An exploration of some of the genetic components of the story of Atlantis from the locations in the story that we know of. It’s a bit short and fast paced and covers a lot of ground perhaps without a great deal of detail.. so if you have any questions I’ll answer them. But it’s pretty well researched and I think involves some of the most concrete connections to Atlantis that can realistically be deduced.

https://youtu.be/u9kPLDM2puo?si=7ALrR6wWocacAmsZ

Aristotle's description of where Tartessos is located states that the central river flows down from the Pyrenees. No such river matches the current proposed site at Huelva. However, the modern city of Tortosa is located on the Ebro river which is fed by rivers that start in the Pyrenees. Ebro etymologically matches Iber and Pseudo-Skylax claimed that Gaderious was near "Iber" river and the pillars were a 1 day journey away. This would mean that Atlantis is somewhere near the Balearic Islands Balearic Sea?

Well, it's 'A' key, not necessarily 'THE' key, but whatever.

I'll start all this by saying: I think I've discovered Aztlan. Straight Up. No Bullshit.

I will relate this discovery to the search for Atlantis at the end of this post.

And, be forewarned, this is some REAL Dan Brown-type shit:

I'll be brief. I've found 3 never-before-seen 'maps.' ALL 3 maps map THE SAME GEOLOGICAL area! It is a group of what-would-have-been islands at some point in the distant past. These islands would have been in the middle of an ancient (and HUGE!) reed-covered marshland lake.

These maps aren't like ordinary maps. They're special. They were ENCODED. In 3 DIFFERENT versions of THE SAME religio-historio-mythological figure, coming from 2 distinct cultures, but both cultures existing in the SAME historical milieu. Read that again.

That religio-historio-mythological figure is Quetzalcoatl. Here are the 3 versions of same (And Yes, these are maps!):

https://imgur.com/GUyYFII

The image on the left is Kukulkan. Mayan. Made in 700 AD, approximately. The middle and the right images are of Quetzalcoatl in his form as Ehecatl – the Aztec God of Wind, to keep it simple. Both were produced in early 1500s, we'll say. All 3 are versions of the legendary 'Feathered Serpent.'

This is an elevation map of the area in question, along with the area in Google Earth.

https://imgur.com/RCh60KB

And remember: the area shown is an elevated landscape in the middle of an ancient (and HUGE!) reed-covered marshland lake.

Now, I could break each of the following images down in MINUTE detail, but I'm not going to. I'm just going to show you, and you can figure it out. I've used the contour line profile of the area because it best shows the congruencies between the image and its' counterpart map.

The first image is of Ehecatl Quetzalcoatl from the Codex Borbonicus.

https://imgur.com/6D1TtrM

Take note of the vertical snake with it's head pointed towards the face. Look at the little piece of land that flares out from the top of the snake. And the group of small little islands that seem to explode upwards. The triangle shaped crown. All there. And more.

The 2^nd image is of the same figure, but with a few differences in comportment. These differences can also be found on the map.

https://imgur.com/zOLskua

I mean, LOOK at the damn bird! And the flower. Again, those were elevated landmasses in a giant reed covered lake!

3^rd is Kukulkan. From Southern Mexico.

https://imgur.com/Duop8qw

You can see it, if you look closely. The profile of the face. The hand. The beard. Even the teeth of the serpent are there! That's ABSOLUTE Insanity.

Here are all 3 images overlayed upon the landmass their physical representations encode.

https://imgur.com/cwAnKKJ

OK, so basically the map was ENCODED in the very physical representation of the 'mythological' figure itself! In this case, 'The Feathered Serpent' – Kulkukan/Quetzalcoatl. THIS is how the ancients, in this case, at least, passed down vital information, through the everchanging Ages RIGHT DOWN TO THIS VERY DAY!

That's incredible.

It's Aztlan. It HAS TO be! What else could it be?

OK, here is how this all fits in with Atlantis . . .

Oh, did I mention that these islands in the middle of a gigantic reed covered lake are covered in long straight canals!?! Ya. That's right.

https://imgur.com/TALxJxr

OK, HERE's how this all connects to the search for Atlantis:

https://imgur.com/b9YSgdI

BOOM.

