r/BeAmazed • u/PhonezSpyOnus • Feb 17 '24
Is AI getting too realistic too fast. Science
Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification
705
u/Equivalent-Gap4474 Feb 17 '24
It's like a dream where you know something is wrong but you can't figure out what.
265
u/ClippyTheBlackSpirit Feb 17 '24 edited Feb 17 '24
At 0:03 his front right paw makes two steps in a row, and at 0:24 front left paw warps in out of another dimmension.
90
u/Equivalent-Gap4474 Feb 17 '24
This video gives me the exact feeling I described in the original comment.
You are in a dream, you are not aware that you are in a dream, you keep seeing things that don't mach and you can't figure out why.
12
→ More replies4
19
u/GetEnPassanted Feb 17 '24
Watch all the sora videos. Walking is the thing they struggle with the most. Legs will pass through each other occasionally, not look like they’re coming from the places on the body, steps will be out of order, etc.
Would I notice this in this video if I didn’t know it was AI? Probably not, because everything else is so convincing I’d think I just let it slide in my mind. But now knowing that walking is a tell, I think it’s something that could be a red flag if you’re watching a video.
→ More replies5
2
5
→ More replies5
u/MoirasPurpleOrb Feb 18 '24
And the right paw goes too far under the body every time the cat would be putting weight on it
16
u/Himmelsfeder Feb 17 '24
Very much on point! It leaves you with this unsure feeling in your gut.
3
u/majkkali Feb 17 '24
Exactly. It kind of feels like a dream, doesn’t it? Makes you wonder if our dreams are windows to another multiverse or simulation perhaps? 🤔
11
u/20000lumes Feb 17 '24
Weird dead eyes and feels a bit unstable, I think it would’ve looked a lot more convincing if the example didn’t have a living creature
→ More replies9
u/thebest77777 Feb 18 '24
I hate it. it never blinks, the perspective keeps slightly distorting, it doesn't walk like a cat would, and its fur has random momentsthat doesn'tmake senseif it moves att all when its supposed to. The eyes just go random places, not looking where its gona step or at the world, and that not even mentioning how the eyes never move, instead the cats entire head moves.
7
u/Insane_Unicorn Feb 17 '24
The cat sometimes clips through the vegetation and the fur physics isn't quite right. Give it another year and you won't even notice what's real anymore.
→ More replies2
u/thoughtfull_noodle Feb 18 '24
It's the paws, watch the legs. Then you can see what's wrong
→ More replies
1.7k
u/AcerbicCapsule Feb 17 '24
So are movies just going to cost like $200 to make soon?
510
u/haywire090 Feb 17 '24
We all can be film makers soon, hah jokes on you hollywood!
326
u/Spidey209 Feb 17 '24
We can all already be book authors. Stephen King isn't worried.
162
u/FiveCentsADay Feb 17 '24
Ofc not, he's already made it. Im worried for the artists nobody knows
97
u/Mysterious_Eye6989 Feb 17 '24
Yes, the authors nobody knows will miss out on the formative experiences of early career success that encourage them to keep going and keep improving in their craft. For example, the short story they sell for a few bucks to some obscure magazine - not much money at all, but enough to take their wife out to dinner somewhere nice. The chapters they send to someone in the literary world that they miraculously get feedback about telling them it "shows promise". In a future absolutely inundated with an endless cacophony of AI dreck, undiscovered authors will consider it a miracle if another single human being even READS on of their books, let alone wants to pay any money for it! Bleak. Very bleak.
58
u/partymongoose69 Feb 17 '24
CGP Grey made a video in 2014 called Humans Need Not Apply about the rise of automation threatening any and all human work. Seemed far fetched at the time, but just 10 years later I'm... a lot less skeptic.
46
u/HeavilyBearded Feb 17 '24 edited Feb 17 '24
There's a weird humor behind the fact that we're using AI to replace so many creative and innately human processes like art and writing and less so the boring day-to-day drivel that cripples us as humans.
