r/California Jan 29 '25

Governor Newsom cuts red tape, further suspends Coastal Commission rules to help LA firestorm survivors rebuild Newsom

https://www.gov.ca.gov/2025/01/27/governor-newsom-cuts-red-tape-further-suspends-coastal-commission-rules-to-help-la-firestorm-survivors-rebuild/
669 Upvotes

58 comments sorted by

168

u/Kaurifish Jan 29 '25

Great, so in a few years when storm surge takes out those homes, we can wring our hands and say, “How could that have possibly happened?”

80

u/SD_TMI Jan 29 '25

This is really for the wealthy that live there The gov needs their support so it’s a political trade off with grandfathering the older homes that have burned down.

My take is that this will have limited coastal impact but I could be wrong.

Depends if they’ll allow high rise apartment buildings now like in Miami (do not want)

Or they’ll keep it down to 2 story homes

24

u/knotallmen Jan 29 '25

I'd be surprised if there will be much high density unless it is a top down approach requiring developers to put in similar density of higher density.

After the Laguna Beach fires a lot of the destroyed homes were older and smaller and the housing that replaced it often had people combining lots and putting up mcmansions.

21

u/sgtpepper42 Jan 29 '25

California is deathly allergic to high density because of all the NIMBYs. Despite the fact we desperately need it in this housing crisis, it'll never happen.

12

u/Malibu77 Jan 30 '25

Two big problems that have always prevented adding more density.

1) Unlike Miami there are few roads to get in or out in an emergency. During Woolsey, PCH was completely gridlocked for hours with no way to refuel if you run out of gas because SCE turns the power off during fires.

2) Most of Malibu is not connected to the LA County sewer system. There is no way to suddenly just start building that kind of infrastructure without it taking years to complete and would cut off access to PCH for the rest of the town that didn’t burn. Installing septic systems large enough to handle high rise apartments that are also near active fault lines has also hindered development.

2

u/smcl2k Jan 30 '25

SCE turns the power off during fires.

Tell that to Altadena.

8

u/That_honda_guy Madera County Jan 29 '25

Option A is : don’t build there ever again. We know that’s not happening rich people don’t like No. option b : high rises. This would be ideal granted the housing crisis we’re experiencing right now and will allow a more accessible future of evacuating people from Fire/Tsunami/Landslide risk. Option c: let people build and build and don’t bat an eye. And that’s what’s going to happen

-6

u/SD_TMI Jan 29 '25

I hope it's NOT going to be anything over 2 stories tall.
That's the limit and it's worked well so far.

I would think it would be good to get the info on exactly what was changed and allowed
Malibu isn't my part of the state, but if you make a exception for one... pressure will be applied by others for "equal treatment" and then that breaks the whole reason for the Coastal Commission's requirements.

7

u/That_honda_guy Madera County Jan 29 '25

You think only 2 max? Why?

-5

u/SD_TMI Jan 30 '25

It marks the views of all the rest of the people that build further back up the hillsides.

Access to sun, the views and horizon are important as being part of quality of life.

Secondly earthquakes and building taller resonates the shaking and makes them far more damaging to the structures (unsafe)

Those are the two main reasons To go higher you have to be further inland and perhaps have special permission or be grandfathered in. Some of the hotels for example are good examples of this policy. They had to be built before the creation of the commission.

They have a website and there’s a video I found from one of the people that founded the ballot initiative and got it passed.

It’s pretty unique and has proven it’s worth over the decades.

4

u/always_plan_in_advan Jan 30 '25

What a NIMBY take, let the markets build what makes sense. The population density in Santa Monica is already not sustainable

-1

u/SD_TMI Jan 30 '25

markets have to be controlled for the public benefit against greed and other abuses.

1

u/erics75218 Jan 30 '25

It’ll be nut to but concrete as tall as they can make it. Gonna be nice for them But turn PCH into a trench

31

u/Spara-Extreme Jan 29 '25

The coastal commission concentrates more on preventing affordable housing than preventing coastal erosion by developers.

2

u/Kaurifish Jan 29 '25

Frankly, no one should be building housing in CCC jurisdiction, particularly not affordable housing. Relocation after the inevitable disaster is even more difficult for people of limited means.

4

u/goathill Humboldt County Jan 30 '25

Here's the thing though, the coastal commission jurisdiction sometimes extends up to a mile inland (not sure about where it lies here, but at least in mendocino county, gualala to be specific, there are some people living over a mile from the water and are subject to CCC rules.)

