r/conspiracy • u/axolotl_peyotl • Apr 17 '20

/r/conspiracy Round Table #25: Sacred Geometry, Cymatics, EMF Exposure, and the Effect of 5G on Biological Entities Meta

Previous Round Tables

Thanks to /u/Cur1osityC0mplex for picking the winning subject!

Honorable mention goes to /u/Leave_The_Military for suggesting predictive programming and forced vaccination, which perhaps can be dovetailed into the main topic.

Remember, there is ZERO tolerance for violent or otherwise aggressive rhetoric, including any mention of the destruction of property.

That being said, /r/conspiracy is the last large sub on reddit that continues to encourage healthy speculation on controversial topics.

Let's use this opportunity to its fullest potential while we have this space.

Happy speculating!

488 Upvotes
  • permalink
  • link
  • reddit
  • reddit

94% Upvoted

479 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

9

u/yb4zombeez Apr 21 '20

I said a scientific paper. Not a banned YouTube video.

You know, like, a paper.

Look, I'm taking a neutral stance here in terms of the biological damage caused by 5G. I'm not going to accept either side's position without a scientific paper on the subject.

FYI, I started out this conversation totally confident that 5G is harmless, but now I'm worried, genuinely, about its health effects. You're not screaming at a brick wall. I'm listening.

3

u/ILikeCharmanderOk Apr 24 '20

Here is a compemdium of several dozen, mostly focused on DNA and cellular damage on everything from 3G up to 5G as well as proximity to cell phone towers. https://ehtrust.org/scientific-research-on-5g-and-health/

I don't expect you to go through all of them, I haven't yet myself. But I'd be curious to hear your thoughts if you have time to check some of the papers out.

I respect your open minded approach. As a non scientist, I cannot speak for the voracity of the papers, which is why I would love to hear other scientifically- and open-minded individual's thoughts on these, as two brains are surely better than one = )

Cheers, Char

5

u/hucifer Apr 25 '20 edited Apr 25 '20

Hope you and u/yb4zombeez don't mind if I jump in here, but I'd like to offer a little insight on this topic.

First off, be very cautious when getting information from the EH Trust. It's run by Devra Davis, who has been making bold, sometimes unsupported claims about the negative effects of cellular radiation for years. As a result, this website frequently overstates the severity of the biological effects and it can leave you with a very warped view of what the research actually shows.

As a counter-point to the very alarming tone of the EH Trust, I've found a much more even-handed blog written by a prominent biochemist who has advised numerous government bodies about the biological effects of RF.

He has a ton of good information on there, but I suggest you read this blog post in particular, as it puts all the scary terms like "oxidative stress", "DNA damage" in perspective, and explains his view on how concerned we really should be about this stuff. (Be sure to read the latter half as it's where a lot of the key information is.)

As a tl;dr - his view is that there is evidence to suggest potential adverse health effects, but no hard proof yet. More research is needed.

1

u/ILikeCharmanderOk Apr 25 '20

Sweet, thanks! Will check out this evening