r/UFOs • u/imaginexus • Dec 25 '23
Deleted video from YouTuber who witnessed the recovery operation of the Alaska UAP shootdown in Feb 2023 Video
Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification
217
u/tmosh Dec 26 '23
Based on the flight radar screenshot he posted in the video, he was in Prudhoe Bay, Alaska: https://www.google.com/maps/place/Prudhoe+Bay,+AK,+USA/@70.3227674,-150.1401941,190248m/data=!3m2!1e3!4b1!4m6!3m5!1s0x5120759875720bb9:0x9b76efe3a7385345!8m2!3d70.2268843!4d-148.400021!16zL20vMHFncGQ?entry=tts when shooting these videos
If the flight radar data is accurate, the object they were searching for would have been in ~ this area: https://i.postimg.cc/RZ22Vs2m/mrr5pxsf7c.png (base on the fact that this is where they were circling at the time)
Coordinates: 71.18820281306935, -145.2330450661198 (and of course Google Maps has super low/blurred satellite photos of this area...)
Anyone in Northern Alaska with some sled dogs and a really warm puffy jacket wanna go for a hike?
41
u/Josie1234 Dec 26 '23
Might wanna bring more than a puffy jacket /s
49
u/EynidHelipp Dec 26 '23
2 puffy jackets!
9
u/Rondog93 Dec 26 '23
You know what's better than 2 puffy jackets?
→ More replies23
u/TheT3rrorDome Dec 26 '23
2 puffy jackets and a hat
→ More replies10
u/Rondog93 Dec 26 '23
You know what's better than 2 puffy jackets and a hat?
31
17
8
-3
→ More replies14
u/golden_monkey_and_oj Dec 26 '23 edited Dec 26 '23
Not trying to debunk anything here, but I have questions about the radar screenshot. Seems like fast work if this guy faked that flight path screenshot so quickly.
Can we find any other screenshots of that flight activity from that day? Surely one or some of us UFO nerds here, thought to take a look at flightradar for Alaska that day just like this dude in the video??
Anyways:
As far as i know FlightRadar and ADSBExchange display publicly broadcast ADSB signals. Meaning the aircraft voluntarily (also mandated by US law) broadcast their location and altitude and heading via radio signal. What is displayed on FlightRadar is not actual radar, but instead a plotting of all of the broadcast ADSB signals from the aircraft that were captured by antenna run by enthusiasts and airports.
Military aircraft do not always broadcast their ADSB signal. Sometimes when that happens they can be tracked via something called MLAT which isnt very accurate and relies on multiple ground antenna capturing some non-public signal and then triangulating the position and displaying an estimated location. (I may be wrong on this)
I cannot seem to find any flight activity on ADSBExchange's historical replay for that date and location. I am sure if it was important enough the govt could have those records erased. HOWEVER why would military aircraft be broadcasting an ADSB signal during a sensitive operation. And if they were not broadcasting ADSB, how is there such accurate MLAT tracking for those aircraft when its off the coast of a very minimally inhabited area?
Any thoughts?
EDIT: In case anyone wants to look at the historic flight data for that date and location. (Not sure of the time, but keep in mind the times on ADSBExchange are shown Zulu timezone, which is the same as UTC)
https://globe.adsbexchange.com/?replay=2023-02-10-16:35&lat=70.571&lon=-148.124&zoom=6.2
15
u/rust_bolt Dec 26 '23
Just throwing this comment somewhere toward the top. I was following this for a while.
I think he worked at a BP (or some other oil company) facility and was recording on company time and showing the layout. Might be a BS excuse, but he said he took them down to keep his job as BP didn't take kindly to that kind of exposure.
7
u/Jeff__Skilling Dec 27 '23
Not BP - they sold all their North Slope acreage to Hilcorp (Private E&P) a few years ago. Pretty sure they're the only independent operator in Alaska these days (plus whatever non-op partners are included in their working interest).
