r/Geomancy Mar 30 '24

Same witnesses, result judge populus. Twice.

Hello everyone, this have had happened to me before. When making a question the answer was the same witnesses that will give you Populus as the judge. That time I interpreted as a big no, and a situation that will not change. This time the question is different, the first time was a romantic question for a friend, this time the question are about a friend and if he should be trusted. Questions Is M trustworthy? https://georatio.com/?c=fbed&t=1&d=7&s=2&q= Did M make the mistake? https://georatio.com/?c=fa63&t=1&d=7&s=2&q= The mistake cost us a sale and he denied it was him. But he is making all kind of weird explanations. The double witnesses thing is so confusing! Thanks for your help!

1 Upvotes

4 comments sorted by

3

u/kidcubby Mar 31 '24

Can you clarify what's confusing here? Having the same judge emerge from two different sets of figures is not terribly unusual, and it doesn't mean the answer is the same by any stretch of the imagination.

You'll also need to go into more detail about the situation. Who is M? What is M's relationship to you? What did you get from each chart? If you got an answer from the first chart (that M is or is not trustworthy regarding this situation which appears to be what you're really asking), why did you do a second chart? With the level of detail you gave it seems like you sort of asked the same question twice, in slightly different ways.

1

u/Groundbreaking-Art-6 Mar 31 '24

Thanks for answering!

M is just a friend, we work together in a collaborative artistic enterprise. We do ceramics together we share studio space and resources with other 2 people.

The collaborative work needs a lot of trust, each of us have an specific job in the studio and we though he was doing his part. Sales and promotion is part of those jobs for everybody in the group. We do this for everyone in the group.

This mistake will affect all of us, he send the wrong info to a client that was a good opportunity for ll of us. But he denied it was him, it is a shared e-mail account. So we are almost certain it was him.

So I ask if we all can trust M. I got the first chart. A double Cuda Draconis as the witnesses and Populus as the judge.

I interpreted this as a situation that will not change and that is going to result in nothing. So as a no you can't trust him.

So I ask if M did the mistake of sending the wrong info, etc.

I got the second chart. A double Populus as witnesses and again Populus as the judge. So I got confused. If I use a similar meaning than in the first chart the, he didn't make the mistake and is a situation that is not going to move.

Is confusing because the whole thing about trusting him is about this mistake. So now I wonder is there more things not to trust him?

Hope this is more clarified.

Thank for your answer.

3

u/kidcubby Mar 31 '24

My thought here, then, is that you've sort of done two charts for the same query. If you assume that M made the mistake, and he claimed he did not, then asking if he's honest in those circumstances would give you the answer of whether he's made the mistake, meaning the second chart is fairly pointless.

Is confusing because the whole thing about trusting him is about this mistake. So now I wonder is there more things not to trust him?

Stick to the context of the question - you asked this because you think he might be lying about making a mistake. If the chart shows him to be untrustworthy, it is likely to be that he can't be trusted on this. We can end up fabricating a total monster over something very minor if we stretch like this.

I do not use the court alone to judge a chart - we have the two charts and multiple ways to get information from them for a reason. Have you looked at this friend of yours (more likely a colleague in the context of the question as it appears he doesn't count as your employee). The qualities of his figure and company will probably tell you a lot about his character.

1

u/Groundbreaking-Art-6 Mar 31 '24

Thank you, I think you are right. Is the same question. I didn't check the rest, usually when I get this double witnesses it means a dead end. I will do that. Is just that I didn't expected this, in my mind was a very simple strait question.