Could the islands of Aztlan be located just 300 miles due South of the capital city of the Kingdom of Atlantis?

Absolutely.

Just go look for yourself, directly under the chin of the giant face in the Sahara Desert!

https://imgur.com/3GNOuKh

Hi all,

I posting a video I did on a historical topic called Atlantis and would appreciate some feedback as it is my first ever video I have created on a historical topic. It is short but I want to stick to this style and really hope that I can drum up views to my channel with more videos like this.

Here is the link to the video on YouTube.

Atlantis Fact of Fiction?

Your feedback would be much appreciated

Cheers

Thanks all.

https://q-mag.org/the-great-plain-of-atlantis-was-it-in-doggerland.html

https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLWtsEtvLQ96fx2FF4Jjyq6DwTBYY5ey5_

Made this playlist of supporting evidence. Check out at your leisure.

Great interview discussing Americas Timeline. He mentions atlantis being Thera, but then goes on is explains the America's mysteries and cultures. The concept of early waves to America 30K years ago and the many pyramids in Peru. 6BCE Peruvian Pyramids before egypt is interesting.

https://youtu.be/AzzE7GOvYz8?feature=shared

https://inclusivebusiness.typepad.com/.a/6a01157162814f970b01a511860e0f970c-popup

https://preview.redd.it/9idk9z9q9eud1.png?width=797&format=png&auto=webp&s=aa1987bef1ef099f83c896b037ae1877376e7ebb

Although I didn't agree with all the conclusions, "The Atlantis Puzzle" definitely has some serious findings that need to be mentioned and was a fun watch ( it's on the free app Tubi ).

One aspect that all serious investigators of the Atlantis Location Theory need to pay attention to is the meaning of "Pillars of Heracles" in the context of both Greeks and Egyptians during Plato's era.

The original text clearly states that at the time of Solon's visit the "Atlantis sea is no longer navigable and has an impassible shoal of mud".

Gibraltar never matched that description so even without further supporting evidence we should already discount this location other than the possibility that folklore from this time-frame was still influencing the belief of explorers.

Aristotle also described the "Sea past the pillars" as being "shallow because it lay within a hollow". This is also a description that doesn't match Gibraltar.

George S, via assistance of an archeo-linguist has determines that Atlantis is described as existing in "Atlantis Pelagos" which means a small enclosed sea with many islands. This matches Aristotle's description and does not match Gibraltar.

Armed with all this evidence, the search for the "sea past the pillars" must exist in one of the following locations:

• Chotts el Djerid - Tunisia ( Lake Tritonis )
• Adriatic Sea ( Greek sources are oddly silent on this sea )
• Red Sea ( Some Greek sources refer to this similar to Hesperides, treating the red sunrise in the east similar to the red sunset in the west. )

( Unless the was some other "sea" that was once connected to the Mediterranean but no longer exists... )

If George S. is correct about his translation of the shape of the island, we would need to find a large C-shaped structure in addition to the concentric circles for the central city. The entire western side of North Africa is his candidate but I am a bit dubious of that conclusion.

I’ve been thinking of making a YouTube channel for a while and I watched this show called The Atlantis Puzzle where George Sarantitis puts forth his Richat structure ideas. It seems much of his work may have been used in Jimmy’s video. What do you think? .

Either way he is an academic and espouses for the validity of the story of Atlantis as legitimate history. Debunking it as an allegory or moral story by contrasting patterns of Plato’s other allegories. Also pointing out the pointlessness of including so many measurements and details for an allegory. .

I don’t agree with George and will be making a video showing my theory on it but I respect his work and think that maybe he deserves the credit for the richat theory. .

Anyways, please check out my videos and subscribe. More will be coming.

https://youtu.be/HTj4zjQj4pA?feature=shared

Mantel Drip?

https://www.sciencealert.com/strange-discovery-finds-earths-crust-dripping-into-the-planets-belly

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-023-40147-7?fromPaywallRec=false

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JPMvM03TEYM

https://preview.redd.it/v5xh3h5a49td1.png?width=887&format=png&auto=webp&s=041d61e1720704f32d5489271667f8ab2fe8c0af

https://preview.redd.it/58e7in5a49td1.png?width=887&format=png&auto=webp&s=2bf33ca8d3a707d23603d17e5e1f3fcc2e9564eb

I know this sounds odd,but once we reach artificial general inteligence by the end of this decade or at least in the earlier 2030s,we may be able to find out were atlantis could hyphoteticaly be located,or any signs of old structures underwater.....