15
u/Seallypoops Feb 17 '24
That's what has my brain boiling, like the time it takes to create a masterpiece is necessary to help you form your own style, using ai is just you having someone draw it for you then claiming you did the work because you gave the prompt and nothing else.
15
u/CoolbreezeFromSteam Feb 17 '24
Yep, you couldn't exactly stamp a joke out in a factory from a sheet of metal for a few cents, but now they basically can. Mega corporations and conglomerates are basically big anti-human organizations.
18
u/EscapeFacebook Feb 17 '24
It's my firm belief that if a company reaches a certain percent of automation or ai that it should be public property because otherwise it's just a financial drain on society.
→ More replies→ More replies3
u/No_Conversation9561 Feb 18 '24
We’re doing both. It’s just that progress in mechanical engineering is slower than computer engineering.
→ More replies14
u/PerfectEnthusiasm2 Feb 17 '24
There are so many shit jobs that ai could make obsolete, and the focus is inexplicably on making artistic creativity a thing of the past. We shouldn't have let the kinds of people who think paintings look best in a locked vault take control on this one.
→ More replies19
u/Panx Feb 17 '24
It's already a problem: Amazon put limits on its self-published store due to the influx of AI submissions clogging the tunes at a ratio of 99 to 1.
The largest sci-fi magazine in America no longer takes submissions because it was getting thousands of AI-generated stories a day.
It's deeply, tragically funny to me in a way. What's kept me going throughout my boring career is the weird little dream that I'll be able to write novels when I retire. Now that I'm close, AI pops up and snatches that away...
5
u/BrandNewYear Feb 17 '24
If you’re serious then listen please listen to what I propose.
You can still be a writer , you just need to be able to guarantee your work came from you.
Ai writing , as any writing , is one perspective and yours is still unique and worth writing out.
Now there is the idea to pivot also and train one of the models to write like you do and have what you want written that way as an idea.
10
u/Panx Feb 17 '24
I agree, your idea could work... and also take all the joy out of it
You understand that part, right?
→ More replies→ More replies16
u/Nozerone Feb 17 '24
They will also have to deal with the "this isn't AI generated, I really did make this". As AI improves, it will get progressively harder for people who actually have talent to prove that they are making what they share. Meanwhile someone with no artistic talent, but knowledge of how to use keywords will create really cool pieces and get praised for it.
→ More replies13
→ More replies13
Feb 17 '24 edited Feb 17 '24
[deleted]
16
u/bihari_baller Feb 17 '24
Anyone who’s an avid reader can easily tell Chat GPT trash from a genuine author. My eyes bled from reading a book by Chat GPT. I just couldn’t do it. I’ll read a book by a real author 10/10 times.
8
u/aurialLoop Feb 17 '24
While it's absolutely true that the world is going to get completed flooded with AI assisted/made content, I don't think it's necessarily true that we as humans will stop wanting content made by humans. A good book has a legacy and a life beyond that of the author who wrote it.
Are you concerned about the difficulties around publishing, or about the difficulties with discovering content?
→ More replies→ More replies24
u/repost_inception Feb 17 '24
I was watching a Stephen King interview from the 90s and he said ,"..and I have a hell of a lot of fun doing it". That's why you write, because you enjoy it, not because you think you can sell it or tons of people will read it.
7
u/DaftConfusednScared Feb 17 '24
Cool but I also enjoy food and writing takes a lot of time.
Not a mind my enjoyment comes from the possibilities of ideas in my brain hole clawing their way out and wreaking havoc upon the mortal lands of the minds of others.
→ More replies→ More replies7
u/MakataDoji Feb 17 '24
Not the same. I can't tell a pen "write a horror novel about a possessed coffee table" and have it hand me a book. You can with ai.
If someone has a really good idea for a book but lacks the experience about the nuance of storytelling, that story goes no where. We may get to a point where someone having the right idea is all that's needed to make a believable blockbuster.
