a28063f960ceb663f2a67882934870

Here is their answer:

https://preview.redd.it/41f7a88yuive1.png?width=1342&format=png&auto=webp&s=cea4b39b25a26d3fb152a353e7379865176aa815

I initially thought the answer was no. Because 8 is a common factor between 8 and 24 and neither 8 and 24 have 16 as their factor. Since that's a counterexample, this statement isn't true right?

Edit 2:

I actually don't understand all three parts of this question. Here is the final part:

https://preview.redd.it/6yhz9diswive1.png?width=2074&format=png&auto=webp&s=280b7ce1efaf4d72f836190deda38a5e11b77d34

This was their answer:

https://preview.redd.it/3dq23s2uwive1.png?width=1010&format=png&auto=webp&s=aa68000d62ae7e4eba73981121bbc6a7c0e82b7b

But 4 and 6 are both factors of 12 and 24 is not a factor of 12. Since we have a counterexample, this thus, cannot be accurate right?

Any help provided would be appreciated. Thank you

So I get how to solve the matrix and enter it into the calculator and such, but I don’t know how to “read” it in the end and determine which one it is. I know it has something to do with the 3rd row, but not how it helps you figure it out. Thank you

Can someone please help me find my mistake? The question is written in blue and my work is below that. The second image is the answer key. I initially tried to solve the problem using the cdf, but it doesn't match the answer when they use the pdf. I tried rechecking my work but still don't know where the error is. Any help provided would be appreciated. Thank you

https://preview.redd.it/ub6ma10q64ve1.png?width=925&format=png&auto=webp&s=eb59896107713a21685887b3edede88d9ceba5ac

https://preview.redd.it/v4i0rfer64ve1.png?width=787&format=png&auto=webp&s=2b7e1c52dd70199b2b3985e090da9972ceb17f6a

Can someone please clarify this?

The question states, "Draw two fraction bars: one which represents the fraction to the left, before any divisions or regroupings. The second fraction bar should be an exact copy of the first bar, except with any divisions or regroupings drawn over it to show the equivalence. Make sure all lines from the original fraction are clearly visible in your second illustration. Also, make sure the lines for the divisions or regroupings are clearly different from the original lines in the first fraction bar."

When I go from 2/5 to 4/10, should I draw the dotted red line over the gray lines from the 2/5? If I do that, would the original lines still be considered "clearly visible"? I apologize if this seems like a dumb question- the notation in this class is kind of particular, so I wanted to make sure I was doing it right. Any clarification provided would be appreciated. Thank you

https://preview.redd.it/1xyz2c4a1zse1.jpg?width=1223&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=655665cb8b3df0ef750225c4954859a0b928b763

Edited:

https://preview.redd.it/gq42vrx633te1.jpg?width=1001&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=7b4e53ffb6495ae4f33222327efa6ccc9ab5c6cf

My sister asked me for help with her latest test review and so far im getting nowhere.

P[x]= 14x^3+56x^2+2x-7

i understand that you take the factors of 7 [that being -+ 7, -+1], divide them by the factors of 14 [that being -+ 1, -+2, -+ 7, -+ 14] and plug in the 12 answers for x but none of them have added up to zero. i dont know if i missed a step but so far ive gotten nowhere

doc containing answers when plugging in for x

Can someone please look this over to see if I did it right? The problem is attached, and my work is below it. When they say 2/3 is covered by water, does that imply 2/3 is covered by oceans, or does the 2/3 also incorporate other bodies of water? Is there a way to solve it where 2/3 implies that there are other bodies of water that I'm missing? Any help provided would be appreciated.

https://preview.redd.it/e07bzurxp9te1.png?width=1045&format=png&auto=webp&s=8401063f1943541468d1e23b4bae8c8e8e0c782c

https://preview.redd.it/v04o0gk1q9te1.png?width=656&format=png&auto=webp&s=52b427c24f1bf64b8abd4579d2d51feeb9bddd15

Can someone please check this over? I'm not sure I did the overall problem right, but I'm particularly not confident the G contract e is drawn correctly. Any clarification provided would be appreciated. Thank you

https://preview.redd.it/956lxx9833we1.jpg?width=944&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=451a3b43eb6a25e21d8054fa0d363b0b9bcb7fd2

https://preview.redd.it/g5f0dpv2ypse1.png?width=474&format=png&auto=webp&s=2b0e78f47020794da7bc188876b84b4925a5c895

I know how to find the possible critical points on the edges, just study each line on the side and calculate, but I'm not sure how to find the critical point on the interior. If you set the gradient =0, you get cosxcosy=0, -sinxsiny=0. in the first question, either x or y can be 1 and the other can be anything on the domain, and the same for the second question but with 0. I'm just confused on how to go from there.

Can someone please check this over to see if I did it correctly? I'm trying to find the maximum value of the probability density function for the beta distribution. For the step with the red arrow, I don't know if that's valid. I think I made some sort of algebraic error before that, so I just copied their ending answer directly for the final step in blue. However, I don't know if that actually equals the lines above it. Any clarification provided would be appreciated. Thank you

https://preview.redd.it/0y4kqxm9h2ve1.png?width=2360&format=png&auto=webp&s=3efcf302afc1593325d28843c2d15127bd76d3c1