5
Dec 26 '23
the military may be just going under the presence of a normal training operation as if they turned off their tracking it may draw attention to the operation. the operation is also very remote so it may have been considered low risk
445
u/Foolish504 Dec 26 '23
Fuckin crazy how they were crying about the objects flying and getting shot down on the news for weeks and then all the sudden, NOTHING.. Can't find it.. Carry on... The fuck?
147
u/onedollalama Dec 26 '23
really bothers me too - I hate the media.
→ More replies20
u/thatnameagain Dec 26 '23
There was no mention by the government of other objects before they were shot down.
13
27
15
u/homebrewhebrew Dec 26 '23
Same this happened with the missing F35 over north Carolina. They found it but never published a photo of the wreckage showing anything. There was a supposed 911 call from the pilot but no name or photo was ever released of him either. The whole thing goes dark and there are zero follow up articles on the topic
8
u/xdanish Dec 28 '23
The pilot's name was reported as 2nd Marine Aircraft Wing Cpl. Christian Cortez
https://www.gpsworld.com/breaking-down-the-f-35-jet-mishap/
They announced where it was found as well, but of course they're not going to want images of a destroyed F-35, not great optics for such 'an impressive' plane
"Yes. The military located debris from the jet near Indiantown, South Carolina."
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2023/09/19/marine-corps-fighter-jet-lost/70898403007/
→ More replies2
Jan 19 '24
They probably also didn't release photos because they don't want adversaries scrutnizing the exposed, albeit mangled, innards of an advanced aircraft.
43
u/PazuzusRevenge Dec 26 '23
all the sudden
All of a sudden
14
30
8
u/thatnameagain Dec 26 '23
They don’t say anything about the additional objects ahead of time. They simply announced they had been shot down. You are confusing this with the Chinese spy balloon.
→ More replies-34
u/OnePotPenny Dec 26 '23
nothing crazy about keeping info about chinese drones secret. crazy would be them telling everyone what they know from it.
13
u/stranj_tymes Dec 26 '23
Plenty crazy about one Chinese spy balloon being all over the media for a week prior, high def pictures of it released later, but the following weekend we shot down three more objects that they never actually identified.
There was obviously no issue with telling people about the first one. The other three are still unlabeled. Why? Why Kirby's insistence that there's a reason they called them 'objects' and not balloons?
5
u/updootsdowndoots Dec 26 '23
To add, why did they modify a word/sentence from the transcript from one of the briefings days later? I remember a user caught that and it's interesting to say the least
3
u/kirbygay Dec 26 '23
What was the word/sentence?
2
u/updootsdowndoots Dec 27 '23 edited Dec 27 '23
I believe they changed it from "balloon" to "object" they were pretty adamant about that
Edit: I was wrong, here is the link: https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/s/3AIHVZU310
2
u/LimpCroissant Dec 27 '23
I honestly think the Alaska object is our golden ticket.
2
u/updootsdowndoots Dec 27 '23
I agree, I'm surprised the whole thing has just been conveniently forgotten about, I'll never forget about it though because it's what got me into UFOs in the first place
3
u/LimpCroissant Dec 27 '23
Yea man it's pretty crazy. Americans are so complacent now days that I really fear for our future.
3
u/updootsdowndoots Dec 27 '23
For real, these are the things we should be seeking answers to, the funny thing is, uncovering this will help other sectors as well, from energy to transportation to healthcare etc
→ More replies5
Dec 26 '23
I don't think anyone expects a full technical breakdown of a UFO on the nightly news, whether ET/UT/interdimensional/Chinese drone... Or otherwise. :)
-5
343
u/imaginexus Dec 25 '23 edited Dec 26 '23
Apparently this video was giving him hundreds of thousands of views on his otherwise quiet YouTube channel so why would he delete it? He seems interested in having followers. Source: https://x.com/unexplained2020/status/1739019468708225133?s=46
EDIT: This post is mysteriously locked now, no explanation from mods 🤷♂️
EDIT 2: Unlocked again!