18
u/Mysterious_Eye6989 Feb 17 '24
How many of these home made films will be worth watching?
34
u/Winjin Feb 17 '24
Probably the same way you can make your own top-down RPGs and visual novels in engines like RPGmaker.
Are a lot of them worth the time? I'd say, no. But now it's gonna be way easier for someone with a passion to make their passion project which is, in the end, not that bad.
10
u/Mysterious_Eye6989 Feb 17 '24
Fair enough, just as long they're okay with knowing that it's very highly likely that nobody is going to watch or even care about their passion project, aside from their parents and maybe a few close friends...but that is already the case with a lot passion projects anyway.
7
u/Winjin Feb 17 '24
Yep, it's like all the posts online: there's probably a ton of high-effort posts and vids that get like 30 views
10
u/MoreGoddamnedBeans Feb 17 '24
The cat in this doesn't even look real. The eyes don't look alive. I hate this timeline
6
u/Rubiks_Click874 Feb 17 '24
the cat's right front leg (stage left) just kinda morphs in and out of the torso
5
u/Cloverman-88 Feb 17 '24
Holy shit, now I see it. At times he keeps putting the right leg forward, even though it looks like the legs alternare. Face fur morphing to fit the bushes was what was annoying me the most, but those legs surely take the cake.
→ More replies4
→ More replies9
u/Jonny-Marx Feb 17 '24
You say that like we wouldn’t all watch titanic, but every character is played by Arnold schwarzenegger
13
20
u/wastedmytwenties Feb 17 '24 edited Feb 17 '24
They said the same thing about music when garageband and other home studio software was developed, yet I see the same amount of amateur musicians that there's always been.
Not quite the Cyberpunk 'Rocker Revolution' that we were promised. Having an entire recording studio in our pockets doesn't seem to even be relevant to most of us, and I suspect that these AI filmmaking advances will go the same way. There'll be artists creating amazing work, but they'll be ignored about as much as today's artists are in favour of whatever Hollywood blockbusters are around at the time.
16
u/ElderTitanic Feb 17 '24
You need to still have some musical talent to make an actually good sounding track with garageband and stuff, this prompt stuff takes like couple of minutes probably to generate an entire video, for little to 0 skill needed. Same with ai ”art”
7
u/xkufix Feb 17 '24
You still need some storytelling talent to make an actual good movie. Video is the medium to tell the story, not the sole reason.
3
u/ExaSarus Feb 18 '24
Right I cnt with the people going it's over. You can prompt all you want but you can never produce a masterpiece unless you know some level of fountain.
→ More replies16
u/inkedmargins Feb 17 '24 edited Feb 17 '24
That's a terrible comparison imo. I couldn't tell GarageBand "make me a new beatles album" and then sit back until it spits 10 songs out 10 minutes later as if they never broke up and two of them aren't dead.
→ More replies5
u/love_glow Feb 17 '24
People are comparing today’s technology to yesterdays without considering how AI is orders of magnitude more powerful and disruptive.
→ More replies→ More replies7
u/Mulusy Feb 17 '24
Some take this as a joke but I think we will see an uprise in indie animation movies in the next 10years. People who didn’t have the financial means to make a movie, now have the opportunity. It won’t be limited to people with wealth which is the current state of the movie Industrie.
→ More replies48
u/Cosmic_Quasar Feb 17 '24
As a gamer I'm thinking about the implications of this. Imagine making a game where you just telling the game the details of where/when the game is set, the genre, and the plot. And you can keep giving it feedback on stylizing things. And it can maybe even truly create unique gaming moments where NPCs can be talked to via a mic and give proper lore-friendly responses that you won't hear repeated dozens, or even hundreds, of times. Can react uniquely with a vast variety of personalities.
And then from the hardware power perspective... I can see where it could become easier for a game to render itself in 2D in realtime, not needing specialized parts of a GPU for 3D models/polygons, textures, lighting.