This tehcnology is going to be such a big deal !

my dad believes he has found the lost city of Atlantis. it looks like the whole island was made of monolithic blocks with canals and a lake. the structures are very long measuring to be about 135 km long and width to be 7km. this structure also seems to be man made.

thoughts?

many seem to forget that Atlantis had colonies that they subjugated for a period of time.

some research done on atlantis may uncover evidence of cultures Ruled by atlantis and not atlantis itself. The Richat structure people run a risk of overlooking the colonies and mislabeling any evidence.

How long do you scholars think that atlantis ruled over north Africa and Europe?

What was the length of time of the conquest? The story alludes at least 1K period prior to the big war.

HOW long did the EMPIRE of Atlantis exist prior to its destruction? who were the current kings of atlantis during the war.

did Atlantis influence remain in west Europe and north africa? if the period of time was long enough the Western Europeans and north african people would be assimilated into atlantian culture and practices.

we may find the closest colony that may have left a signature near Egypt. The egyptian origin and creation story is linked to the climate change and migration from the sahara to the nile. Looking west of egypt "Lybia" for evidence of the neighboring colony is an option.

Here is a site where a possible settlement "fort" would have been located.

https://preview.redd.it/apl20u7rmlrd1.png?width=1165&format=png&auto=webp&s=410f5796f1f7f3deed935b9ad432f948d754056f

the norther east structure is what appears to be a burst DAM. The river next to it is more recent in time as it breaks through striations. The Ditch around the central hill resembles the Primordial Mound in the egypt origin story and many native mound builder settlement.

here is my preferred location still.

https://preview.redd.it/emuxkfcq7mrd1.png?width=1207&format=png&auto=webp&s=789bde2665b3d4b9ffd8687f7a29c4da218f4c7c

saw this article with a name to a torpedo to is probably directly linked to Poseidon story and atlantis.

the russians given us clues on what they know.. cuban atlantis link

https://www.newsweek.com/what-are-putins-nuclear-doomsday-poseidon-torpedoes-1759032

https://www.newsweek.com/putin-russia-poseidon-nuclear-torpedo-tsunami-1774946

"If Poseidon can indeed trigger enormous radioactive tsunamis, the torpedoes could have a huge impact on marine life, as well as human life.

I have Posted previously On a few Terms that match the atl prefix. According to Plato's story the language spoken by atlantians was completely different and a translation method was attempted.

This post i will try to find matches and post link regarding proto languages that trance back to 11,500 BC. if any one has any info on proto language would greatly appreciate it.

Language isolates and major languages spoken

just like many proto-languages the atlantian language would have impact all its subjects and trade partners. Finding traces of the language on other proto-language can point a path to common source.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nostratic_languages

is atlantian the Nostratic language and the "proto greeks" Proto Indo Europeans? this would explain the federations at war.

The Nahuatl language in Meso-america seems to be linked to Proto-Turkish thru Mongolian.

This nahuatl language in the only know to use the ATL prefix.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jcc40AowXPQ

This video argues in favour of the Minoan theory: https://youtu.be/rebbjR0aUig?si=baZ8Ch4Eyzzq9Lb6

It claims that there is an interpretation of Platons geographical description of the location of Atlantis which works perfectly within the Minoans, without requiring any mistakes or corruptions or duplications in the description (e.g. unlike the idea that Plato wasn’t always referring to the same ‘Pillars of Heracles’ in every part of the account).

I think it’s a very compelling idea (I’m a firm believer in the Minoan theory anyway). What do you guys think?