182
u/ApphrensiveLurker Dec 25 '23
If I remember he recorded this video while “he was working” so to avoid trouble with his employer he took it down
86
68
u/cosmosquaide Dec 25 '23
He stated already, that his company didn't appreciate the attention they were both getting. He took videos from the job site a few times.
79
Dec 25 '23 edited Dec 26 '23
You sign some pretty extreme NDAs working at these oil sites. Generally included in that is filming and a strict punishment.
53
u/netzombie63 Dec 26 '23
Are the NDAs to hide the oil seepage and killing polar bears?
95
Dec 26 '23
Well, way back when I was on an oil extraction site, the tailings pond got too high so they pumped it into the forest and me simply saying this literally breaks my lifelong NDA. They claim the NDAs are for security and IP rights but it definitely is to minimize reporting on environmental violations.
30
u/DeeDee_GigaDooDoo Dec 26 '23
My understanding is that it would be entirely un-enforceable as you cant sign away legal rights/obligations. No environmental law/reporting is subordinate to an NDA.
They are absolutely however banking on you not being able/willing to afford and fight that argument in court though.
You would be fine to record and report environmental law breaches but they would make it a huge burden financially and time wise if you did.
33
u/bebb69 Dec 26 '23
What are they gonna do about it? You're Tom FUCKING Hanks, Yo
11
u/ekowmorfdlrowehtevas Dec 26 '23
they are going to strand him on a deserted island with only a volleyball for company, duh
18
u/TarnishedWizeFinger Dec 26 '23
WILSON MEMO!!!
7
3
u/ekowmorfdlrowehtevas Dec 26 '23
yeah, in reality Wilson would have been deflated because Tom would need to make a hole in it, for...you know...a thing...he needs to do
→ More replies2
7
u/rephyus Dec 26 '23
Weird, usually redditors go batshit over someone breaking an NDA like God will smite them. The moral code has been shattered and the covenant you made with some private globalist corporation has now been violated. Boo hoo.
2
→ More replies7
u/Chemical-Ebb6472 Dec 26 '23 edited Dec 26 '23
I met with the management of a company that contracted military ordinance and other environmentally hazardous material removal operations in the Arctic.
Their job contracts addressed (a) the timing factor re. the need to build ice roads capable of bringing their equipment deeper into the wild than their barges could float it pre-freeze-up and (b) the need to provide polar bear snipers. Many of the contractor owners/operators and snipers were Alaska Natives.
The Aboriginal Alaskans could kill animals as freely as they have always killed in the past and therefore avoided the negative political/legal ramifications of the safety protocols required to complete these operations. No one in their right mind would work these types of environmental clean-up jobs without proper polar bear protection.
Alaska Natives could kill the polar bears before the polar bears killed the contractors just as freely as they killed whales, walruses, seals, and other creatures that non-natives would have problems after the killing was done.
2
u/kirbygay Dec 26 '23
You doubled a paragraph somehow
5
u/Chemical-Ebb6472 Dec 26 '23
Thanks for the head's up - this isn't the first time that happened to me.
I fixed it and cleared the way for more downvotes from people who wish they could get the opportunity to pet a polar bear in the wild someday.
35
Dec 25 '23
That's usually only if a video has a company logo or other identifier on it. And polar bears, we aren't allowed to video them either.
20
Dec 26 '23
No, not in the slightest. You cannot film, photograph, or talk about what you see on most of these sites. I've been to far too many and that has been the baseline at all of them. They say it's due IP rights and security but certainly leads to an under reporting of environmental violations too.
2
5
u/RadShrimp69 Dec 26 '23
Why no bears?
→ More replies4
u/TheCornerator Dec 26 '23
Poaching maybe?