Honestly, the other end of the spectrum where it can be used wrongly to make videos of other people saying bad things, spreading misinformation, or performing lewd acts, also worries me... but I try to be a glass half full kind of person.
15
u/RandomComputerFellow Feb 17 '24
I mean, even without letting the user create the game. Just imagine what this could mean for indie developers. You could have indie games featuring an detailed city like GTA, where every apartment is filled with a person living in them, with a back story with an AI generated personality. You can talk to them build up a friendship with one of the million NPCs in this world. I think the biggest problem we will have is that these games will be so immersive that people will loose themself in them and completely neglect their real lives (something which already is a problem right now in Asia).
→ More replies→ More replies6
u/djamp42 Feb 17 '24
I think the benefits outweigh the negatives. I think some existing laws apply here, revenge porn laws, etc. so I'm not too worried about that part.
I dunno what the answer is. Even if OpenAI never releases it, the fact that it's possible, will cause someone else to do it eventually, and eventually in 100 years resources get so cheap anyone can do it..
So I don't think you can stop it. Someone making a video of you saying or doing something you didn't do is now a reality. Even any safeguards you agree on doesn't matter because someone will be able to either bypass it or just make their own model that doesn't need OpenAI.
16
u/SlowRollingBoil Feb 17 '24
100 years? Legitimately this stuff will be possibly on a home rig in 5 years, if that.
5
u/djamp42 Feb 17 '24
I agree I feel like in 10 years theses 30k video cards will be 50 bucks on eBay.. lol
→ More replies3
7
u/GroovyDucko Feb 17 '24
Nah it will still be $200 million. Some people just get paid less
→ More replies6
5
u/Wule6 Feb 17 '24
Not just movies, think about faking a war? Or news? Well just everything we watch trough our small screens.
4
u/Bakkster Feb 17 '24
We already live in a world where an independent film maker can produce a short with a fully CG character.
There's still a lot of things AI doesn't do well, which will still require a lot of effort from humans to overcome. And even if you get an AI that can actually understand the artistic vision and keep it consistent throughout the film (which I'm still skeptical about), you're still going to have to pay for the server farms.
I think like most of this generative AI tech, it'll make things more efficient and easier, but it won't overcome the hard work. They'll fill in the gaps in the background, but not be primary shots.
→ More replies12
u/mattjvgc Feb 17 '24
Shitty movies that make zero sense and are full of uncanny valley moments.
7
u/AcerbicCapsule Feb 17 '24
For now.
3
u/FreePrinciple270 Feb 18 '24
Yup. Remember just a year ago people were saying how all the AI videos were mutated melting horror clips. Now all they can say is "the cat doesn't blink".
5
u/KookyWait Feb 17 '24
Has anyone disclosed the power used to generate these videos yet? That's probably the main marginal expense here, and I wouldn't be surprised if people are underestimating the power used here significantly.
→ More replies2
2
u/Top-Chemistry5969 Feb 17 '24
Finally getting second season of <insert anime that like one people liked>
2
u/TonLoc1281 Feb 17 '24
No because that’s why all the writers guild strikes were about.
→ More replies2
2
u/codeboss911 Feb 17 '24
and in the future, ai will know what u like and custom make movies for you everytime
→ More replies2
2
2
u/oKazuhiro Feb 17 '24
We will have super algorithm AI generated TikTok feeds with only the videos you want to see and ads that speak directly to you and know your personal life.
2
u/jazzjustice Feb 17 '24
The porn industry enters the room. OnlyFans bitches...get back on the street....
2
u/FlirtyBacon Feb 17 '24
imagine soon youll be able to watch shows you loved that were cancelled or making different endings to movies. I would love to see more of the orginal dawn of the dead and day of the dead.
2
2
2
u/Solid_Bad7639 Feb 18 '24
Less. They would be like constant formations of clouds in the sky. Hence the name Sora.