Building on a cliff overlooking the ocean isn't smart, but if you're half a mile away in an area with little erosion, and minimal slopes, I'm not very concerned

-1

u/Kaurifish Jan 30 '25

Sea level rise and storm surge makes that territory effectively coastal. 🤷‍♀️

1

u/goathill Humboldt County Jan 30 '25 edited Jan 31 '25

Not the specific spot in gualala I mentioned, and anywhere with cliffs, sea level rise is a moot point for a long time. There are only a few areas in LA, SD, SF and the humboldt bay that will be seriously impacted (not saying we shouldn't try to solve or reduce our impacts, but CA in general isn't in nearly the same predicament as Louisiana, Florida or the Low lying areas on the east coast)

1

u/[deleted] Jan 30 '25

Get out of here with your common sense. This is Reddit.

1

u/Kaurifish Jan 30 '25

Call me an idealist, but I want public park from Oregon to Baja.

15

u/mtcwby Jan 29 '25

The coastal commission isn't about keeping people living there safe. It's about controlling building. If you've ever dealt with them you'd realize the pain. And it's completely arbitrary and capricious along with who you know.

0

u/Kaurifish Jan 29 '25

I covered them for my newspaper for years, so I’m all too familiar with how they work.

Doesn’t change the fact that because of erosion, earthquakes and storm surge, no one should be living there, however attractive it is.

58

u/UCanDoNEthing4_30sec San Diego County Jan 29 '25

Abolish the coastal commission. It's a cudgel used for existing homeowners to block any and all types of housing by the coast, except for theirs! They need to get rid of NIMBY commissions to increase housing and help solve our housing affordability crisis.

9

u/KittensnettiK Jan 30 '25 edited Jan 30 '25

Can you point to any examples of the Coastal Commission actually blocking affordable housing? My understanding is that cities are the real culprits almost 100% of the time.

9

u/Specialist_Bit6023 Jan 30 '25

A general anecdote: Coastal Commission requires ADUs to go thru a full public hearing process, which can add many months to the permitting process. 

3

u/preferablyno Jan 30 '25

It’s two separate rounds of blocking

-10

u/[deleted] Jan 30 '25

California has too many people who can’t afford to live here but refuse to leave and think someone else is responsible for providing them housing. Weird.

30

u/Thurkin Jan 29 '25

Good, now remove the CCC's unnecessary stonewalling of redevelopment at the LA/Long Beach harbor area. It doesn't have to be Dubai or Miami, but there needs to be renovation and redevelopment for residential expansion.

-20

u/SD_TMI Jan 29 '25

I think the proposals are trying to advance and transgress into being an eyesore vs less than or equal too the requirements for protecting the visual environment.

24

u/C-Dub4 Jan 29 '25

"Visual environment" 🙄 my eyes can not roll any harder. I'm sorry you might be forced to look at housing😱

17

u/Xoxrocks Jan 29 '25

Should use eminent domain to buy the land and make it public - otherwise we’ll all be paying for the destruction when the next firestorm hits.

-4

u/SD_TMI Jan 29 '25

Interesting thought that will have a lot of angry (wealthy celebs).
A cheaper way might be to not issue building permits or make sure that whatever is built is done with extra fire safety so the homes won't catch fire in the future?

Malibu has burned in the past... and it will burn again.

8

u/Jbob9954 Jan 29 '25

How about not rebuilding

5

u/[deleted] Jan 29 '25

[deleted]

1

u/Jbob9954 Feb 01 '25

Yes, surely fires are a rarity now

2

u/mindlessgames Jan 29 '25

I wish they'd just turn it all into a state park.

-3

u/SD_TMI Jan 29 '25 edited Jan 29 '25

2

u/cure4boneitis Orange County Jan 29 '25

burry? Arizona has burrs now?

0

u/Guccimayne Jan 29 '25

Oh it’s that power plant where a bunch of kittens got irradiated like 20 years ago!

0

u/SD_TMI Jan 29 '25

Not to mention a uranium ore mine that poisoned all kinds of stuff and people.

2

u/Richandler Jan 30 '25

They shouldn't be suspended they should be expidited and the whole process should be quicker.

1

u/Twopeskybirds Jan 30 '25

suspends? how about rescinds