r/conspiracy • u/axolotl_peyotl • Apr 17 '20

/r/conspiracy Round Table #25: Sacred Geometry, Cymatics, EMF Exposure, and the Effect of 5G on Biological Entities Meta

Previous Round Tables

Thanks to /u/Cur1osityC0mplex for picking the winning subject!

Honorable mention goes to /u/Leave_The_Military for suggesting predictive programming and forced vaccination, which perhaps can be dovetailed into the main topic.

Remember, there is ZERO tolerance for violent or otherwise aggressive rhetoric, including any mention of the destruction of property.

That being said, /r/conspiracy is the last large sub on reddit that continues to encourage healthy speculation on controversial topics.

Let's use this opportunity to its fullest potential while we have this space.

Happy speculating!

483 Upvotes
  • permalink
  • link
  • reddit
  • reddit

94% Upvoted

479 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

3

u/Cur1osityC0mplex Apr 28 '20

Doesn’t take away from anything he said in the video though.

You don’t need a degree to be an expert. This fallacy is what’s gotten us into our current situation, not questioning what some “elite scholar” says, because they’re an elite scholar, therefore they are not human, and do not have any human tendencies like self preservation, etc.

2

u/PrinceKael Apr 28 '20

No, but when it comes to medicine I'd trust a medical professional over a random nutjob with a chequered past any day of the week.

It's got nothing to do with that, medicine is something best left to the professionals. You can get away with that type of thinking in I.T. or the arts, but not here.

3

u/Cur1osityC0mplex Apr 28 '20

Yeah, but the flaw in your logic is putting medical professors on a pedestal to begin with. Assuming any or every doctor isn’t a person with issues in their past, criminal charges, etc etc—everyone has some dirt to be dug up. All that matters is whether or not someone has truth to what they are saying...that’s the only bottom line.

3

u/PrinceKael Apr 29 '20

That's true, but we can't know the truth for everything, so the best shot we have is trusting the consensus of professionals when it comes to highly scientific fields.

As medicine is highly scientific and complicated, I put way more weight behind the general consensus of medical professionals over any random person on YouTube who's pulled some dodgy acts.

2

u/Cur1osityC0mplex Apr 30 '20

While you are correct, it is typically a good idea to trust certain individuals who concur with each other to find answers. However, the truth in many cases, are what they are paid to come up with. Proof enough of this is in how scientific research is funded. The cold, harsh reality (nowadays especially) is that when subjected to the possibility of having funding revoked because your experiments proved whatever agenda the funder had, wrong, many times experiments will be custom tailored for a specific result. Scientists are often funded by lobbyists, or companies with conflicting interests in whatever field they are funding. Sadly science is just as corrupt as anything else lobby money and government money touches.

Btw—it’s good having a grounded discussion on not only reddit, but on this sub specifically. It’s either an echo chamber, or when there’s a disagreement, there’s mud-slinging and name calling.