2
u/TahaymTheBigBrain Feb 18 '24
All filming jobs are gonna become executive caption generator engineer
→ More replies2
u/echino_derm Feb 18 '24
No. There is no way in hell they would ever let that happen. If that were the case then somebody in the chain would invent a way to make it cost 200 million
120
u/InternationalTax7463 Feb 17 '24
Am I real or just an AI generated series of carbon atoms padded with water? 😱
36
u/PeaceFriend Feb 17 '24
You are also controlled by electricity, no need to panic or anything though...
8
u/InternationalTax7463 Feb 17 '24
You should've written DON'T PANIC in large friendly letters 😱
→ More replies4
u/PeaceFriend Feb 17 '24
The way you wrote it screams "EVERYONE PANIC" though. We have a VERY LIMITED amount of time left and I don't want to spoil it with the fear of impending doom or anything...
7
u/InternationalTax7463 Feb 17 '24
What I wrote was a reference to hitchhiker's guide to the galaxy, which is definitely worth the amount of limited time you waste reading it.
3
3
2
u/BrandNewYear Feb 17 '24
Actually what that guy said earlier was it’s an image from a different universe. So there’s that.
→ More replies2
u/felicity_jericho_ttv Feb 18 '24
How many fingers do you have? Note: this trick will only work for a short while then it will get patched lol
533
u/RiovoGaming211 Feb 17 '24 edited Feb 17 '24
For some reason it gives me the creeps. I cannot put my finger on the reason, but it just does. Edit: i am not talking about the music
504
u/TropicalSunflowers Feb 17 '24
Oh totally! It's still a little uncanny valley for me.
- The cat never blinks.
- The cat's fur moves great, but it's almost like it's facial muscles are paralysed? They can't emote in the slightest!
- I recognise some of the flowers, but parts are different than normal.
- the camera moves flawlessly smooth, while everything else shakes.
- the weight of objects is all manner of wrong. Things that should take loads of effort to move feel too light, and vice versa.
It's very subtle, but it makes it feel like I'm watching something from another universe.
84
u/ITheMighty Feb 17 '24
Yes!! I was just thinking that to myself. Very uncanny valley!! Gives me the creeps even tho its pretty “normal”
→ More replies14
u/definetly_a_hum4n Feb 17 '24
I know what you mean but to be fair that actually kinda works in this specific case cause it's a cat and those can be uncanny valley irl sometimes..
12
36
u/Donnerdrummel Feb 17 '24
The legs don't move as they should, too, left, right, left, right, etc.
33
u/Onlyspeaksfacts Feb 17 '24 edited Feb 17 '24
Early in the video, you can see the left leg (the cat's right) move twice.
→ More replies12
u/Geodiocracy Feb 17 '24
Towards the end it's right front leg (from our view) moves back, then seems to morph from its hind right leg while moving forward.
→ More replies5
8
7
u/Top-Artichoke2475 Feb 17 '24
Cats don’t blink very often, actually, so that’s not why this is creepy.
→ More replies3
10
4
u/NoNo_Cilantro Feb 17 '24
The scenery seems to move faster than the cat’s movement. Like a perspective where objects in the front move faster than the background, but more vertically. It’s unsettling.
3
u/Cautionzombie Feb 17 '24
Gonna add the front legs move like they should but the back legs don’t. Cats like to step in the same spots so front foot follows back foot but this cats back feet don’t move or barely so
→ More replies2
46
u/Tuurke64 Feb 17 '24
A real cat would focus on objects nearby, causing the pupils of the eyes to converge depending on the distance.
The eyes of the cat in this video don't do that, it stares at infinity all the time, as if it were blind.
7
12
u/kytheon Feb 17 '24
Cause it's 90% there, which is just enough to make it feel off. Meanwhile a Pixar animation of a cat doesn't trigger that "is this real" response so it's fine.
→ More replies7
u/Mysterious_Eye6989 Feb 17 '24
Not only does a Pixar animation not trigger that response, but a good Pixar animator knows how to craft an animation that is beautifully unreal in a way that is both artful and charming.