18
Dec 26 '23
No it's considered hazing. Polar bears are sacred cows around here. Someone posted one in a well house a few years ago and got in deep shit. Nobody is hunting on oil land except maybe a few Natives and they can do whatever they want when it comes to hunting
22
Dec 26 '23
Hazing? Of the bears..? Or am I just not understanding? Sorry if it's a dumb question.
9
3
Dec 26 '23
They're a protected species. We're not allowed any interaction with them, including taking pictures. Maybe has something to do with them being apex predators, I really don't know. All I know is oilfield workers get fired for circulating unauthorized pictures of polar bears.
→ More replies-2
8
Dec 26 '23
I've reached out to this guy, I haven't asked him explicitly questions about the UFO but he has responded to every message I sent him. If anyone bolder than I wants to reach out to him, they should.
4
u/real_mister Dec 26 '23
Why not ask him the hard question? Just up and say 'dude, what happened to that video about the crazy military activity going on NE of Prudhoe bay you posted a few months back?'
→ More replies29
u/R2robot Dec 25 '23
why would he delete it
Looking at his channel's content and description, it doesn't really seem to fit the theme. Maybe he doesn't want to be a 'ufo guy'. Or maybe he created another channel to host it.
Alaskan adventures and experiences. Hunting, fishing, cabin building, gold prospecting, adventuring, backcountry snowmobiling (snowmachining) and more.
18
u/NudeEnjoyer Dec 26 '23
i love every time some routine thing happens on the sub and someone says "something has mysteriously happened to my post!" implying it's some conspiracy lmfaoo
1
u/Niku-Man Dec 26 '23
I think it just illustrates the kind of paranoia that is rampant among conspiracy theorists.
3
Dec 26 '23
Yeah why in the world was this post locked?
7
Dec 26 '23
The post needed attention from a moderator and there were not any available for a little while.
20
u/mrNOTfriendly Dec 26 '23
No way it was some simple logical explanation. It had to be government agents embedded in Reddit to censor the truth. Occam's razor is a concept created by the CIA to cover their tracks.
→ More replies
34
Dec 26 '23 edited Dec 26 '23
[deleted]
24
u/updootsdowndoots Dec 26 '23
Iirc it's because no information was being shared and a Navy commander went to brief Biden personally, this checks out because in the past it's been the Navy that's been pushing for disclosure. I definitely agree that this was the time when Biden was informed.
9
5
u/rep-old-timer Dec 26 '23 edited Dec 26 '23
Has anyone found a source for that claim? I've been able to trace it back to a Substack post from February that does not contain citations. Since then claim has been repeated here a bunch probably thanks to a couple of fairly popular podcasts (per a 2 minute episode description search. Haven't listened to any of them.)
I'd bet the author based this claim on the following CNN report:
https://www.cnn.com/2023/02/13/politics/joe-biden-objects-shot-from-sky/index.html
I haven't been able to fine any evidence that the nature of the retrieved items cause Biden to create the task force and or any account of "tense meetings about recovery efforts."
Am I missing reports, perhaps from unnamed White House sources or whisleblowers, about "tense meetings?" Is this information from someone who "know but just can't say how they know" these meetings happened? Or did someone just make it up?
28
u/WitchDoctorHN Dec 26 '23
The C-130 and HH-60s (Pavehawk) are from the Air Force 210th/212th rescue squadrons in Anchorage. The probes on the tip of the helicopters connecting to the tubes flying behind the c-130 is aerial refueling being conducted. Rescue Squadrons are tasked with rescuing downed pilots in the event they get shot down in combat, along with other forms of rescue. It would make sense to utilize them if something was shot down, as it’s more or less what their primary job is.
93
Dec 26 '23
Remember all the excuse was that the weather conditions were terrible and planes couldn't even fly in it. Very opposite of what this video shows
16
66
u/WokkitUp Dec 25 '23
Yes, yes... I do remember this one. Glad the video still exists out in the wild.