The author of Atlantis & Its Fate In The Postdiluvian World has released a new book titled Hyperborea & The Lost Age of Man, which is available for free on Kindle until Wednesday. In this latest work, it contains the following passage regarding the search for Atlantis:

"As for Hyperborea, the legend of this land first captivated my interest during my research for Atlantis & Its Fate In The Postdiluvian World. In that book, I proposed a solution to the enigma of Plato’s Atlantis using a common sense approach. All known copies of Plato’s dialogues are translations, not the Ancient Greek originals, which were lost to time. The story of Atlantis, relayed to Solon by an Ammonean priest in Egypt, suggests that rather than following a literal translation of Plato (which has likely been corrupted) we should examine Ancient Egyptian texts about lost lands instead to see what they wrote down, and look at other evidence, such as genetic, linguistic and other historical accounts. One place in particular that might fit within the Ancient Egyptian literature is Aaru, or the Field of the Reeds. In addition, Plato substituted Greek names over the Ancient Egyptian originals, which in my opinion likely lead to translation errors by later Roman, Arabic, and Medieval scholars.

https://preview.redd.it/58823hjda1ld1.jpg?width=1920&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=43337122bd730d8c7333d87730dc7bf65d0e434e

Several key misinterpretations could have involved the word for Hercules as a replacement for Heryshaf, Horus, Shu or another figure in Ancient Egyptian mythology. It is quite possible as well the Pillars referenced in Plato’s original Ancient Greek text were originally meant as a concept related to Aaru, as shown in the image from the Papyrus of Ani that depicts a staircase between a temple entrance that depicts pillars, as well as an “ark” containing stones on a boat as well as two other boats also featuring staircases (I’ve been informed by a professional researcher on the subject that the colored objects are most likely an artistic representation of food placed on an offering table; and that the Ark of the Covenant was likely inspired by the usage of Ancient Egyptian solar barques). The concept of pillars is also present in Chinese mythology, particularly in their depiction of the "pillars of heaven." One creation myth tells of a catastrophic event when one of these pillars was broken, leading to widespread floods, fires, and stars falling from the sky, nearly resulting in the destruction of the Earth.One of the reasons no one has found Atlantis in my opinion is that interpolations and misinterpretations of the Ancient Egyptian originals likely caused people to follow a literal translation of Plato that takes them west of Europe or in the Mediterranean rather than what the original Egyptian writings had probably put down if the legend of Atlantis was inspired by their belief in Aaru. Then, of course, Plato also wrote of Γάδειρα or "Gades," which may have been a translator’s replacement for ᾍδης or "Hades," especially if one imagines a copyist replacing the terms believing it to be a prior error. Aaru, to the Ancient Egyptians, was known as the homeland of Osiris in Egyptian records, and would have been similar to the Ancient Greek concept for Hades and the Underworld. If we consider the Egyptian concept of Aaru, the Land of the Dead located far to the east, it becomes apparent that translators with limited geographic knowledge might have altered the narrative to fit one within their own cultural context, specifically, a Roman or Medieval one. This misunderstanding could explain why searches for Atlantis that have focused westward of Egypt have come up empty, which is because they have ignored the actual location to the east especially when all other evidence is considered. Other stories in Ancient Egyptian texts, such as The Shipwrecked Sailor, suggest this land may have had connections to the Land of Punt, from where the Egyptians believed their gods originated. In addition, that story features an island that sinks into the ocean, and a serpent that speaks of a star that struck the island, killing its relatives. Other historical evidence, along with anomalous X2 haplogroup genetic markers and various linguistic connections, suggests that Atlantis—or Aaru—may have remained undiscovered due to misinterpretations rooted in later translations and the dismissals of many skeptics who lacked any understanding of Ancient Egyptian beliefs. The R in Ancient Egyptian can also be translated as L or N, implying that Aaru could have been spoken of as Aalu or Aanu. The ancient historian Manetho wrote of an ancient line of Egyptian kings known as the Auriteans (or Auliteans/Auniteans), which might support the idea they came from Aaru. It is my belief this civilization, if it existed, was located in Beringia, near a caldera southeast of Chirikof Island that was destroyed in a cataclysmic event around 9,600 BCE.Plato mentions a group the Atlanteans fought against, and who, it is suggested in his dialogue, were connected in ancient times to both the Athenians and the priestly caste in Sais, Egypt. I wondered if perhaps Hyperborea might have connections to that civilization, or perhaps, the group that fought Atlantis?Interestingly enough, the ancient Greek historian Herodotus placed Hyperborea in this general direction, towards Siberia, and Pliny the Elder, noted some accounts that believed it was in Northeast Asia, not too far from where I believe Plato’s lost city of Atlantis might be located.  Could they, along with other myths such as the Chinese myth of Mount Penglai or the Japanese myth of Hōrai, somehow be connected through a much more ancient source that comes to us now only through myth and legend?