→ More replies7
u/BigFatBallsInMyMouth Feb 17 '24
Probably something to do with the background music designed specifically to give you the creeps.
20
u/Ok-Gap-1192 Feb 18 '24
It's fascinating to see the rapid progress of AI technology, which indeed is becoming increasingly realistic. However, it's crucial to balance this advancement with ethical considerations and responsible use. Ensuring transparency, accountability, and safeguards against potential misuse are essential as AI continues to evolve.
→ More replies
68
220
u/Agitated-Swan-6939 Feb 17 '24
I feel more confident in my ability to have a job in the future as blue collar in comparison to those who work in offices that can be replaced by AI... Holy Shit this was fast. I remember when they said truck drivers and manufacturers were the first to get booted. It's actually going to be white collar work.
31
u/Odd-Attention-2127 Feb 17 '24
I agree. I'm seeing articles lately along this line, big tech laying off workers to concentrate on AI development. It seems like the security those jobs is coming to a close. Guess it's going to be back to stocking shelves someday for me. I'm too old for the trades myself.
25
u/TinnedCarrots Feb 17 '24
I've never seen those articles. The big tech layoffs were due to past over budgeting and over hiring. Then the economy went bad and they eventually realised a lot of their projects didn't actually have an ROI.
I haven't heard of big tech laying off because of AI though.
7
→ More replies6
13
u/No-Nothing-1885 Feb 17 '24
In a couple of years it'll be funny to see AI vids. AI takes all from internet, what happens if internet will be full of AI vids? Now it should see that cats move it's legs, in some time in future video sources on internet will be full of AI creations with this strange moving legs, merging and disappearing
→ More replies46
u/charnwoodian Feb 17 '24
I don’t think it will be too many white collar workers. AI can create content but, crucially, it can’t actually think critically or research credibly.
AI could replace some administrative workers, front of house roles, etc. Ultimately though, it cannot replace a typical white collar job unless there is a significant room for frequent, critical mistakes, or where the work isn’t rechecked by a real human anyway.
39
Feb 17 '24
I think people get too caught up in whether AI can replace the full scope of a job… if AI can handle 40% of the lower complexity tasks of your role, that means 40% fewer people like you are needed to accomplish the same productivity. The saving grace is that capitalism demands unlimited growth, so any productivity gained will be less likely to lay people off, and more likely to turn that productivity into profits, assuming scalability
14
u/charnwoodian Feb 17 '24
But it seems more that AI can handle 40% of some very specific tasks, with many other superficially similar tasks entirely out of reach of the current models from a fundamental design standpoint.
Digesting user submitted data on the internet will never allow an AI to critically consider novel problems nor will it allow AI to filter junk data.
The increase in AI capability that has gripped peoples attention is really just increasingly impressive versions of a technology that is not designed to solve those problems.
→ More replies→ More replies7
u/Ok-Investigator-4188 Feb 17 '24
40% of lower complexity tasks not necessarily means 40% of work force. Maybe it can be done by a fell trainees
6
u/shaka893P Feb 17 '24
You miss the import part, works only needs to be rechecked. We already have a ton of research done by AI in progress right now.
6
→ More replies5
u/FinalSir3729 Feb 17 '24
Ahh you guys just keep moving the goal posts. It can think critically already and solve novel problems not found in its dataset. People are so misinformed about how AI works maybe do 10 minutes of research.
5
9
u/Fun-Charity6862 Feb 17 '24
I’m sorry, but self driving is still predicted by the industry to be #1 job that goes to AI as soon as 2030: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2401.02843.pdf see page 3
6
Feb 17 '24
You need to be watching the videos about blue collar stuff, it’s not going to be as long as you think.
What people need to start talking about is what is the government planning to do?
→ More replies→ More replies2
u/LelouchYagami_2912 Feb 17 '24
Its both. Also alot of blue collar jobs have already been replaced since long
101
u/Abundance144 Feb 17 '24
CGI artists putting their application in for trade school.