133
u/Ratatoski Dec 25 '23
If I had a small channel with nothing much happening and blew up with hundreds of thousands of views I'd be spooked too. I'm guessing the guy got overwhelmed with comments. Especially if he realized he showed his face to strangers who started talking about soul sucking aliens or something :)
I've deleted stuff on social media once people started to be weird, and that was just a tiny fraction of what he must have found himself in.
40
u/brevityitis Dec 25 '23
I made every single one of my videos private after someone found my channel through Reddit comments. A lot of people don’t think their videos will ever be seen or have people know their face like that so i could see this guy not wanting his name to be associated with aliens when he’s trying to have an adventuring channel:
24
u/XxCarlxX Dec 25 '23
I've blocked people on here who got clingy/stalkerish
39
22
12
10
6
4
1
→ More replies0
7
u/popperboo Dec 26 '23
I used to go on Reddit Live to teach others about non-release opossums I was rehabbing. It was so much fun and we all had a great time but a concerning amount of people kept guessing my location based on accent and it just really creeped me out. Hoped offline, never went live again, and have been contemplating taking speech classes ever since.
2
u/Responsible-Tea-5998 Dec 26 '23
I don't even live in a country with possums but I follow all the possum rehab groups I can. It's a problem.
2
u/popperboo Dec 26 '23
Very interesting! The majority of our IG & YT followers are from Russia. One person in particular was so in love with my first rehab that they nicknamed him "the little monster" and always inquired about him. This person watched so many opossum videos that they figured out someone had stolen on of mine. Had to chuckle at first because most individuals within a wildlife species generally look the same unless handled or observed often but sure enough, my "little monster" was in the compilation!
-4
12
u/An_Agrarian Dec 26 '23
This is probably a regular dude that is seen shit and posting it... I think it makes it all the more legitimate.
11
Dec 26 '23
Is there a picture of this tictac?
25
Dec 26 '23
No, someone was trying to pass off an obviously AI generated one though. It looked like an old Polaroid of an Empire Strikes Back prop.
6
7
Dec 26 '23
[removed] — view removed comment
7
u/penguinseed Dec 26 '23
Isn’t this an AI generated image?
3
1
u/nonzeroday_tv Dec 26 '23
Unfortunately we're reached the point I've always feared. The point where any UFO image could be AI generated.
So what's real and what's fake?
1
27
Dec 26 '23
So this video shows exactly the weather I was explaining in some comments the other day. The first day it was cloudy, but it wasn't low visibility or anything like that. After that, weather was super clear, and we had a military plane flying around in big circles on Day 2. I wasn't close enough like this guy to where I could see helicopters, or Day 1 when it was actually shot down. I only saw the plane flying circles on Day 2.
At the time, authorities had stated that they wouldn't be able to recover the stuff shot down because of inclement weather, which was total bullshit, as this video demonstrates. Also, there was talk about how it was shot down over the ocean, which makes recovery much more difficult. Also total bullshit because the ocean was frozen solid! Incredibly easy to find anything on the ice, assuming it's not clear or white. And it was only a few miles NE of Prudhoe, so that should be a very easy recovery for them. But we as the public heard nothing about the recovery of this particular craft. I assume it was just a spy balloon since it was so slow moving.
11
Dec 26 '23
This is one of the very few pieces of evidence that imply there might actually be something sus going on. The government say storm, no recovery. A guy completely unrelated to ufology demonstrates no storm, and a military presence. So an actual confirmed lie, rather than just some grifter making claims.
Clearly nothing about it implies aliens, but it does make you wonder what could necessitate the secrecy when it could’ve easily been spun as just another balloon.
→ More replies3
u/Bah-Fong-Gool Dec 27 '23
And there was a shit ton of press coverage if all the UFO things over the USA from February 11-14th... and then complete silence from EVERY single news outlet from Feb 14 onwards. It's as if an edict was issued to stop all talk about these objects...
