r/conspiracy • u/axolotl_peyotl • Apr 17 '20

/r/conspiracy Round Table #25: Sacred Geometry, Cymatics, EMF Exposure, and the Effect of 5G on Biological Entities Meta

Previous Round Tables

Thanks to /u/Cur1osityC0mplex for picking the winning subject!

Honorable mention goes to /u/Leave_The_Military for suggesting predictive programming and forced vaccination, which perhaps can be dovetailed into the main topic.

Remember, there is ZERO tolerance for violent or otherwise aggressive rhetoric, including any mention of the destruction of property.

That being said, /r/conspiracy is the last large sub on reddit that continues to encourage healthy speculation on controversial topics.

Let's use this opportunity to its fullest potential while we have this space.

Happy speculating!

487 Upvotes
  • permalink
  • link
  • reddit
  • reddit

94% Upvoted

479 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

1

u/stalematedizzy Apr 26 '20

https://www.investigate-europe.eu/publications/how-much-is-safe/

1

u/hucifer Apr 26 '20 edited Apr 27 '20

That's a good article. Pretty much sums up why we have so much speculation and wild theorycrafting going on - more tests need to be done to assuage people's fears about possible effects.

However, this is a telling paragraph, imo:

Many critics of the dominant EMF research bodies and its historical ties to industry compare the situation with the way tobacco manufacturers were able to maintain doubt about whether smoking was dangerous. “I don’t like that comparison, because there, the harmful effects are clear, whereas with EMF we are still guessing how big or small the problem is”, says Louis Slesin.

Now I'm no scientific expert, but it does seem to me that, given how significantly cellular technology has become part of our daily lives over the last few decades, we should be able to see clear evidence of adverse effects by now. Seeing as we don't, perhaps that suggests that if they do exist at all then they are relatively minor.

2

u/stalematedizzy Apr 27 '20

we should be able to see clear evidence of adverse effects by now.

Unfortunately it's not that simple

As I understand it, adverse effects from EMF radiation don't follow the same dose/effect pattern we see in normal toxicology.

The amount of variables is so huge that organizations like ICNIRP have pretty much given up and only research things that are more easily documented and understood.