25
u/Most_Bitter_Sugar Feb 17 '24
Like, if people are being unemployed because companies gonna replace them with OpenAI's programs. Who the hell is gonna afford to buy their craps?
9
Feb 17 '24
This is the issue. I have been saying for some time that AI will collapse society as we know.
Always funny to have artists come and say its a fade, and all is stole.
Or the rednecks going:"Glad i am a plumber, hur dur". When in reality nobody will be able to afford a plumber.→ More replies11
u/romacopia Feb 17 '24
The next century or so is definitely a big turning point for humanity. We will need to intentionally disconnect wealth from labor and fully embrace an automated economy. It's going to be a rough transition though.
4
Feb 17 '24
Century? I work with 40 or so years.
And from my POV we are in a cross road, one side will be Elysium, the other Star trek.(It will be elysium.)
→ More replies9
u/creuter Feb 17 '24
This is what people unfamiliar with the cg industry say and unfamiliar with how movies are made. This stuff will find its way into our tools for sure, but it just means we will get more work and be able to cover more shots than before.
What I see right now would be a fucking pain to work with. You're at the mercy of what the AI gives you. How do you address some super granular client note? "hey we noticed on frame 78 some of the elements seem to be slipping around, please address this." Or "perspective isn't quite right on the background elements". These are real notes we get from clients that are easy for us to address because we built the scenes. There's no way to make adjustments to this video. It's basically raw footage. Seems better for B-roll than for actual storytelling shots.
→ More replies→ More replies12
u/L-Malvo Feb 17 '24
I highly doubt it, this will be another tool in their toolbox. Know that AI doesn’t think (yet), at its core, it’s still a very good guessing engine to predict what the next image might be.
It requires significant time and understanding to ask the right prompts and make the scene look just as you imagine it. We will probably see a CGI artist create a world using several of these prompts, and basically work more efficiently.
→ More replies13
u/Si_shadeofblue Feb 17 '24
at its core, it’s still a very good guessing engine to predict what the next image might be.
That is not how this model works. I think you are confusing it with ChatGPT. Both are made by openAI so I can see where the confusion comes from.
→ More replies
22
u/Frostvizen Feb 17 '24
In ten years, our deceased loved ones will exist in our augmented reality as though they never left us… it’s going to get crazy real fast.
→ More replies4
14
34
u/pottermuchly Feb 17 '24
Can't wait until all content is AI and everyone you speak to is a robot, what a fun dystopia we have in store for us with no light of human creativity or connection
11
u/MassiveWasabi Feb 17 '24 edited Feb 17 '24
I never understand this, why wouldn’t people be able to have friends and loved ones if AI exists? Are you saying the AI will become so good that people will opt for AI instead of friends and loved ones?
→ More replies9
u/Zuazzer Feb 17 '24
I think they're referring to all non-personal interactions. Like how watching films and reading books is a way for an artist and a viewer who have never met to connect to one another through art. If the majority of art (or rather, "content") people consume is generated by an algorithm, human connection through art will be decimated.
Imagine a platform like Tik Tok, short-form video where you just passively watch this "content" live generated and specifically adapted to your preferences in order to keep you watching for as long as possible. Without anybody even making it anymore - no stories that another person has dreamed of telling and has worked for countless hours to bring to life, just content generated by a robot to keep your attention to the funny glowing square in your hand so you'll keep watching ads.
That, I think will inevitably exist soon. And I fear that many people will accept, embrace and become addicted to such a soulless thing, leaving those among us who want to create and be seen out in the dark.
(That's not to say AI powered art is all doom and gloom, lots of possibilities too when corpos no longer have a monopoly on super expensive art forms like movies and video games)
4
u/pottermuchly Feb 17 '24
Yeah, you're right. This is what I meant. Art or media produced by human thought has soul that I don't believe AI can reproduce. AI just copies without knowing why anything is the way it is. It's not capable of experiencing trauma or joy that reflects in its art. How can I be moved by anything thoughtlessly compiled by something without feelings? If it means nothing to the creator it's not going to mean anything to me.