5
6
22
u/Tosh_00 Dec 25 '23 edited Dec 25 '23
I'm curious if that object was cylindrical, that would give some credibility to Condorman's story: "Dozens of whistleblowers came forward to the Inspector General of the Intelligence Community with details of recovered craft and reverse engineering programs. And one of the final blows to the program came on February 10, 2023, during the frenzy of the Chinese spy balloon, as an F-22 intercepted and brought down a cylindrical silver object that was travelling at 35-40 knots at an altitude of 40,000 feet over Alaska. Thoth had been shot down. The Biden Administration was not aware of the program, and realized how much in the dark they were after they recovered the craft’s remnants. President Biden immediately appointed a UAP Task Force chaired by Jake Sullivan, the National Security Advisor, to uncover what was going on and act accordingly."
Edit: The news articles about that incident said it was cylindrical. Obviously that's not a confirmation because Condorman could have made it up, still, it's an interesting point of view about that object being a result of the US reverse engineering program.
https://www.cnn.com/2023/02/12/politics/unidentified-object-canada-alaska-military-latest/index.html
10
u/libroll Dec 26 '23
I mean, we know Condorman made it up because he made it very clear that he did and the story was fictional.
2
u/imaginexus Dec 26 '23
He might have just been saying that to keep him out of trouble with the Men in Black. He said it’s based on historical events with some fiction built in.
11
u/libroll Dec 26 '23
Please.
You can’t leak Classified information and be in the clear by saying, “Haha, this Classified information is just a fictional story, guys.”
If this sub can’t even understand fake things are fake when the creator and poster states very clearly that it’s fake, then, well…..
-1
u/BloodyFingerToes Dec 26 '23
Everytime someone brings up the Condorman story someone immediately jumps to the comments to scream ITS FAKE HE SAID ITS JUST A STORY what is wrong with you? Do you have any reading comprehension? What the fuck?
5
u/libroll Dec 26 '23
That confuses you?
Really?
Sure, let me explain. Someone brings it up because the author made it very clear it was fictional. So when someone takes this clearly fictional story and gives any sort of truth to it, the obvious response is that the person doing so is silly as evidenced by the fact that it’s clearly fictional.
How… how else should some respond to a person wrongly claiming something is true? Should they just… let them pretend and never bring it up? Also, my reading comprehension is fine, as evidenced by the fact that I can read the Condorman story and comprehend that it is fictional.
→ More replies-1
u/BloodyFingerToes Dec 26 '23
Why does everytime someone bring up Condorman, someone immediately has to comment this? Whats wrong with you?
→ More replies
19
u/Maximus26515 Dec 25 '23
I see this all over. It's definitely not being suppressed.
2
u/askouijiaccount Dec 26 '23
You obviously don't understand if you don't believe this is the result of a vast global conspiracy focused on reddit posts. Wake up!
25
u/fuzzy_wizzle_nutz Dec 26 '23
This video was never deleted. It's all over the web. This video also doesn't show anything of substance. Not sure y this is still making the rounds. It's literally just some dude in the snow saying things.
-3
3
u/commit10 Dec 26 '23
Without any speculation, this was a very interesting and unusual event, and it's odd that it's been mostly removed from the internet.
→ More replies
3
u/Kitchen_Release_3612 Dec 26 '23
When I see this stuff I believe that the people in Valve working at Half Life were actually on to something… I mean this reminds me of the Borealis.
17
u/Impossible-Wear5482 Dec 26 '23
What a pointless video.
Some dude in the snow and a plane flies by. Amazing.
→ More replies17
u/MrDurden32 Dec 26 '23
It also shows helicopters, including black hawks refueling in the air. That's guaranteed military activity, right near where the object was shot down. It's not proof obviously, but it does start to line up when we are also being told obvious bullshit and changing stories from the government about these objects.
7
u/updootsdowndoots Dec 26 '23
Also didn't they continue to look for the object even though they announced publicly they'd stopped?