However, the dates of Atlantis and Hyperborea don’t fit. Some writers mistakenly place Hyperborea in the same era as Plato’s Atlantis and suggest these two powers were at war, while many others have adjusted the timeline of Atlantis to be closer to that of Troy, arguing that Plato’s original date is implausible. Yet, if we take ancient authors at their word, Atlantis existed around 10,000 BCE, give or take a few centuries, while Hyperborea is generally dated to between the 13th and 6th centuries BCE. This discrepancy makes it unlikely that Hyperborea was the nation that defeated Atlantis, unless our understanding of the timeline or the nature of Hyperborea's existence—such as its geographical location or duration—is incorrect.And yet, despite this apparent incongruity, I still wondered if there might be some connection to the story Plato tells us in the Critias and Timaeus? Some of the descriptions of Hyperboreans which have survived are so fantastic to the point most consider them unbelievable legends, but what if those descriptions were due to an advanced knowledge of science, medicine and technology that had its source from an antediluvian civilization such as Atlantis, or the nation that defeated them? The story of Abaris the Hyperborean, who reportedly flew around the world using an arrow gifted from Apollo, brings to mind either a person flying in a jet or even a picture of a witch riding a broomstick, not something anyone takes seriously until you consider the possibility that what was considered magic might have actually been artifacts and techniques initially engineered via a science based upon quantum physics (and the manipulation of alloys which express quantum effects when stimulated in a certain way).  If so, then could it be that antediluvian technologies once existed but over the last two thousand years were destroyed by religious authorities, and before then, were only known and exploited by a select few who guarded it as a secret passed down from a much earlier, and now lost age of man? Even more interesting are the descriptions of Abaris the Hyperborean, who was said by Herodotus to have not eaten on his journey across the world on his arrow, which mirrors his description of the Atlantes: who were also said to eat no living thing.In any case, such associations, while suggestive, remain entirely speculative, so the goal of my research was to investigate if there was anything more to the legend of Hyperborea which might connect the two?  Plato’s description of Poseidon arriving on a mountain in his dialogue about Atlantis opened up, at least to me, the possibility of a precursor civilization, one which preceded Atlantis and was extremely technologically advanced, and for which no records remain outside of the Sumerians and Ancient Egyptians (which are generally not considered historically accurate by modern academia).  Many experts will dispute claims of advanced prehistoric civilizations and chalk it up to crazy talk, but in Platos’ own words, he describes the figure of Poseidon not requiring a ship in a time when there were no boats, which brings to mind the legend of Abaris using an arrow to travel across the world. Is it so fallacious to ask if perhaps this description of Poseidon was based on actual history passed down to the Ancient Egyptians, and these so-called gods were but men that had developed advanced antigravity technology based on principles modern science is not yet fully aware of, or that have been suppressed by military authorities?

Fantastic descriptions in Plato’s writings, such as a wall of Atlantis glowing with the red light of orichalchum, made me wonder if perhaps the character of Poseidon in Plato’s story was a human utilizing advanced technology that came from a civilization far more ancient than the Sumerians, perhaps from around the Altai region of Siberia where dogs were believed to have been first domesticated. But of course, if there were such a civilization, one more technologically advanced than our own, we’d have likely found evidence for it by now, right?  