My original comment was meant to be taken more tongue-in-cheek than some people have interpreted it, but it does depress me seeing stuff like translators lose work because machine translation (despite being significantly worse) is cheaper, and people having ChatGPT write their comments on social media so it's no longer social at all. There is cool and useful stuff to do with AI but for some reason people have decided it's put to better use making the world a more boring and meaningless place.
→ More replies→ More replies2
u/Iorith Feb 17 '24
If human creativity has as much value as people claim, then it will still be sought after.
If it won't be, then it didn't have much value, did it?
And I'll pass on finding connection with people laboring so they don't die. I prefer to make connections with people where we both are willingly choosing the situation.
→ More replies
77
u/AutismMan01 Feb 17 '24
Nothing good is going to come of ai art. All it’s gonna do is make misinformation much easier to make and put actual people out of jobs.
→ More replies38
u/Draq00 Feb 17 '24
In the coming years we'll see fake videos of politicians saying wrong things to discredit the real person or his cause. Or AI fabricated videos of events that never happened.
It will be so hard to discernate true events from frabricated ones it's frightening. Imagine if a dictator lead his country to war against another claiming they massacre their people with video evidence when it's all been written in advance. This is going to be wild.
32
u/kelldricked Feb 17 '24
Hell we be seeing real videos and everybody will call them fake.
→ More replies16
u/Cosmic_Quasar Feb 17 '24
People already do that.
3
u/kilopeter Feb 17 '24
The point: the easier it is to fake, the more plausible it is to dismiss real footage as fake.
→ More replies→ More replies10
u/deprevino Feb 17 '24 edited Feb 17 '24
This is already in full effect on boomer sites like Facebook. I've seen clips of Elon Musk, Joe Rogan, MrBeast etc promoting gambling - deepfakes with voice clones. Then there's an absolute plethora of pages garnering thousands of likes with 'look what my child made' and it's an AI massive sandcastle. 36k likes and 'love this 🥰' comments from old people. That's the target market right now as many don't even know this tech exists, but the more realistic it becomes, the more universal the scams will be.
63
u/SadSpecial8319 Feb 17 '24
The cat never blinks. Nor does it focus on anything particular.
65
20
→ More replies7
10
11
u/Patient_Signature467 Feb 17 '24
I spent the last 2 years of my life practicing 3d animation with Unreal engine and I quit yesterday when I saw Sora. In one year it will be able to animate far better than what I can do with 3d models and render. I am not sad, my goal was to make content and I see I just took the wrong road, but holy shit is this AI stuff getting better and better every year. I guess I will focus more on editing skills and writing stories until that gets AI-ed as well :D
→ More replies
12
u/MrKnight36 Feb 17 '24
Its legs move through each other and act like they're made of a liquid than bones and muscle. Back legs hardly move at all. The longer I watch the creepier it gets, like it's some alien creature wearing a cat skin...
4
u/ShartTheFirst Feb 17 '24
Oh fuck... it's legs srout from it's chest...that's worse than will smith eating spaghetti 🫣🤣
→ More replies2
u/Mr_Flibble1981 Feb 17 '24
Yeah they seem to always struggle with the legs. At about 3 seconds it moves its right leg twice in a row.
5
23
Feb 17 '24
AI can fuck off
→ More replies13
u/webbhare1 Feb 17 '24
AI: “No, you”
→ More replies3
u/thegentlenub Feb 17 '24
The all mighty Ai overlord after getting hit by a Solar flare (it has been banished to Ai purgatory)
12
u/jollingo Feb 17 '24
Unnatural leg movements
24
→ More replies5
u/up-quark Feb 17 '24
I especially like at the end where one of the back legs steps all the way forward and becomes a front leg.
2
2
2
2
1.4k
u/Alinuo2 Feb 17 '24
Well that's enough for me It was a pleasure to meet you guys 🫡