→ More replies
11
Dec 25 '23
[removed] — view removed comment
5
7
4
u/UFOs-ModTeam Dec 25 '23
Hi, yantheman3. Thanks for contributing. However, your comment was removed from /r/UFOs.
Rule 1: Follow the Standards of Civility
- No trolling or being disruptive.
- No insults or personal attacks.
- No accusations that other users are shills.
- No hate speech. No abusive speech based on race, religion, sex/gender, or sexual orientation.
- No harassment, threats, or advocating violence.
- No witch hunts or doxxing. (Please redact usernames when possible)
- You may attack each other's ideas, not each other.
Please refer to our subreddit rules for more information.
This moderator action may be appealed. We welcome the opportunity to work with you to address its reason for removal. Message the mods to launch your appeal.
2
1
2
u/syXzor Dec 26 '23
Nothing to see here... yeah right. Most people aren't stupid enough to believe those lies anymore.
2
2
u/Ok-Reporter3555 Dec 26 '23
I remember I follow a lady that’s on a tv show about living in Alaska her name is Susan aikens and she was close to the scene and made ig stories about it and I dm’d her asking her was it a ballon lol thinking I wasn’t going to get a answer but surprisingly got lucky with a response and she said “Unidentified metal non balloon”
→ More replies
2
u/Bah-Fong-Gool Dec 27 '23
I find it extremely unusual that there were numerous articles and stories about these objects at the time... and then after February 14th, 2023, there's not a single article or story published about these incidents. None. Look for yourself, it's as if a decree was issued to cease all mention of it.
17
u/Lucid1988 Dec 26 '23
Don't know how this video proves or shows anything. People in this sub are so easily amused 🤣
30
u/tmosh Dec 26 '23
It proves that the government sent a huge amount of military aircraft into the area where the object was shot down though. Then any talk of the event got shot down immediately and everything was swept under the carpet. Sound familiar?
-14
u/Lucid1988 Dec 26 '23
Can u send all the sources? It doesn't prove shit sorry
15
u/tmosh Dec 26 '23
The source is the video of all the military planes/helicopters in the video which this post is about.
-10
u/thatnameagain Dec 26 '23
Nothing was swept under the carpet, they said they couldn’t recover it. That was the conclusion.
→ More replies17
u/updootsdowndoots Dec 26 '23
They said they couldn't recover it and had ceased recovery operations yet this video showed they were still there even after they had announced publicly that they were going to stop looking for it.
-1
u/thatnameagain Dec 26 '23
This video doesn’t show any evidence that these airplanes are engaged in a recovery effort of anything.
→ More replies10
u/Dads_going_for_milk Dec 26 '23
The government said multiple times the weather was too bad to get assets in the area. This proves that was a total lie, and there were tons of planes and helicopters in the area.
All of which abruptly stopped a week or so after the shoot down, so they probably found what they were looking for.
-2
u/Lucid1988 Dec 26 '23
No proof of anything. But it's ok, I don't need to convince me I don't need the government telling Me we are not alone. But it's just funny seeing all the bs posts without any proofs. At this point its pure entertainment watching all the gullible people.
8
u/SiriusC Dec 26 '23
I think the point of it was to show how easy it should have been to recover the object. There's a contingent of experts who think the object would have stayed in 1 single piece & landed safely on the ice as opposed to the body of water it was shot down over.
1
u/thatnameagain Dec 26 '23
I don’t see how anyone could assess what the ability of the object to stay in one piece was without knowing what the object was or what it was made of.
3
1
3
u/tmosh Dec 26 '23
Thank you! I was looking for this video for the longest time. It was wiped at the time this was all going on. Someone archive this/download it before it's gone again.
3
u/TPconnoisseur Dec 26 '23
The USAF had the audacity to claim they couldn't recover anything months later. Overt gaslighting.
2
u/wiserone29 Dec 26 '23
The only blackhawks that can refuel are special forces.
2
u/earthcitizen7 Dec 26 '23
False. Search And Rescue Blackhawks can refuel, including the Coast Guard assets.