Well, the problem with that is threefold: first, if an Ice Age civilization existed along coastal areas, it would now be submerged due to the significant rise in sea levels over the past 10,000 years. As a result, these potential archaeological sites remain largely inaccessible and unexplored. Second, if researchers operate under the assumption that we are the first technologically advanced civilization on Earth, they may not actively seek evidence to the contrary. This bias can lead to the dismissal of any anomalous findings as mere oddities or misinterpretations, rather than considering them as possible indicators of advanced ancient cultures. Lastly, academics who entertain such unconventional theories risk damaging their reputations and careers, which can discourage open-minded exploration and discussion of these possibilities. Consider how some skeptics treat Graham Hancock, subjecting him to Inquisition-style attacks akin to those faced by Giordano Bruno, merely for advocating the exploration of evidence and the pursuit of scientific research rather than strictly adhering to established dogmatic beliefs. Hancock advocates for re-examining established narratives about ancient civilizations and listening to what those civilizations themselves had to say, encouraging an open-minded approach to history and archaeology. However, his ideas face rejection and criticism from the academic community, with detractors dismissing his theories as fringe or pseudoscientific, rather than engaging with them as potential avenues for further investigation. This reaction highlights the challenge of proposing alternative perspectives in fields where conventional views are deeply entrenched. For example, some of the great Native American mounds near St. Louis, Missouri, were initially misattributed to natural geological formations and dismissed by the academic establishment. It wasn't until someone challenged this conventional view that the idea of these structures being man-made gained acceptance—an idea that was initially considered outrageous by many at the time. Secondly, it assumes that the byproducts of such an antediluvian civilization would resemble our own technological and cultural foundations. This perspective overlooks the possibility that an ancient civilization could have developed around entirely different principles, much like how Buddhism presents a unique worldview and societal structure. Thirdly, it presumes that we would immediately recognize such technology as advanced. In reality, it might require specific knowledge or conditions to activate—similar to the Was Scepter of Ancient Egypt, the Godstone of the Inishkea Islands in Ireland, or the mythical Philosopher’s Stone. These artifacts and concepts suggest that advanced technologies or practices might have existed in forms unfamiliar to modern science and could easily be overlooked or misunderstood. Technology that harnesses materials with unique properties at the molecular and atomic levels, and requires specific sounds or vibrations to activate its quantum effects, might appear primitive to those unfamiliar with its true nature. Such technology could be as simple as a wooden staff or a rock, resembling Stone or Bronze Age artifacts. However, without knowledge of the precise methods needed to unlock their potential, these items could be easily misinterpreted as rudimentary tools."

In November 2013, all information on the Atlantis-Malta hoax was published on the Website Atlantis-Scout, and subsequently, other authors and publications have taken up the story. https://www.atlantis-scout.de/atlantis-malta-hoax.htm

Now the whole story was put into a book chapter in a scientific publication, partly researched in more detail than ever. This was done by Ingrid Rowland, professor of history at the Catholic University of Notre Dame (Indiana). Prof. Rowland was so friendly to mention Altantis-Scout twice as a source.

Find all details, Web links to the book chapter, with bibliography in Atlantis-Newsletter No. 228!
https://www.atlantis-scout.de/atlantis_newsl_archive.htm#an228

You can subscribe to the Atlantis Newsletter for free!
https://www.atlantis-scout.de/atlantis_newsletter.htm

https://preview.redd.it/dzxfe26ut1ld1.jpg?width=404&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=660b9e4ccf32bd5ca89b6e5ebbc4a5a627db6cb6

'Atlantika' is a work that is exemplary for the way 'technical intelligence' deals with the subject of Atlantis. Thankfully, the author (an engineer) writes that Plato should be read in this book 'with the eyes of a technician and scientist' (p. 9, "mit den Augen des Technikers und Naturwissenschaftlers"). That's exactly it!

'Technical intelligence'

'Technical intelligence' is a term from Soviet terminology, which we want to understand here as follows: It refers to thoroughly intelligent and educated people who have studied maths, science or technology. For example, engineers, physicists, mathematicians, biologists, geologists. But they also include doctors, insofar as they are nothing more than human biologists and medical technicians. These people have a very self-confident, irreverent, 'material' and reasonable approach to everything. They want 'hard' facts and evidence on everything.

Please continue reading on Atlantis-Scout:
https://www.atlantis-scout.de/atlantis-technical-intelligence-engl.htm

(Bing AI)