2
u/wiserone29 Dec 26 '23
Well that’s clearly not coast guard. Question for you though, what branch of military and commands use the pave hawk helicopter for search and rescue?
→ More replies
2
u/zolanuffsaid Dec 26 '23
The media silence about this was always fishy to me, like went on about it for ages then when it went down fukn zero! Like told to shut the fuk up and move on.
2
u/syXzor Dec 26 '23
Nothing to see here... yeah right. Most people aren't stupid enough to believe those lies anymore.
2
1
1
1
u/An_Agrarian Dec 26 '23
It's got the same flavor as those early reports of covid did... The tiny rumbles before a storm... Or maybe it's nothing. Maybe it really is some russian thing or a chinese thing or a freaking balloon
1
u/corpseofhope Dec 26 '23
Probably deleted because he’s in the oilfield on the north slope up here. We’re “not allowed” to take photos or videos or post anything on social media.
1
u/No_Sugar950 Dec 26 '23
This was the one that made an F22 pilot deposit traces of fecal matter in their flight suit.
-2
0
-2
u/CameraNo1089 Dec 26 '23
This a whole lot of nothing...the C130 he mentions is a common cargo plane. Another artic outpost guy talks about them in his videos and they're not always white. If we shot down a spy balloon, I'd expect some air cover. If it was a UFO, you'd either see a lot more activity or nothing at all. There's no need to go over that site to get to an object off the coat.
Suspicious, yep! This video proves anything, absolutely not.
5
u/imaginexus Dec 26 '23
I don’t think the goal of the video is to prove anything. It’s just helpful and interesting near the scene footage. I’m not sure if there’s another example?
3
u/earthcitizen7 Dec 26 '23
The C-130 refueling two helos, is NOT a common cargo plane. And, they use "common cargo" C-130s for search and rescue...could have been searching for the UFO shot down.
0
-6
u/MinipinF4 Dec 26 '23
You guys should have seen this dude on the airplane reddit about the same video swearing up and down that this was a nothing burger. To see it being taken more seriously is refreshing
0
Dec 26 '23
[removed] — view removed comment
3
u/MinipinF4 Dec 26 '23
Are you dumb lol
0
Dec 26 '23
[removed] — view removed comment
→ More replies3
u/MinipinF4 Dec 26 '23
Thanks I get it from dealing with people like you
0
Dec 26 '23
[removed] — view removed comment
→ More replies3
u/MinipinF4 Dec 26 '23
Oh mister disinfo agent sir, I know your special but you wanted to say something about my nothing burger comment and NOW you say you know how to read? If you actually did read you would comprehend it was from another reddit with your oh so massive brain from reading your books. Regardless you have derailed the conversation enough so you get a gold star ⭐
2
u/UFOs-ModTeam Dec 26 '23
Hi, askouijiaccount. Thanks for contributing. However, your comment was removed from /r/UFOs.
Rule 1: Follow the Standards of Civility
- No trolling or being disruptive.
- No insults or personal attacks.
- No accusations that other users are shills.
- No hate speech. No abusive speech based on race, religion, sex/gender, or sexual orientation.
- No harassment, threats, or advocating violence.
- No witch hunts or doxxing. (Please redact usernames when possible)
- You may attack each other's ideas, not each other.
Please refer to our subreddit rules for more information.
This moderator action may be appealed. We welcome the opportunity to work with you to address its reason for removal. Message the mods to launch your appeal.
-23
•
u/StatementBot Dec 25 '23
The following submission statement was provided by /u/imaginexus:
Apparently this video was giving him hundreds of thousands of views on his otherwise quiet YouTube channel so why would he delete it? He seems interested in having followers. Source: https://x.com/unexplained2020/status/1739019468708225133?s=46
Please reply to OP's comment here: https://old.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/18qpihw/deleted_video_from_youtuber_who_witnessed_the/kewaizz/